I hate critiquing papers for English class.

[bds0688 10+ year member]

I am reading this kid's paper on alternative fuel sources. The paper is a ****ing mess. I'm almost positive cotjones or civicsi could make something better. The kid has terrible sentence structure, no train of thought, nothing. I can not find a god **** positive thing to say about this paper. He doesn't discuss any of the issues, and the few facts he does state are wrong or misinformed. I can't completely rip him a new one, so what things should I say to make it seem like I don't completely hate it?

I kid you not, this sentence exists in this paper. "Another disadvantage is that the fuel is slimy, smelly if you get any of it on you when you are putting gas in your car." He's trying to discuss diesel, but mentions putting gas in the car. Every sentence begins with "Another". I seriously wonder if his high school taught English.

Click to read more...

 

[billabongcr 5,000+ posts]

try poetry analysis. thats some bullshit.

dont revise the paper. when your supposed to trade him back, slap him in the head with it.

 

[Brock 5,000+ posts]

i feel your pain. i had to peer edit people's papers in english as well. waste of time.

 

[jimmclrk1 10+ year member]

Just tear it apart. When did you get the penis-****** swap operation?

 

[bds0688 10+ year member]

Bout a week ago, actually.