I'm addicted... (TC or SI?)

See thats the issue with running such a large setup, a truck car. I have the same issue //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
I have 2 15" mags awaiting an install, id love to put them in a ported 7.5-8.0 cube enclosure tuned to about 32hz, but thats not exactly possible to do. Im leaning more towards a 5 cubes sealed for both. Ill worry about that later.

The only issue is IF you can somehow get a box as large as you're thinking into your trunk, you dont really need to push it upto 9 cubes either.

7 cubes (after displacment) would more then be enough for 2 15s to get moving.

Dont worry so much about the port tuning between 30-32. You'll be fine either way IMO.
wtf have you lost your mind son? good luck having that max not rattle down the street. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
wtf have you lost your mind son? good luck having that max not rattle down the street. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
The single B15 in mine is working just fine atm. I cant justify tearing it apart again. Im actually considering picking up a 2nd vehicle for work (blazer or something) so I just might end up putting the mags in there, im not exactly in a rush. The current system sounds amazing as is.

Where the hell have you been? lost in those books? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eyebrow.gif.fe2c18d8720fe8c7eaed347b21ea05a5.gif

 
Well I am totally and irretrievably addicted to bass now. I installed my first "real" substage a couple weeks ago and I'm loving it... but I want more and better.
So right now I have a 15" TC-3000k in 3.1 sealed on a Sundown @ 1.4ohms, forward firing in my trunk.

Next paycheck I am thinking about upgrading. A couple words about the TC3k first though. It has very good tonal clarity and hits great in the 30hz range. Has decent to good authority at 20hz, but could be a lot better. It sounds pretty good tone-wise but it is a bit sluggish and muddy on drums. It is loud (I think), but not loud enough. I have never been to a comp or heard SPL setups so I can't compare how loud it really is.

Anyway I'm looking for three things in this order: Better sound quality with emphasis on very sharp accuracy, speed and control for kickdrums and electronic music, more volume, and more powerful lows in the 20hz range!

So there are 3 setups I am considering but I am also taking suggestions of course (I have about 5.5 cubes max to work with), whichever I decide on I will be adding a Sundown to strap for +/- 3500 watts:

1 x 18" LMS-5400 in about 4.5 cubes ported tuned to 22-26hz

1 x 18" TC-5200 ported OR with passive radiator box (concerned about SQ???)

2 x 12" Mag D2 ported in about 4.2 cubes tuned to 25-30hz

I was also thinking about a 15" 06 XXX but I have heard some not so great things about them, heating up, breaking boxes, etc.

Regardless of which of these I choose I will also be getting another Sundown to strap for roughly 3500 watts.

I guess my question is, which of these will do you think will suit my needs the best? It is absolutely necessary for the upgrade to have great sound quality and faster response, but I also want it to be loud as shit.

Figured I would throw this out there a good 2 weeks or so before I buy anything, to give me time to think it over and all that. Sorry for typing so much... I'm long winded, can't help it.

Thanks guys.


The TC-3000's low Qts will make hungry for EQ around 20Hz in a sealed box. It will have almost no bass there unless you EQ it or use it in a ported box as it is really intended for. Lower BL drivers tend to fair better in sealed boxes because they require less EQ and lower voltage sources to achieve displacement

I would add as much EQ as your amp can give out at 20Hz or until the driver bottoms out. This is a simple game of displacement and if your driver is not moving enough, your not getting everything out of it. If you have no eq boost on the driver, then this should not even be a debate, go EQ it as much as your amp can give and see what happens.

Ported boxes can make a difference because at tuning, you're going to have added SPL from the port resonator. The TC-3000 works very good in a ported box because of its high BL However it the box is too large, you may see a decrees in SPL in the mid bass from the low Q alignment, same problem in the seal box (needs EQ), but with the port resonator you cant just EQ the SPL from the driver and not the port so making a linear response because much more tricky and hence requires modeling. Secondly, making a ported box small can compromise the port displacement so you’re fighting an uphill battle getting linear response out of a very low Q driver even in a ported box. In theory, you want a small box for the driver, but a large box for the resonator. This is why we commonly use passive radiators, it gets rid of the port length / area problem and makes linear response much easier to achieve.

If you want some specific advice, shoot me an email, and i'll show you want i mean as far as various alignments. Much of the time in car audio, Poor SQ is a result of non-linear frequency response. There is no reason the TC-3000 can’t sound very articulate in the right system.

The SI and or TC-2000 would need less EQ in a sealed box, but you would still need some. Their higher Q makes them both a bit tamer and possibly easier to implement correctly. The 18” LMS-5400 may be a good choice for around 4.5 cubic feet ported at around 25Hz. It is dead flat at that alignment and will give you plenty of very deep bass. This driver requires lots of resonator displacement so its best to use it with passive radiators which don't compress fast as ports and can be tuned lower without displacement comprise.

The TC-5200 is not what you want. It’s more of what the TC-3000 offers which I think its giving you the response problems. You'll need almost 20dB of EQ at 20Hz for linear response in a sealed box. This is really an SPL driver.

The 06 XXX comes from the other spectrum, very high Qts, so it will sound nice and low in a sealed box probably with almost no EQ. This would be the best driver to stick with if you want a larger sealed box with a very nice response with deep bass.

 
The TC-3000's low Qts will make hungry for EQ around 20Hz in a sealed box. It will have almost no bass there unless you EQ it or use it in a ported box as it is really intended for. Lower BL drivers tend to fair better in sealed boxes because they require less EQ and lower voltage sources to achieve displacement
I would add as much EQ as your amp can give out at 20Hz or until the driver bottoms out. This is a simple game of displacement and if your driver is not moving enough, your not getting everything out of it. If you have no eq boost on the driver, then this should not even be a debate, go EQ it as much as your amp can give and see what happens.

Ported boxes can make a difference because at tuning, you're going to have added SPL from the port resonator. The TC-3000 works very good in a ported box because of its high BL However it the box is too large, you may see a decrees in SPL in the mid bass from the low Q alignment, same problem in the seal box (needs EQ), but with the port resonator you cant just EQ the SPL from the driver and not the port so making a linear response because much more tricky and hence requires modeling. Secondly, making a ported box small can compromise the port displacement so you’re fighting an uphill battle getting linear response out of a very low Q driver even in a ported box. In theory, you want a small box for the driver, but a large box for the resonator. This is why we commonly use passive radiators, it gets rid of the port length / area problem and makes linear response much easier to achieve.

If you want some specific advice, shoot me an email, and i'll show you want i mean as far as various alignments. Much of the time in car audio, Poor SQ is a result of non-linear frequency response. There is no reason the TC-3000 can’t sound very articulate in the right system.

The SI and or TC-2000 would need less EQ in a sealed box, but you would still need some. Their higher Q makes them both a bit tamer and possibly easier to implement correctly. The 18” LMS-5400 may be a good choice for around 4.5 cubic feet ported at around 25Hz. It is dead flat at that alignment and will give you plenty of very deep bass. This driver requires lots of resonator displacement so its best to use it with passive radiators which don't compress fast as ports and can be tuned lower without displacement comprise.

The TC-5200 is not what you want. It’s more of what the TC-3000 offers which I think its giving you the response problems. You'll need almost 20dB of EQ at 20Hz for linear response in a sealed box. This is really an SPL driver.

The 06 XXX comes from the other spectrum, very high Qts, so it will sound nice and low in a sealed box probably with almost no EQ. This would be the best driver to stick with if you want a larger sealed box with a very nice response with deep bass.
nice write up, i learned couple of things //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
Well I'm still not completely set on what I'm going to do, but I have somewhat solidified on something right now since the LMS 5400s are unavailable with no ETA.

I want to try two 15" Mags ported in my trunk. I've done extensive measuring and I can fit about 9 cubes in there. The specs I have worked out, which I would like you guys to look over and confirm, would be 9 cubes gross, 6.7 cubes net, 36" long port with 90" port area tuned to 29hz. Dimensions would be 44x26x17 external and 42.5x23.75(.75x3, double baffle)x15.5 internal, or 9.05 cubes. The port is 1.88 cubes, so the net after bracing/drivers would be around 6.7ish cubes.

The box and subs would be pointed towards the cabin with the surrounding space closed off from the rest of the trunk. The box almost fills the entire trunk anyway so that will be easy.

This will be run off my 1 Sundown for the time being, and a 2nd one possibly for the future.

Does this sound pretty good and look correct? Am I missing anything?

 
Yep, that'll work just fine. As long as you seal off the trunk from the baffle of the subs (make it so the subs fire into the cabin and do not leave room for anything to get to the trunk). Depending on the size of your car, though, you might want to tune a smidge higher...or go sealed. You are talking about two 15's here. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 
Yep, that'll work just fine. As long as you seal off the trunk from the baffle of the subs (make it so the subs fire into the cabin and do not leave room for anything to get to the trunk). Depending on the size of your car, though, you might want to tune a smidge higher...or go sealed. You are talking about two 15's here. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
It is a fairly roomy sedan... 96 camry, not roomy like a buick but enough. I really like the lows //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gif , but you think I should tune higher (30?)? That would make it a bit easier, I could have a bigger port I guess. SQ is still my high priority (I might have trouble convincing anyone of that with 2 15"s though //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif )

Otherwise you think the box looks good though? Just double checking before I send it to my box man (~Magick Man~) to get his thoughts on it.

 
Put it this way, even if you tune to higher you're not going to make the mags sound bad. I had my previous setup tuned to about 28hz and it does lack a bit of impact on bass hits, but sure shook the hell out of everything.

32-35hz port tuning would be just fine. You'll save a bit of space in the box tuning higher & I highly doubt you'll be missing any low end. Its 2 15s man, seal them up if you want SQ. Either way, its going to get loud & sound good doing it.

 
Not that the Mag's sound "bad" ported (not the case at all, really) but if you're SQ-oriented and LOVE the lower frequencies, go sealed. You've got to 15" drivers with around 2" of linear travel each, 3" peak each, so you'll have plenty of SPL. That way you'll save some room in your trunk b/c your box can be 5 cubes for the pair of 15's instead of 9 cubes. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fro.gif.c695f1f814b01c4ad99fe7f8cccadd29.gif

 
Well I ordered the 2 15" Mags, much thanks to Ben and Kevin from low-hz.com and of course the guys over at SI. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

I made a mock-up box for my trunk today and it will need to be built partially in the trunk. It's the same dimensions as those listed earlier, and it fits... just not through the opening //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

Subs and port will be facing the cabin and the baffle will be sealed off from the trunk, which is no problem because there is almost no clearance anyway.

I'll probably be starting a build-log type thread soon with pics. I'm still toying with port area and tuning but it will be somewhere around 29-30hz.

 
i had metal cones and they were more reliable than th pulp paper pressed cones all the underground subs use.... they dissipate the heat form the voice coil to all the cone giving it morepower handling and better linear control with out stressing...

and some metal cones tent to get hot... but thats normal...

 
... and better linear control with out stressing...

and some metal cones tent to get hot... but thats normal...
I would like to know how metal cones help with linear cone travel. That's news to me.

Paper cones get hot too. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif And paper is very strong and very light weight where as metal cones have weight to their disadvantage...not to mention the SQ qualities associated with the two cones (yes forum readers, go ahead and flame away at that comment).

 
SI, no question about it.
What are you listening to that has substantial material in the 20Hz range? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
I think some drums in India go that low forget what there called, not a whole lot of instruments that go below 35Hz

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

Buffalohed

10+ year member
Music Snob Extraordinare
Thread starter
Buffalohed
Joined
Location
Austin
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
150
Views
8,407
Last reply date
Last reply from
jblayz1
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top