Thank you for proving my point. You never had. This proves you believe the left if completely innocent.
So you basically ignore your own words, and the response to them, and utter some nonsense.
Why does that not shock me?
LOL...
In this post, you literally just said the court found him guilty of being a racist and ******. I proofed this never happened by not providing any proof he was convicted of these things. THAT'S THE POINT... there is no proof he was convicted! Damnit, are you that dense?
Have you been drinking, taking mood altering substances, having low blood sugar?
The courts have said he is a rap*st, and a rac*st. You claim he is not. Your claim does not supercede our court system, even if you claim to be buddy-buddy with a mayor.
You claim that i said he was a convicted ******. I AGAIN asked for proof of me making that claim. You AGAIN have failed to provide proof.
Sorry Goebbels, but making the same stupid claims over and over is not a proof.
Drop the hollow claims. Drop the beliefs. Drop the opinions. Drop the feelings. Show me the proof that the court decisions have be changed.
Slave owners didn't parade their black mistress out in public or show any PDA towards them. I show you proof and you try to dismiss it. I thought you only spoke on facts? It sounds like you are really pushing your own narrative on this. Nice try on trying to flip the script, though.
So PDA is a closer interaction than having s*x? Interesting.
So if the slave owners let it be known they were shagging their slaves, then they would not be racists?
Quite the leap, bud.
Trite? Do you even know what that means? You keep spewing the same BS as the left media. I, on the other hand, provide original verbiage from research I did on my own.
Yes. TRITE. "He's not racist because he has a black friend" Sounds like that idiot who claims not to be a ********* because he paid a couple of h00kers to do lesbian stuff with him in the room.
LOL...
This is how delusional you are. You literally just said, in this post, the courts convicted him of being a ****** and racist. Do you remember typing this "The court records prove he is a racist, and a rap*st." Really, Rob? So, here's your proof. Let's see you try to delete or edit this post, like you did with your others to make is sound like you never said it.
I am amazed that you have no idea you put a quote in there that you claim contains a word, which is not in the quote. You can't POSSIBLY be that dumb, can you?
PLEASE, tell me the number position of the word "convicted" in this sentence of only eleven words:
"The court records prove he is a racist, and a rap*st."
Is it word #1? #5? #3? #9? Be as accurate as possible. Spot the word; tell me where it is.
The TDS is strong with this one! Rob just proved, a few sentences ago, that he will never admit it.
Google Monica Lewinski.
Also Google Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, and Kathleen Willey. Then ask yourself why some of them were asked to settle out of court and/or why the courts were so quick to throw their case out? Seems to me there was some pretty heavy evidence if the Clintons were fighting to settle out of court.
I'm not sure what this rambing has to do with anything. Are you under the presumption that your sepecualtion of what happened is some kind of proof? While you deny that actual court decisions are not real?
I'd say you're a bot, but a bot would probably not post such incredibly stupid stuff here.
It's like you really have no clue what you say from one moment to the next.
That's nice, but let's try to stick with the topic. Why are you not questioning why the Clinton's refuse to be questioned about their dealing with Epstein. Why did the Clintons refuse to have their security detail accompany them to Epstein's island or while they were on Epstein's plane?
Why have less than 1% of the Epstein files been released by Trump's DOJ? You know. TRUMP who is the current president? TRUMP, whose name appears more than anyone else, aside from Jizztain maxwell and Epstein himself?
You know, the files that were supposed to be 100% released BY LAW well over a month ago?
Trump and his Admin have been violating that law since the deadline passed. if they are not bound by the law regarding the files, then the Clintons certianly are not bound by any law regarding the files.
Or would you like to suggest that the Trump Administration is above the law?
Which is it: The law matters, or the law doesn't matter? It can't be both.
Pick one.
I Just did prove them wrong.
Your personal claims don't prove a thing. It's really odd that a janitor would think he has the power to alter reality just by making a statement.
No thank you.
Show me proof that the court decisions have been changed or rescinded altogether.
So, tell me how you only believe in factual things, and that's why you believe it the Big Bang Theory. LOL....
Lemme guess: You believe "god" rolled up a ball of clay and blew on it to make Earth, then "god" made Adam and Eve, who banged and had kids, and those kids all had ****** to make more kids, who all had ****** to make more kids, for generations, and none of the endless ****** caused humans to become a genetic goulash.
And this all happened only 6,000-10,000 years ago?
I sure hope you aren't THAT poorly educated.
or are you...
