Current events discussion

[shredder1 10+ year member]

At least I'm not a criminal who could have spent 10 years in prison.

So BEFORE pres-school would be BEFORE 4 years old. That leaves 1, 2, or 3. You git angry that I inferred 3, so now you are saying they could read and write at 1, or 2.
Bullshit.


If your kid was reading and writing at 1 or 2 years old, he or she would be in record books.
If you had more than one kid that did so, you'd be known worldwide.

A rarity like you are claiming would be documented.
Go ahead and share some of the proof, with names redacted.

What a shitshow response, you are confusing two people unless @deez283 indicated he was facing 10 yrs.

Man just slow down and enjoy life.

 

[shredder1 10+ year member]

Something for our Minnesota investigator/prosecutor to chew on

Mental illness and the need for intervention is real, but the judges in some locales just say... dismissed... "Nothing to see here". I know that same empathy is abundant in the left worldview. I have zero empathy for those utopians who want to wish it away. The way forward is accountability and dare I say draconian measures.
For judges as well...

I'm all for questioning "medical" authority but really? I bet if intentions and veiled threats were directed towards cronies or donors directly the fool would have been committed with or without legal representation. Its almost like the judges are inclined to lean towards the PD defense although the public trust is being violated.

The public trust doctrine or whatever it is called is a shitshow.

I tried to delete entire subsections, to post what I found but no... it was too voluminous to post... fukin' lawyers. That said the 12 or 13 main sections were also too huge and useless and worded in a way to necessitate the "clarity" given in the subsections... lmao. There's NO clarity anywhere in that mission statement.

That said this Judge was probably out their depth and rejected the prosecutorial assault and overreach.

I was overcharged once upon a time, prosecutorial overreach. My 10yr in prison deal (threat) evaporated into a dismissal once the statements were read into the record. Trials are anyone's right and the best way to slow down rabid deal makers (prosecutors)... haha.

 

[shredder1 10+ year member]

As stated by someone around here some responses just slow down replies. No fingers pointed or shade thrown.

It is what it is

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Another one of them damn Somalis, defrauding the system.
When will it end?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What a shitshow response, you are confusing two people unless @deez283 indicated he was facing 10 yrs.

Man just slow down and enjoy life.

I can't reference you in a post when I'm responding to him?
Multitasking is allowed here.

I'm enjoying it plenty. I just hand-fed a 6-point buck that decided to wander up my driveway.

 

[shredder1 10+ year member]

I can't reference you in a post when I'm responding to him?
Multitasking is allowed here.

I'm enjoying it plenty. I just hand-fed a 6-point buck that decided to wander up my driveway.

Mutitask away. You are reminiscent of a one arm paper hanger at this point. A buncha effort for little production and I'm a production guy.

How about responding to this?

Something for our Minnesota investigator/prosecutor to chew on

Mental illness and the need for intervention is real, but the judges in some locales just say... dismissed... "Nothing to see here". I know that same empathy is abundant in the left worldview. I have zero empathy for those utopians who want to wish it away. The way forward is accountability and dare I say draconian measures.
For judges as well...

I'm all for questioning "medical" authority but really? I bet if intentions and veiled threats were directed towards cronies or donors directly the fool would have been committed with or without legal representation. Its almost like the judges are inclined to lean towards the PD defense although the public trust is being violated.

The public trust doctrine or whatever it is called is a shitshow.

I tried to delete entire subsections, to post what I found but no... it was too voluminous to post... fukin' lawyers. That said the 12 or 13 main sections were also too huge and useless and worded in a way to necessitate the "clarity" given in the subsections... lmao. There's NO clarity anywhere in that mission statement.

That said this Judge was probably out their depth and rejected the prosecutorial assault and overreach.

I was overcharged once upon a time, prosecutorial overreach. My 10yr in prison deal (threat) evaporated into a dismissal once the statements were read into the record. Trials are anyone's right and the best way to slow down rabid deal makers (prosecutors)... haha.

Weigh in my bruh... got any useful input?

The court system is a unenforceable shitshow and Judges are either invested or clueless.

 

[shredder1 10+ year member]

Nuance your response carefully

 

[deez283 10+ year member]

As stated by someone around here some responses just slow down replies. No fingers pointed or shade thrown.

It is what it is

Yeah, it's a thing.

Very predictable.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Mutitask away. You are reminiscent of a one arm paper hanger at this point. A buncha effort for little production and I'm a production guy.

How about responding to this?

Something for our Minnesota investigator/prosecutor to chew on

Mental illness and the need for intervention is real, but the judges in some locales just say... dismissed... "Nothing to see here". I know that same empathy is abundant in the left worldview. I have zero empathy for those utopians who want to wish it away. The way forward is accountability and dare I say draconian measures.
For judges as well...

I'm all for questioning "medical" authority but really? I bet if intentions and veiled threats were directed towards cronies or donors directly the fool would have been committed with or without legal representation. Its almost like the judges are inclined to lean towards the PD defense although the public trust is being violated.

The public trust doctrine or whatever it is called is a shitshow.

I tried to delete entire subsections, to post what I found but no... it was too voluminous to post... fukin' lawyers. That said the 12 or 13 main sections were also too huge and useless and worded in a way to necessitate the "clarity" given in the subsections... lmao. There's NO clarity anywhere in that mission statement.

That said this Judge was probably out their depth and rejected the prosecutorial assault and overreach.

I was overcharged once upon a time, prosecutorial overreach. My 10yr in prison deal (threat) evaporated into a dismissal once the statements were read into the record. Trials are anyone's right and the best way to slow down rabid deal makers (prosecutors)... haha.

Weigh in my bruh... got any useful input?

The court system is a unenforceable shitshow and Judges are either invested or clueless.

Respond to what?
An uncited/unlinked screen shot with a bunch of rambling to go along with it?
I have no idea what you are talking about, nor the relevance to anything being discussed here.

Mission statement? 13 subsections? violations of public trust?

This reminds me of a 5 page handwritten community complaint I have on file. NO idea what the person was even trying to allege.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Wow what happened the Mamdani effect wore off ? He was very vocal support during his campaign and telling trump supporters to leave New York if they don’t like it? Out of touch liberal elite….

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[deez283 10+ year member]

If your kid was reading and writing at 1 or 2 years old, he or she would be in record books.
If you had more than one kid that did so, you'd be known worldwide.

Dude you are such a lying sack of shit.
Not once did I say this and if you can't prove it, that means you are a lying sack of shit that can't be taken serious.

Why do you twist things around so much?
Like I've seen other say over and over "you keep moving the goal post"

It's a waist of time even trying to talk to people like you.
No wonder you can't see fake news for what it is.. It's is because you behave the same way.
Always taking somebody's words and twist them to make them look bad, or try and prove you're right, or to win a debate.

So to sum things up, You are a lying sack of shit.