For those who like Math problems

FurbiesAndBeans
10+ year member

CarAudio.com Elite
Read this problem and I thought it was really interesting (not because of the info but more about how to figure it out).

Estimate the probability that a woman with a positive mammogram actually has breast cancer, even though she’s in a low-risk group: 40 to 50 years old, with no symptoms or family history of breast cancer.

Assume the following:

The probability that one of these women has breast cancer is 0.8 percent. If a woman has breast cancer, the probability is 90 percent that she will have a positive mammogram. If a woman does not have breast cancer, the probability is 7 percent that she will still have a positive mammogram. Imagine a woman who has a positive mammogram. What is the probability that she actually has breast cancer?

 
The OP is way off. Its not even right in the first place. .8% and 80% are very different things. Going on the OP's logic it should be between .8% and 90% not between 70% and 90%.

 
The OP is way off. Its not even right in the first place. .8% and 80% are very different things. Going on the OP's logic it should be between .8% and 90% not between 70% and 90%.
It made sense to me. .8 out of every 100 women will have breast cancer, testing positive 90% of the time. Out of the remaining 99.2 women who do not have cancer, 7% will still test positive.

 
The OP is way off. Its not even right in the first place. .8% and 80% are very different things. Going on the OP's logic it should be between .8% and 90% not between 70% and 90%.
What's way off? I think you're not understanding. If i spoon feed you then that takes the fun out of the problem. The probability of .8%-90% is not a definite answer. There is definitely a single number that you can derive //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
when you get done playin with us, i'd actually like to see how you work it out, so i can actually learn something on this site. i do math everyday, but not to that extent.

 
when you get done playin with us, i'd actually like to see how you work it out, so i can actually learn something on this site. i do math everyday, but not to that extent.
This. I just passed advanced stats with a 98%. I dont think Im the one who needs spoon feeding here.

 
1:10.64?

I haven't had a math class in a while... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif
So I take it this isn't right?

You've got to find the total number of women who test positive.

.8 x 90% = .72 women who have cancer and test positive

99.2 x 7% = 6.944 women who do not have cancer and test positive

-----------------

7.664 total women who test positive for cancer

Chances of it be a woman who actually has cancer is .72 in 7.664, or 1:10.6444444, so one in every 10.64 women who test positive actually have breast cancer.

 
So I take it this isn't right?
You've got to find the total number of women who test positive.

.8 x 90% = .72 women who have cancer and test positive

99.2 x 7% = 6.944 women who do not have cancer and test positive

-----------------

7.664 total women who test positive for cancer

Chances of it be a woman who actually has cancer is .72 in 7.664, or 1:10.6444444, so one in every 10.64 women who test positive actually have breast cancer.
That is exactly correct. I didnt realize at first it was a ratio. I thought you were just saying a random time lol.

Comes out to around 9%.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

FurbiesAndBeans

10+ year member
CarAudio.com Elite
Thread starter
FurbiesAndBeans
Joined
Location
Corona, CA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
22
Views
366
Last reply date
Last reply from
dumple
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top