If you had to save your pets life or a strangers life who would you choose?

Who would you save


  • Total voters
    83
exactly what i was thinkin lol
Plus, for shits sake, if you were to die, your dog will at least wait a day or 2 before he begins to eat you.

A stranger will probably only wait an hour at the most to sodomize your dead body and defecate on your chest. And then steal your wallet/valuables.

 
what kind of a dumbass question is this... but at the same time, based on how people react to animal death i don't doubt that a lot of people would save a dumbass pet first. people are just stupid that way.. but on the internet they're "cool" that way

 
what kind of a dumbass question is this... but at the same time, based on how people react to animal death i don't doubt that a lot of people would save a dumbass pet first. people are just stupid that way.. but on the internet they're "cool" that way
I hope a dog violates your little sister one day.

 
if you want to take a utilitarianism approach... there's a greater possibility of greater good out of saving the life of the human compared to a pet... I don't know any animals feeding the poor (except through death...) the potential of a person is much greater than the potential of a pet

 
if you want to take a utilitarianism approach... there's a greater possibility of greater good out of saving the life of the human compared to a pet... I don't know any animals feeding the poor (except through death...) the potential of a person is much greater than the potential of a pet
Yeah, but wouldn't it be funny if you found out that person you saved, ended up raping women?

 
Yeah, but wouldn't it be funny if you found out that person you saved, ended up raping women?
potential... there's all kinds of what ifs that can be drummed up... what if the person you ended up saving was einstein, kennedy, hitler, stalin... point is you don't know who you're saving... the potential of a human life is still far greater than a pet... the life of a dog rarely makes a large impact on the fate of the world... except for maybe lassie

 
potential... there's all kinds of what ifs that can be drummed up... what if the person you ended up saving was einstein, kennedy, hitler, stalin... point is you don't know who you're saving... the potential of a human life is still far greater than a pet... the life of a dog rarely makes a large impact on the fate of the world... except for maybe lassie

At the same time, people have done far worse things then any dog ever will. It goes both ways..

 
At the same time, people have done far worse things then any dog ever will. It goes both ways..
greater potential can be used for good or bad... the possibility of letting greater good die is far worse than settling for a pet that does nothing except have aesthetic pleasure associated with it

 
greater potential can be used for good or bad... the possibility of letting greater good die is far worse than settling for a pet that does nothing except have aesthetic pleasure associated with it
You're too optimistic about human life...potential doesn't mean anything.

How many people truly have a positive impact in this world, as opposed to those that can honestly be determined to have had a negative impact on society?

I'm not being serious with this at all, as this thread is pretty dumb...but you can't play on potential, and think about the greater good of one person, because for that one person that does truly do something good, you can easily find a few bad apples.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

god hand

10+ year member
GET MONEY
Thread starter
god hand
Joined
Location
Dallas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
107
Views
2,042
Last reply date
Last reply from
bigbangtheory
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_2118.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top