Great SQL 10" subs

[LoudCrownVic 5,000+ posts]

why change?

 

[JoeHemi57 10+ year member]

not even close. tsx yes, definitly not the ssi.

why not?

 

[denim 5,000+ posts]

SS RL-i

SI BM

Fi SSD

 

[snoopdan 5,000+ posts]

Hey there is a guy selling a 10" TC Sounds prototype for like $70 in the classified section...was just added today

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

why not?

it is so bottom heavy, lacks top end (upper bass) and is lazy, inefficient. it is great for a basshead that has room for a huge box and 1000+ watts per woofer.

 

[JoeHemi57 10+ year member]

it is so bottom heavy, lacks top end (upper bass) and is lazy, inefficient. it is great for a basshead that has room for a huge box and 1000+ watts per woofer.

he has a orion 1200d, plenty of power and the box size is whats recommended by Treo. it is very bottom heavy and rolls off quick on the top end but for a 10" with more SPL (which is whar he wants) there aren't many better choices.

 

[killerb 10+ year member]

the polk sr104-dvc is a great sql sub. check it out. i have the sr124-dvc 12" version powered by a zapco c2k-4.0x putting 600w to it and this sub is very tight. it also gets loud in only a 1.2 cubic box.

 

[undits 10+ year member]

go with a 10'' SI BM...

at least i think that mouting is under 5.75''

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

he has a orion 1200d, plenty of power and the box size is whats recommended by Treo. it is very bottom heavy and rolls off quick on the top end but for a 10" with more SPL (which is whar he wants) there aren't many better choices.

so the tsx isnt a better choise because it is more what he is looking for?????