Watched that last night, quite interesting indeed.The Sandy Hook Shooting - Fully Exposed - YouTube
Worth watching... Some discrepancies there.
The Sandy Hook Shooting - Fully Exposed - YouTube
Worth watching... Some discrepancies there.
It's always hard to tell if someone is just trying to confuse people or spread the truth.I'm not one for conspiracy theories but I have to give +1 for you. Definitely interesting points.
I wonder if this guy has a video about skar audioThe Sandy Hook Shooting - Fully Exposed - YouTube
Worth watching... Some discrepancies there.
The seller has that choice. Depends if he wants it biting him back or not.Hate to say it, but he was right on wanting strict checks to have gun ownership. ALL face-to-face should be recorded imo.
Why do I need an automatic gun? Because my government has them! The second amendment was put there to make sure the people could stand up to an oppressive government, not so we can hunt or for sport. And to the people who think that cannot happen here, you are wrong. If we allow them to they will oppress anyone who does not agree with what they say. It has happened since the beginning of man and will as long as it is allowed.Sure. Difference is, be irresponsible with a gun and serious injury/death can occur. Be stupid with a stereo and someone could be annoyed. I'm also a gun owner and frequent shooter. But I think some rules should be changed. I don't believe private citizens should own fully automatic weapons. There is no need beyond wanting to blow **** up in your back yard. Wanting it isn't enough in my opinion. I want to power my house on my own nuclear reactor but I bet the government would object to that. I like explosions but I think the government would object if I had huge bombs laying around. The degree of irresponsibility in gun owners is higher than it should be. Don't take away my handguns and rifles, but increasing the regulation on obtaining a weapon is never a bad thing. I don't see how any responsible gun owner could ever be against tougher legislation on weapons.
Edit: I'd just like to tack on a few more thoughts now that I'm at a computer. Not that I'm calling you out, but I've noticed quite a few members saying derogatory things about Democrats. First of all, being a Democrat is not intrinsically linked to wanting the removal of guns. That's idiotic. I've stated before that I'm as liberal as they come on social issues and as such I don't really identify with either party. There are many issues that transcend party lines and I think this is one of them. That doesn't make me any less American; I just have a different opinion than some of you. It's not a black and white issue here. I don't believe firearms can ever be removed from America, it's a core tenant of our country. But having new regulations that ensure that the right people get access to firearms and others do not can be very beneficial. People on both sides of the argument need to compromise here.
The government also has nuclear weapons, countless varieties of bombs and missiles, etc. As an American, do you believe you have the right to bear those arms also? Where does that line of distinction get drawn? Would you feel comfortable with me stockpiling C4 with an innate hatred of...the post office? There are compromises to be made. I don't think assault weapons should be banned in every form but I do think regulation needs to be improved. Note I said improved, not added. Something should be done to ensure that the right people are getting these weapons. New York crazy man who managed to obtain weapons despite being a felon? That absolutely should not happen.Why do I need an automatic gun? Because my government has them! The second amendment was put there to make sure the people could stand up to an oppressive government, not so we can hunt or for sport. And to the people who think that cannot happen here, you are wrong. If we allow them to they will oppress anyone who does not agree with what they say. It has happened since the beginning of man and will as long as it is allowed.