Flat cone's and Square Subs. THE TRUTH

EXP. ED

Just some help facts for noobs and whom ever is interested.

spectrum:

30hz-1 khz (low frequency)

30hz-5khz ( low to mid freq.)

150hz-5khz(mid freq.)

700hz-10khz( upper mid/treble)

1-20khz( high freq.)

A balance in the spectrum is vital for a musical system. its NOT just SUBS(LF) extension

Battle of the cones:

An extreme case of a wide angle cone would be a flat disc my peeps. If light and thin, it wil possess very little ridigity. Due to that the sub will enter breakup at Lower frequencies.

Having a rigid flat diaphragm. the axial stiffness will increase and the frequency response rises or becomes higher, with irregularity may i add.

SQUARE..cough..kicker.cough

I think philips in holland was the company that figured out what was up with the straight sided cones. Square cones produce waves with an arc the is much shorter than those equivilent frequencies in the air, this has less effect on the output than resonace freq. So the result is phase cancellation effect with irregularities in the axial pressure response and polar distribution.

I would also like to mention the many materials for the diaphragm

honeycomb aluminum, aluminum, iron, plastic, bextrene, Polypropylene, even boron.( DO you know whats in your SUB)

Just make sure you know what you are buying. Little things make a big difference

Rice and Kellog where the one who invented the paper cone, stil used today with modification. A good place to start.

 
I think philips in holland was the company that figured out what was up with the straight sided cones. Square cones produce waves with an arc the is much shorter than those equivilent frequencies in the air, this has less effect on the output than resonace freq. So the result is phase cancellation effect with irregularities in the axial pressure response and polar distribution.
Do you (or they) have any evidence to back this claim up. Because frankly, as little a fan of square cones as I am, suggesting the diaphragm shape affects the amplitude of the wave it reproduces is absurd.
Now, if you are simply referring to stiffness in terms of a flat piston cone versus a square cone versus a traditional conical shaped cone, well then you are just making generalities about the cone's stiffness based only on its shape. The ultimate point to that arguement would be the stiffest cone always works best (no-brainer there), not that any one particular shape is always the best. If you are arguing conical shaped cones are inheritantly the strongest thus are best in respect to weight to strength, I would agree. But everything else is just generalizations.

flat cones are more rigid the conventional.
That is simply not true. Basic highschool geometry proves otherwise. A cone is stronger than a flat disc, hence the need for 'nomex honeycomb', carbon fiber and all the other exotic materials/techniques used to keep those flat cones rigid.
I would also like to mention the many materials for the diaphragm
honeycomb aluminum, aluminum, iron, plastic, bextrene, Polypropylene, even boron.( DO you know whats in your SUB)

Just make sure you know what you are buying. Little things make a big difference

Rice and Kellog where the one who invented the paper cone, stil used today with modification. A good place to start.
Im really not following your point. Here you seem to be suggesting paper cones are the best, better than using the 'honeycomb aluminum' (the honeycomb portion is not aluminum btw) and such, yet you also say flat cones are the strongest. When's the last time you saw a flat paper coned subwoofer? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
 
amazing, the square design means they can't have SQ or output without issues....hhhmmmmmm
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/word.gif.64b12e39f936af3b4fff38a1c0bd0244.gif

Just yesterday I was on a forum where some guy said square sub does not produce pure sine waves as well as circular cone subs. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eyebrow.gif.fe2c18d8720fe8c7eaed347b21ea05a5.gif I had to explain to him about sound waves //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cool.gif.3bcaf8f141236c00f8044d07150e34f7.gif

 
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/word.gif.64b12e39f936af3b4fff38a1c0bd0244.gif

Just yesterday I was on a forum where some guy said square sub does not produce pure sine waves as well as circular cone subs. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eyebrow.gif.fe2c18d8720fe8c7eaed347b21ea05a5.gif I had to explain to him about sound waves //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cool.gif.3bcaf8f141236c00f8044d07150e34f7.gif
But ofcourse. Square cone = square wave.

Duuuhhhh.......

 
Little did you know that BoominBeast could outwit the entire Kicker engineering team. Get this guy on the payroll !!
Thank god for the internet.
that's it, headed to the other building to clean out a guys desk, throwing him from the third floor, and making a fresh pot of coffee.... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 
EXP. EDJust some help facts for noobs and whom ever is interested.

spectrum:

30hz-1 khz (low frequency)

30hz-5khz ( low to mid freq.)

150hz-5khz(mid freq.)

700hz-10khz( upper mid/treble)

1-20khz( high freq.)

A balance in the spectrum is vital for a musical system. its NOT just SUBS(LF) extension

Battle of the cones:

An extreme case of a wide angle cone would be a flat disc my peeps. If light and thin, it wil possess very little ridigity. Due to that the sub will enter breakup at Lower frequencies.

Having a rigid flat diaphragm. the axial stiffness will increase and the frequency response rises or becomes higher, with irregularity may i add.

SQUARE..cough..kicker.cough

I think philips in holland was the company that figured out what was up with the straight sided cones. Square cones produce waves with an arc the is much shorter than those equivilent frequencies in the air, this has less effect on the output than resonace freq. So the result is phase cancellation effect with irregularities in the axial pressure response and polar distribution.

I would also like to mention the many materials for the diaphragm

honeycomb aluminum, aluminum, iron, plastic, bextrene, Polypropylene, even boron.( DO you know whats in your SUB)

Just make sure you know what you are buying. Little things make a big difference

Rice and Kellog where the one who invented the paper cone, stil used today with modification. A good place to start.


HUH

 
But ofcourse. Square cone = square wave.
Duuuhhhh.......
like I've even had to clarify to people...when we first introduced the L7, we had 8 people stand next to it, woofer laying flat on the floor. One on each side, and four in each corner. Hooked 1000 watts to it, the people on the flat sides of the driver heard it, the ones in the corner never heard a thing....//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eyebrow.gif.fe2c18d8720fe8c7eaed347b21ea05a5.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/naughty.gif.94359f346c0f1259df8038d60b41863e.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

BoominBeast

Banned
Thread starter
BoominBeast
Joined
Location
MI
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
65
Views
2,288
Last reply date
Last reply from
DBfan187
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top