yeah and not even a good theory at that...but i ail to see how your critique is valid...i mean if you actually read lockes 'second treatise of government'...at least the parts pertaining to the state of nature/state of war.Yes, that's what I said. Natural rights are inalienable rights, and, I didn't make any sort of notion towards their correlation with this thread/somebodies point. I'm criticizing your interpretation of the theory which you brought it. That's all it is by the way, a theory.
