Hey you evolutionists...

[Alpine4life89 10+ year member]

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=C805D4953D9DEC66
just take some time to watch this movie. Yes, its biased, but, It has a lot of good material for "logical" or analytical thinkers.

the case of a creator? Is that the right one?

 

[Lugnutz 10+ year member]

When the Bible was written, they were unaware such facts as carbon dating would be possible. They should've played it safe and wrote "approximately 700 million years BC"

 

[bunkerking09 10+ year member]

Evolution isnt saying there ISNT a creator. Its just showing how life came to be on this planet.
But supposedly Adam and Eve has incestuos *** and all mankind is the result. This happened 6,000 years ago, when the earth was formed. Even though we have human remains from millions of years ago, life began 6,000 years ago. Does that make any sense?

How can someone believe the earth is 6,000 years old when we KNOW FOR 100% FACT THAT ITS BILLIONS OF YEARS OLD?

Are people really that fucking stupid?

We have human remains from millions of years ago? I wasn't aware of this either...man, you are far more knowledgeable about history than I apparently.

 

[perfecxionX 10+ year member]

Well I look at it like this.
Darwin based most of his work off of an experiment done by Stanley Miller in the 1953 at the University of Chicago. Miller attempted to recreate the beginning of the earths atmosphere, and create life. In several days a few amino acids were made. So it worked...

but then about 40 years later, scientists determined that the earths atmosphere didn't contain all the chemicals that Miller had used. They tried the experiment again, and nothing was able to be made.

if you want me to keep going i can....

Darwin was not alive in 1953. His theory was "the origin of species" not "the origin of life." Evolution does not have anything to do with the origin of life on earth. It shows of the origin of species via natural selection.

 

[bunkerking09 10+ year member]

the case of a creator? Is that the right one?

Case for a Creator

yea thats it lol

 

[bunkerking09 10+ year member]

Darwin was not alive in 1953. His theory was "the origin of species" not "the origin of life." Evolution does not have anything to do with the origin of life on earth. It shows of the origin of species via natural selection.

bah my mistake, let me find the thing that made darwins whole theory break down. one minute

 

[perfecxionX 10+ year member]

We have human remains from millions of years ago? I wasn't aware of this either...man, you are far more knowledgeable about history than I apparently.

 

[xX J Brutal Xx 10+ year member]

Evolution isnt saying there ISNT a creator. Its just showing how life came to be on this planet.
But supposedly Adam and Eve has incestuos *** and all mankind is the result. This happened 6,000 years ago, when the earth was formed. Even though we have human remains from millions of years ago, life began 6,000 years ago. Does that make any sense?

How can someone believe the earth is 6,000 years old when we KNOW FOR 100% FACT THAT ITS BILLIONS OF YEARS OLD?

Are people really that fucking stupid?

thats the handy work of the Devil! thats what he wants you to believe! Rofl

 

[bunkerking09 10+ year member]

^^^this is what kills darwin's theory.

 

[Alpine4life89 10+ year member]

Evolution isnt saying there ISNT a creator. Its just showing how life came to be on this planet.
But supposedly Adam and Eve has incestuos *** and all mankind is the result. This happened 6,000 years ago, when the earth was formed. Even though we have human remains from millions of years ago, life began 6,000 years ago. Does that make any sense?

How can someone believe the earth is 6,000 years old when we KNOW FOR 100% FACT THAT ITS BILLIONS OF YEARS OLD?

Are people really that fucking stupid?

i do not believe in the bible. Even if we are off with our age estimates on fossils, they are definitely over 6,000 years old. So don't think i am choosing sides here, because i don't know. There is no way that this earth is 6,000 years old, it just shows how stupid people were who wrote that crap.

 

[newusername 10+ year member]

Well I look at it like this.
Darwin based most of his work off of an experiment done by Stanley Miller in the 1953 at the University of Chicago. Miller attempted to recreate the beginning of the earths atmosphere, and create life. In several days a few amino acids were made. So it worked...

but then about 40 years later, scientists determined that the earths atmosphere didn't contain all the chemicals that Miller had used. They tried the experiment again, and nothing was able to be made.

if you want me to keep going i can....

How could Darwin have done most of his work based on an experiment you're claiming was done almost 100 years after he published "On the Origin of Species"?

makes sense.
Does anyone else get the feeling that nothing we perceive is real and only exists in our current minds? I just don't even know what to think anymore, nobody has given me a good enough explanation to agree with either side, and even if evolution is exactly how we got here, that doesn't mean there isn't a creator somewhere.

The idea that nothing exists outside of our mind is an age old philosophical question. I recommend doing some reading if you're interested.

As for your last question, you are absolutely correct in identifying that evolution does not preclude a creator (this is a common mistake made by the religious; imagine if a god created matter and the laws that govern it, then let his creation work itself out to what we have now), though that doesn't make the argument for the creator any stronger.

I wasn't aware that we came from the same ancestor as monkeys? Because if we had, wouldn't evolution be widely accepted by everyone?

It is widely accepted in the scientific community; only those who do not understand it or have not taken the time to research evolution fully think that it is not a fact.

There are a variety of arguments of different ways in which we got to exactly where we are now, but the idea of some sort of common ancestry (again, no one is saying that a monkey gave birth to **** sapiens sapiens) is very widely accepted.

The fundamentally religious have always ignored factual information, but the more clever of the religious have recognized that you can re-shape the god argument to be congruent with what science has shown us.

 

[galacticmonkey 5,000+ posts]

I wasn't aware that we came from the same ancestor as monkeys? Because if we had, wouldn't evolution be widely accepted by everyone?

According to the fossil record we came from the same ancestor as Apes. Evolution is as much of a fact as gravity is. Its happening in front of your very own eyes.

Also according to evolution we all came from a single original type of organism, called the last common ancestor.

Why isnt it widely accepted? Because there are still religious nuts out there who believe what some book says. A book that was written by men.

If God is real, why is there absolutely no proof? How come noone has been to heaven? What about hell? Where are these places? Why havent I ever seen God , a spirit, or an angel? Why does everyone nowadays who says they are a savior to mankind get locked up in a psych ward? What about all these supposed medical miracles? Its always stuff like a disease going away, which could be total chance. Why do people never regrow limbs? It would be a miracle that could NOT be chance, and would have to be divine intervention. It never happens. Why not? God causes other miracles, why not this one? Would it be too obvious and sway our "free will" that the bible says he isnt allowed to do? Or would that just be an excuse to cover up the fact that its all bullshit?

 

[bunkerking09 10+ year member]

Ok...I still don't see any documentation of HUMAN remains from millions of years ago.

 

[Lugnutz 10+ year member]

Why the hell would God create black people, or are they just not fully evolved apes?

 

[bunkerking09 10+ year member]

According to the fossil record we came from the same ancestor as Apes. Evolution is as much of a fact as gravity is. Its happening in front of your very own eyes.
Also according to evolution we all came from a single original type of organism, called the last common ancestor.

Why isnt it widely accepted? Because there are still religious nuts out there who believe what some book says. A book that was written by men.

If God is real, why is there absolutely no proof? How come noone has been to heaven? What about hell? Where are these places? Why havent I ever seen God , a spirit, or an angel? Why does everyone nowadays who says they are a savior to mankind get locked up in a psych ward? What about all these supposed medical miracles? Its always stuff like a disease going away, which could be total chance. Why do people never regrow limbs? It would be a miracle that could NOT be chance, and would have to be divine intervention. It never happens. Why not? God causes other miracles, why not this one? Would it be too obvious and sway our "free will" that the bible says he isnt allowed to do? Or would that just be an excuse to cover up the fact that its all bullshit?

I'm done. I'm not even going to try. You win. We are all just an accident.