It's not a "belief" in the same sense as religion belief. It's the best hypothesis supported by scientific evidence and our observations of the universe.
A couple billion?
The current observations support an age of 13.5 - 14 billion. That's 7x longer than you indicate //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
"Big Bang" is a misnomer. There wasn't a bang (no space for sound to travel) and it wasn't big (the point that exploded was infinitesimally small).
And it didn't occur in space, there was no space for it to occur in. The "big bang" created space //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
A big chunk of rock didn't just fall into place. The short story is that "space dust" gathered around stars gradually coalesced into clumps of material to form planets/etc.
But you don't image that with billions and billions of stars, billions and billions of planets and billions and billions of years that some of these planets would have fallen within the "goldie locks zone" ? The statistics are that we are but one of millions or billions of planets within these zones.
With our present understanding of "extremophiles" it is likewise not at all impossible that life could form or be sustained on planets less like our own.
Millions to billions of years after it cooled. And you wouldn't expect to see oxygen breathing life forms on a planet devoid of oxygen, would you?
If we didn't have an oxygen atmosphere, oxygen breathing life would not have evolved. But who is to say that no life would have evolved? It simply wouldn't be the life we see here today. That doesn't mean that a life form different from what we are familiar with wouldn't have evolved, that by evolution and natural selection was able to thrive in the environment from which it found itself in.
We humans are here because of our environment, evolution and natural selection. If the environment was different, we wouldn't have evolved the way we have. We are a product of our surroundings. Nothing more.
The "fairy tale" of the big bang is the hypothesis that fits all of our experiments and observations of the natural world and universe. If you have a better hypothesis that currently fits all observed data and is supported by the experimental evidence, by all means put it forth.
Here is a pretty good revision of Genesis as it should read;
http://www.michaelshermer.com/2001/12/genesis-revisited/
You shouldn't.
Morals, both personal and social.
Personal and social morals.
Are you're telling me if you didn't believe in the Christian God, you would be a raping, mass murdering, pillaging thief? That's exactly what you're telling me if you don't think you could be a decent person without belief in god. I feel more sorry for you than you should feel for me.
I don't think any non-believer deludes themselves with the idea they are a "majority"
You would be better off reading some of the quotes from our founding fathers //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
Jesus and God do not control what we do, we are not predestined, we have free choice and everyday, every minuite we make a choice that changes what will happen in the future! only in very rare occasions does God, step in a show us a "magic trick"So Priests supposeably hear a calling from god which is why the choose to be a priest.
Why the hell if Jesus knows what will happen would he choose sum of these Priest who touch little boys and do these terrible ****** acts???
Thats a big one i never understood, why Jesus would send a POS like a 60yr old man that touches little boys for ****** enjoyment to preach his "word".
You pretty much have no understanding of anything about this do you?robinson said:what the hell is a soul ? i never took an x-ray and seen one b4. and why does all those who believe eat animals/meat?? in the bible wasnt someone trying to save all tha animals??. didnt he knock down some tower the people was building?? for what, once they got so high up they cant live without air they all was going to die anyways... all thats bs.
Well, if you look at it this way, not only did Satan get his prize by hurting all those childern and dishonoring a senior in the church, but also, he took one of Gods people away.Having *** with someone that is sooo extremely underaged at that is just taking advantage of their inability to reason and generally decipher right and wrong.
It might be a tad bit painful for each party too.
I see where ur coming from but society and our current legal systems dictates that an adult LEGALLY cant have *** with someone that is underage. Does it happen all the time?? Yes clearly. Will it ever be socially acceptable that a 60yr old man who is suppose to be a preacher of God's word, uses his influence through religion to louer (sp?) unsuspecting and unwilling children to touch them in a ****** nature..... I would bet my life on it that will never happen.
Children are looked at as pure and clearly naive (majority of children) to their surroundings. I just cant stomach the fact that Priests did things like this knowing that they could by using the religion that was supposeably so sacred to them.
Also i didnt grow up an atheist, i was raised in a 1/2 christian 1/2 catholic household and did all the way up to my confirmation. At 18yrs old i found out that the priest in my old church i formerly attended (the one that baptised me, etc) through the years had sexually assaulted hundreds of children throughout the 70s and 80s.
It made me nearly vomit when i found out someone who i thought was the closest thing to god and was so close with me and my family could do someothing like that.
We get our basis for our laws from where?Having *** with someone that is sooo extremely underaged at that is just taking advantage of their inability to reason and generally decipher right and wrong.
It might be a tad bit painful for each party too.
I see where ur coming from but society and our current legal systems dictates that an adult LEGALLY cant have *** with someone that is underage. Does it happen all the time?? Yes clearly. Will it ever be socially acceptable that a 60yr old man who is suppose to be a preacher of God's word, uses his influence through religion to louer (sp?) unsuspecting and unwilling children to touch them in a ****** nature..... I would bet my life on it that will never happen.
Children are looked at as pure and clearly naive (majority of children) to their surroundings. I just cant stomach the fact that Priests did things like this knowing that they could by using the religion that was supposeably so sacred to them.
Also i didnt grow up an atheist, i was raised in a 1/2 christian 1/2 catholic household and did all the way up to my confirmation. At 18yrs old i found out that the priest in my old church i formerly attended (the one that baptised me, etc) through the years had sexually assaulted hundreds of children throughout the 70s and 80s.
It made me nearly vomit when i found out someone who i thought was the closest thing to god and was so close with me and my family could do someothing like that.
He can, but he doesn't. Why, I can only speculate, and anything I say your going to call BS so we will not go there.robinson said:If God Is So Powerful Cant He Stop A Bad Person B4 They Do Somthing Wrong?? But After It Happens You Blame It On The Devil