Current events discussion

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

NJ Transit now requires photo ID for certain reduced fares

NJ Transit will no longer accept reduced fare ID cards without photos starting Jan. 1, 2026.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Funny how they pick hat angle. There are other angles where she appears to make contact with officer. The media & Team Blue got what they wanted; an excuse to riot.

Funny, on lunch break coworker was watching msm showing that footage so I ended up two other clips and yeah let’s say it changed his perspective of the incident.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Swipe
Idk if anyone spotted the transtifa sticker on the back window

Oh so these two thought it would be a good idea to create this situation, film it for internet fame and then one them panics when it turns out there are consequences to their actions and tries to drive off while there is an officer in front of her car. Good job Team Minnesota.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Funny, on lunch break coworker was watching msm showing that footage so I ended up two other clips and yeah let’s say it changed his perspective of the incident.

I watched CNN during the BLM riots, they were definitely stoking the fires and will do so again. Team Blue loves a good riot.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Wow. I'm pretty sure Indiana is red state. So how about you whiney arse liberal "journalist" get off your lazy arses and book a flight to Indiana and start doing some reporting.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Funny, on lunch break coworker was watching msm showing that footage so I ended up two other clips and yeah let’s say it changed his perspective of the incident.

You know what's interesting is the other angles are changing people's perspectives, but some people's perspectives can't be changed because their minds were made up before the incident even happened.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

How did he shoot through the windshield if he was on the side of the vehicle?

Watch the video from the three vantage points, and you'll understand better than listening to Noem, Trump, or any of the other idiots claiming what happened in disregard of the video proof.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You're just arguing against what the law says. I dont make the laws. Go ***** at someone who cares. Officer isn't arrested and isn't being punished, so wtf are you rambling about?

"Arguing what the law says".

So you think what "the law says" has no relevance in the EXACT situation that the law describes, and that happened in MPLS?

Clearly what I said is correct as there's no charges on the officer

Annnddd, there we go. You think you are correct because you posted something, or had a thought.
That's not how reality on this planet, or in this solar system works. Maybe elsewhere is different.

You also said that George Floyd overdosed. Chauvin was charged four days later, and convicted of murder.
You might want to work on your command of the language, and how words that make laws matter.

And since you are able to work the computer today, how about showing me the post where I gave this advice: "So your advice to someone who's stopped in the middle of the road, surrounded by federal agents, is to hit the accelerator and clip one of the federal agents?" -Buck

I've looked in post history, and can't seem to find it.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

"Arguing what the law says".

So you think what "the law says" has no relevance in the EXACT situation that the law describes, and that happened in MPLS?

Annnddd, there we go. You think you are correct because you posted something, or had a thought.
That's not how reality on this planet, or in this solar system works. Maybe elsewhere is different.

You also said that George Floyd overdosed. Chauvin was charged four days later, and convicted of murder.
You might want to work on your command of the language, and how words that make laws matter.

And since you are able to work the computer today, how about showing me the post where I gave this advice: "So your advice to someone who's stopped in the middle of the road, surrounded by federal agents, is to hit the accelerator and clip one of the federal agents?" -Buck

I've looked in post history, and can't seem to find it.

What a bunch of gibberish

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What a bunch of gibberish

Of course it's "gibberish". It very clearly points out that you just throw shit at the wall, and hope it sticks.

Please, I implore you: SHOW ME THE POST WHERE I GAVE THE ADVICE THAT YOU CLAIMED I DID: "to someone who's stopped in the middle of the road, surrounded by federal agents, is to hit the accelerator and clip one of the federal agents?"
Go ahead, be truthful in your post. Back up your claim.

Feel free to add a cherry on top, and explain why you consider the words of the law irrelevant with regard to your own feelings, beliefs, claims. Do you have some type of diplomatic immunity that makes you not subject to the laws in out country?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Not that ANYONE here would actually watch this (It's not Trump telling you what to think), but it's interesting.

Oversight of Fraud and Misuse of Federal Funds in Minnesota: Part I - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

oversight.house.gov

Comer opens by claiming that fraud in MN has caused people to not get benefits they should get, which is not the case. People are not denied benefits if they are eligible.
Comer goes on to say that MN gets federal grants to pay for the programs, which is not true. Minnesota is a net-positive tax contributor, giving over $20 Billion more to the Fed than it gets back.
In expressing his "concern" about people not getting benefits, Comer fails to mention that Trump is the one who intends to cut funding to MN, which is what will actually will strip all ELIGIBLE people of benefits.

MN is net negative when it comes to taxes given to the feds, and funds received back. Without the $23 Billion in excess we give the feds, Comer's own state of Kentucky would not be funded. They'd be $23 Billion in the hole.
He forgot to mention that fact during his opening speech.
An interesting detail to forget, when one wants to paint a narrative, huh?

Maybe the GOP needs to fix their own shit, before they worry about others'.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Of course it's "gibberish". It very clearly points out that you just throw shit at the wall, and hope it sticks.

Please, I implore you: SHOW ME THE POST WHERE I GAVE THE ADVICE THAT YOU CLAIMED I DID: "to someone who's stopped in the middle of the road, surrounded by federal agents, is to hit the accelerator and clip one of the federal agents?"
Go ahead, be truthful in your post. Back up your claim.

Feel free to add a cherry on top, and explain why you consider the words of the law irrelevant with regard to your own feelings, beliefs, claims. Do you have some type of diplomatic immunity that makes you not subject to the laws in out country?

Are you high in estrogen? I asked you a question if that was your advice. It was a question, calm down lol

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Are you high in estrogen? I asked you a question if that was your advice. It was a question, calm down lol

You phrased it as if it was something I stated or inferred.

If I were to say to you: "So your advice to Floridians is to feed gators or crocks that come onto their property?", would you say "Where the F did you ever get an idea that I gave such advice?".

So I'll try it: "So Buck, it's your advice to shoot through the door at someone who is knocking, because you don't know them?"