Honestly, the new challenger = fail

[Redlineaudio 10+ year member]

Love the look of the car.

Hope they do a triple white.

 

[PollyCranopolis 10+ year member]

It's essentially a two-door version of the Charger SRT8. Both carry the identical 6.1-liter Hemi V8 — a bored-out version of the standard 5.7-liter motor. Both run the same 10.3:1 compression ratio. Both gulp 91-octane gasoline. Both make the same 425 horsepower at 6,200 rpm and 420 pound-feet of torque at 4,800 rpm. And the coolant capacity? The same 14 quarts. At 4,140 pounds and 4,160 pounds, both are heavyweights.

 

[wErd 5,000+ posts]

It's essentially a two-door version of the Charger SRT8. Both carry the identical 6.1-liter Hemi V8 — a bored-out version of the standard 5.7-liter motor. Both run the same 10.3:1 compression ratio. Both gulp 91-octane gasoline. Both make the same 425 horsepower at 6,200 rpm and 420 pound-feet of torque at 4,800 rpm. And the coolant capacity? The same 14 quarts. At 4,140 pounds and 4,160 pounds, both are heavyweights.

Lol!

 

[hoss 5,000+ posts]

It's essentially a two-door version of the Charger SRT8. Both carry the identical 6.1-liter Hemi V8 — a bored-out version of the standard 5.7-liter motor. Both run the same 10.3:1 compression ratio. Both gulp 91-octane gasoline. Both make the same 425 horsepower at 6,200 rpm and 420 pound-feet of torque at 4,800 rpm. And the coolant capacity? The same 14 quarts. At 4,140 pounds and 4,160 pounds, both are heavyweights.

whoa whoa whoa, hold the train a second...

are you suggesting that auto manufacturers use the same parts on different cars? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

 

[wErd 5,000+ posts]

I think that also makes it a magnum.

????

 

[Johnny Law.Lulz 5,000+ posts]

This is why ill drive almost anything Pre 90's and almost nothing past that with the exception of a 92 mustang and some other misc things, i hate all this computer shit, Its more to go wrong. Im only 16 but with the way my family is and the way i grew up i have a huge appreciation the old muscle cars of the 60's and 70's. I hate people comparing new cars to old cars because even if the new challenger was exactly the smae as the old one appearence wise it would still be computer shit under the hood.

 

[wErd 5,000+ posts]

This is why ill drive almost anything Pre 90's and almost nothing past that with the exception of a 92 mustang and some other misc things, i hate all this computer shit, Its more to go wrong. Im only 16 but with the way my family is and the way i grew up i have a huge appreciation the old muscle cars of the 60's and 70's. I hate people comparing new cars to old cars because even if the new challenger was exactly the smae as the old one appearence wise it would still be computer shit under the hood.

This thread is full of LOL

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

This thread is full of LOL

I haz hate for all dis efficient computer BS yo!

 

[hoss 5,000+ posts]

its the troof, computers ruin everything...

the interwebz were so much better before computerz //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

its the troof, computers ruin everything...
the interwebz were so much better before computerz //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

nDeed. Soup cans and string were so reliable.

 

[Johnny Law.Lulz 5,000+ posts]

Obviously im talking about computers in cars dumbass, do you think im posting with my homemade rock chisel and a piece of bark. I dont give a dam if i have 1969 mustang ripping my pockets dry or a 2009 mustang getting me better gas mialiage. Itll be cheaper to fix the 69 and its better quality anyway. If you dont like my opinions then oh well.

 

[Johnny Law.Lulz 5,000+ posts]

Obviously im talking about computers in cars dumbass, do you think im posting with my homemade rock chisel and a piece of bark. I dont give a dam if i have 1969 mustang ripping my pockets dry or a 2009 mustang getting me better gas mialiage. Itll be cheaper to fix the 69 and its better quality anyway. If you dont like my opinions then oh well.

 

[wErd 5,000+ posts]

Obviously im talking about computers in cars dumbass, do you think im posting with my homemade rock chisel and a piece of bark. I dont give a dam if i have 1969 mustang ripping my pockets dry or a 2009 mustang getting me better gas mialiage. Itll be cheaper to fix the 69 and its better quality anyway. If you dont like my opinions then oh well.

Do you even have a car youngin'?

 

[pioneerpimp 5,000+ posts]

i wanna know how many didnt know it was the same EXACT srt-8 motor? considering everyone knows srt-8 is for the 300C, challenger, magnum, and charger.

its not that hard to figure out, its just a different body style, thats what they are getting at.

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

Obviously im talking about computers in cars dumbass, do you think im posting with my homemade rock chisel and a piece of bark. I dont give a dam if i have 1969 mustang ripping my pockets dry or a 2009 mustang getting me better gas mialiage. Itll be cheaper to fix the 69 and its better quality anyway. If you dont like my opinions then oh well.

I don't think it would be that much cheaper and there is more potential in newer designs. We accept your shitty opinion. It seems as though you have problems with accepting our opinion of your shitty opinion.

BTW, efficiency has more benefit than MPG //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

.