honest opinion on these amps here.

[Dirtrider4eva 10+ year member]

got an offer for a ed nine.5 amp for my aq1200d and a os US acoustics usx600f.

specs for mine

700x1 at 2

1200x1 at 1 (aq)

us acoustics

200x2 at 4

300x2 at 2

600x1 at 4 (12.6)

.0015% thd

for ed 9.5

100x4 at 4 12.5

175x4 at 2

350x2 at 4

then like 400x1 at 2

600x1 at 1 for sub

how would you feel?

curious.

my system now consists two door speakers, tweeters, rear fill, and wanting to add two addition tweeters and mid ranges. so would you do a trade?

Click to read more...

 

[winkychevelle 10+ year member]

i say just ditch the two channel for a four channel and run 2ohms per channel on your mids and tweets leaving out the rear fill amplification. aq's 4channel seems nice and budget friendly and should handle this task effortlessly.all the while leaving your 1200to sub duty

 

[mylows10 5,000+ posts]

i wouldn't do it .the ed amps are supposed to be nice ,but they look like earthquake amps to me

 

[Dirtrider4eva 10+ year member]

whats bad reffering to earthquake amps?

and yeah, however i feel i would lose some sq going from a ZED audio sq amp, to a aq amp, that isnt so sq orientated.