How to get the most power

Biker
10+ year member

Senior VIP Member
Which way gives me the most power to my two 10 inch subwoofers and 1100 watt 4 channel amp.

wire the two 8 ohm subs together for 4 ohms and wire it to channels 1 and 2 briddged Mono

or

Wire one 8 ohm sub to channel 1 and 2 bridged mono and the other 8 ohm sub to channels 3 and 4 bridged mono?

Thanks Biker

 
Which way gives me the most power to my two 10 inch subwoofers and 1100 watt 4 channel amp.
wire the two 8 ohm subs together for 4 ohms and wire it to channels 1 and 2 briddged Mono

or

Wire one 8 ohm sub to channel 1 and 2 bridged mono and the other 8 ohm sub to channels 3 and 4 bridged mono?

Thanks Biker
what amp?

 
Which way gives me the most power to my two 10 inch subwoofers and 1100 watt 4 channel amp.
wire the two 8 ohm subs together for 4 ohms and wire it to channels 1 and 2 briddged Mono

or

Wire one 8 ohm sub to channel 1 and 2 bridged mono and the other 8 ohm sub to channels 3 and 4 bridged mono?

Thanks Biker
First of all, //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/bigwave.gif.16324171cad2db62cf4f16568b038478.gif Welcome to our little corner of the car audio world. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

If you wire the two subs in parallel to make a 4 Ohm load and then run both subs off of a pair of amp channels in bridged mode you'll get whatever power the amp outputs in mono bridged mode divided by 2 and that is the wattage going to each sub.

If you were to bridge the amp to 2 channel mono bridged and then run one sub off of each bridged channel you'll still get whatever the amp outputs in mono bridged mode divided by 2 (dropping an 8 Ohm load onto an output whose wattage is rated @ a 4 Ohm load).

Looks like either option will yield the same result since you're powering 8 Ohm drivers.

 
let's say your amp does 50 x4 and 100x2 bridged. wire the subs to 4 ohms you get 100 watts going to the pair, so 50 watts a piece. now lets assume the amp does half the power at 8 ohms. so 50 watts x2. you wire the subs and you get the same power either way. wiring them to 8 ohms will cause less heat and strain on your amp, however you will then have your subs setup in stereo

 
So I would assume that less heat in the AMP is a good thing. But what about the two Tens being in Stereo? Is that good or bad?

Thanks

 
So I would assume that less heat in the AMP is a good thing. But what about the two Tens being in Stereo? Is that good or bad?
Thanks

i tend to like them run as mono. if you fade forward you'll loose the sub bass, and then when you balance it just wouldn't sound good. honestly i suggest you just sell the 4-channel and get a mono amp. if you bridge both subs and wire them to 4 ohms, you also have the other 2 channels available to run a set of components

 
The reason I am in this situation is because I took the 4 stock speakers off channel 1 and 2 and purchased another Rockford fosgate 4 channel amp to run 2 Infinity kappa perfects components and 2 Infinity 2 ways so now I have this original amp only for the subs.

The subs are MTX In a Thunderform box under the rear seat. If I want more power to them and my AMP has plenty of power should I replace the 8 OHM Subs with 4 Ohm ones? Or does anyone have any other ideas. My Amp is 2 OHM stable so I suppose I could put 2 4 ohm subs together for 2 Ohm load on channels 1 and 2 bridged Mono.

Am I thinking in the right direction or just leave the subs alone, They pounded pretty good before.

Thanks Biker

 
I would get rid of the 8 ohm and get 4 ohm subs. then hook one sub to bridge channels 1 & 2 then hook the other sub to bridged channels 3 & 4. your best bet is to go with a mono amp. they are better and you would get more power for the 8 ohm subs.other wise you wont get much from the 8 ohm subs because of the wiring options you have to go with.

 
Several options...

1) Most amps make more power @ 2 ohms than 4, but not double the power. If you wire each sub to a bridged pair of channels you will get more power to them than if you were to run both off one bridged pair and the amp will run cooler at the 8 ohm bridged load (same as if it were running in 4 ohm stereo mode).

2) Get a mono amp. The drawback to this IMO is that unless you get a pretty expensive amp, you will need to get the load lower than 4 ohms to get much power out of it. Basically you will need to buy a really big mono amp to get good 4 ohm power.

3) Get a decent sized 2 channel amp and run it bridged to the subs wired in parallel. You can get more power this way than with a comparably priced mono amp. The drawback to this is that the amp will likely be an A/B class amp and will draw more current from your electrical system. This may necessitate other upgrade on the electrical power side of things.

4) Get new subs that are 4 ohm and wire each one a bridged pair off the amp you have.

5) A combination of two of the above.

If I were you, I would start with the first one. It doesn't cost you anything but a few minutes of your time. If that doesn't do it for you look to one or more of the other suggestions. Personally I would lean toward the larger two channel amp to run bridged if cost was an issue.

 
I checked my subwoffers and since there wired together to ctrate a 4 Ohm Load and are rated at 450 Watts RMS I purchased a new Rockford Fosgate P4002 2 channel amp rated at 1 X 400 Watts RMS at 4 ohms Bridged mono.

Think that was a good option? They were drawing 250 Watts with the original amp and sounded pretty good.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

Biker

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Biker
Joined
Location
Tracy, CA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
12
Views
893
Last reply date
Last reply from
helotaxi
2006.jpg

Popwarhomie

    Jun 29, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
GOAT.jpg

Popwarhomie

    Jun 29, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top