Please.... I learned in preschool I'm not supposed to take from other people what isn't mine. Somewhere along the line some people forgot that.
Did you not also learn that if you bring cookies to class, that you have to bring enough for everyone? Maybe you forgot that concept.
That's one of the main concepts of social liberalism.
In the liberal viewpoint, the teacher is the government, and the student lucky enough to bake cookies represents the people in America born into wealth and opportunity. If you have access to flour, baking powder, and chocolate chips, while the majority of the class is in public school because their parents can't afford anything else, don't you feel the obligation to share with the class this advantage? Or maybe you unfoundedly believe that if all of the other students want cookies, they all should go ask they parent(s)/guardian(s) to buy something as cheap and essential as flour. What you don't understand is that they simply can't afford it. Those students go to soup kitchens for three of the five week day dinners, and they have free lunches from school. Do you think these students have the same opportunity to become educated and successful like you? Please... You don't know anything about other people's opportunities.
If you're lucky enough to have a salary of $80k, and you can "barely get by", imagine entire families who have incomes of $10-15k, on a good year, with a mother who owes $400k in doctor bills from surgeries so that she can walk. Imagine the four children who lost both parents at a young age, had no other family, and were thrown around from foster home to foster home, never getting the proper care they needed to become successful in academia. They have no support, no money to start their lives from, and no practical way of getting a job. No one hires them because they're minorities without even a high school education. Why would you hire them anyway? Stupid Mexicans probably can't even count to two anyway. That's obviously why they're uneducated, right? Or maybe they're just lazy. Maybe they don't
want it enough. After all, you as a store owner had to work through hardship. You had student loans for Christ's sake!
But the thing is, you don't see your success as luck. Because you know nothing about poverty and the life of those towing the line, you have no idea how lucky you truly are. You see it as you working your *** off, and that hard work paying off. The point is that circumstances are different for everyone, and exceptionally worse for those born into poverty. How do you know that these inner city minorities have not worked hard to make money and be successful like you?! That's all they want, yet they will never be able to achieve their goals. Not because they're lazy, not because they're potheads(this one isn't directed at you personally //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif ), and not because minorities
think they need government's help, but because they
do! Go to Chicago. Go to Detroit. Go to all of the cities with high crime rates and drop out rates. Tell me how the living conditions are. Tell me what the schools are like, how much the teachers care, and how many parents there are for each child. I can tell you now that you'll be shocked. You don't know what it's like.
But the right will always call the left lazy, ignorant, good for nothing, greedy, etc., for no reason other than that they simply do not understand. Us on the left vote for those who cannot vote for themselves. Photo ID costs money and needs to be renewed. So many Americans can't afford ID because they simply don't have the opportunity. Struggle is a real thing, and many places here in the US more closely resemble third world countries than Beverly Hills. So we vote for them. Liberals vote for humanity, not tradition, because people matter more than nice cars. There are wealthy liberals, I assure you. Just because most rich Conservatives are greedy and bitter, doesn't mean that everyone with money is.
Sure, you can say, "That's what charities are for," and you might be right in some instances. The thing is, charities don't have the resources or the manpower to achieve their goals. The government can do the job much more easily, efficiently, and equally. With a mandated tax specific for helping out minorities, along with its own office and resources, there is no need for the 30 different charities that are supposed to do the same thing -- but that's not to say that charities should go away, because they can always help as well.
Stop saying that liberals are Communists because it's simply not true. Capitalism is fine. It's great. Communism is entirely different than what most of everyone thinks. The thing is, because most people do not know, most people who cry out "Communist!" are wrong. But I understand where the concern comes from. While my ideas may be left, and maybe even close to being possibly classified as "socialist", I understand that there is a difference.
The position I hold is that equal opportunity comes before everything. Liberty matters, of course. But I would gladly pay a small percentage of my potential income to help out those who cannot help themselves. Of course, those with a salary of $250k+ would technically be paying more money, but that's obvious. Percentages are percentages. So yes, I believe that slightly raising taxes on us lucky enough to live in paid for houses with Internet, smartphones, laptops, clean water, fresh produce, and Arizer Extremes, for the better of our nation is worth it. Why? Because I spend my money. I try to stimulate the American economy in any way that I can. So should everyone else. If low income families start seeing more money, they pay off debts and try to get an education. Yes, there will be abusers of the system. There always will be, and it's an issue. There certainly have to be provisions to policies that would reflect my idea. Maybe put contingencies in these grants or whatever they would be, notifying the recipient that funding will stop if a certain amount of money is not accounted for during tax season, I don't know.
Anyway, regarding other taxes, I understand that corporations need money to do their work. Small tax breaks reflecting this, I feel, are not only important, but necessary. After all, the value of the dollar is based on how confident we are. If corporations are confident in their ability to hire and pay imployees, they will go after more deals, further helping the economy. If the single mom feels confident in her ability to take care of her child and give him/her a proper education, she will spend more. Along these lines, if corporations outsourcing see that everyone is happy again, they will(hopefully) bring back jobs and even further grow the economy. The beauty of this taxation is that if it is based on yearly income, when no one is under the perceived poverty line at any moment, there are no extra taxes for the wealthy.
Now, obviously, I'm operating under a few key assumptions which are:
1) Those with wealth no longer hoard it out of greed
2) Those at or under the poverty line do their fair share of work to step up
3) Government works as one, not as two separate entities fighting over who has more power(seriously, you take pride in grid locking Obama so that nothing gets done based on your idea of liberty? It's called evolution -- it's time to evolve. There are other people who inhabit this country. We don't care about your games.)
So, there it is. That's what I believe is possible/should be done. The deficit is obviously an issue, a huge one, possibly ending with a catastrophic failure for the economy, and there may actually be no coming back. I blame Washington DC. I blame partisan bickering and power grabs that have gone on for the past several decades, and more importantly the past 15 years or so. I blame the media for blatantly polarizing the country nearly down the middle and creating this in the first place. However, I do not blame Bush. Or Clinton. Or Obama. They are not the problem.