I wonder what you would say if proof that your precious administration is doing the same thing with bin Laden that Clinton did..
This is an interesting question in many ways. You asked me the same thing awhile back as to what I would do if you could find proof that Bush II led us into a war knowing that chem/bio/nuclear weapons did not exist in Saddam's arsenal.
Well my answer here is the same. If you can show that the US let Osama escape intentionally I would say it's time for our regime to change. I doubt that it exists.
As a second point, and perhaps this is the result of a Freudian slip, but I notice that you admit to agreeing that Bily Jeff KNOWINGLY let thugs like Osama and Saddamite Hussinsein run free, when something could have been done about them, for purely political purposes. Maybe I have been too hard on you because this thought rattles the brain of most Clintonista.
Now in summation this statement of yours is a microcosm of the differences between you and I. You think the Bush administration is precious to me. The truth is that I agree with Dubya on the war issue and others as well. I also disagree with Dubya on many issues. I take each situation based on the REALITY of the situation. Whether the current administration is leftist, righ wing, or centrist has no bearing on whether something is or isn't the right thing to do.
The party I am most aligned with as to philosophy is the Libertarian party. Of the major 2 I am far more likely to do with the Republicans as flawed as they are. At least they have a cogent agenda as opposed to a bunch of 60's freaks whose only agenda is "they are wrong and want to poison your air and water and cut off Socil Security although we have no clue what we would do different".
Billy Jeff Clinton as is obvious is a man I have no respect for. That being said I agreed with much of his policy. My disagreement had to do with the nature of the person himself. IMHO a man who dodged the draft is never an acceptable choice as commander in chief. A man wh o raises his right hand under oath and commits perjury is never acceptable as head law enforcement officer. I could go on but I feel the point is made.
The same applies to Al Gore. Although the election was the closest in modern politics George won by the law as it existed. Al Gore was at one time a man I had some respect for. When 1 stoops to attempting to get military absentee ballots thrown out while at the same time attempting to kepp ballots cast by illegal immigrants in for the sole pursuit of power shows their unfitness.
One of the people I admire most on the planet is Jimmy Carter. Not that I agree with his politics so much as that I see through his deeds that his motives are pure.
In other words I make an effort to judge each leader and each major issue based on the person's character and the issue's factual merit.
What I don't do is march in mindless robotic lockstep to the rants of any group. All political groups are comprised of human beings and are therefore slanted in one direction or the other. That's fine as we are all attempting to sway other's to our point of view. It is when someone takes 1 side as fact without question and writes off the other side without question that mind's become fogged and confused.
Perhaps you should add some other venues to "bushwatch" for your news sources and give different views a fair look. Maybe your view will change? Maybe it won't? Whatever conclusion you come to at least it will be grounded in thought rather that political dogma. My $0.02.
PEACE
