Current events discussion

Pretty clear?
Tell us all where in the post you see it.
Or maybe lay off the hooch, so you can see clearly.
Here's the post:
View attachment 69586
If you are saying there was a court case that proved he was a ******, then you are saying he was convicted. Or, do you not know what your own words mean.

Go look at the court case yourself. You obviously don't believe the links and quotes I've provided multiple times.
I looked at your links. None of them said anything showing proof he is a racist. Did you read your links? Obviously, you did not.

More repetition, no proof.
The staple of the right wing: Lie until it becomes a truth.
So, you're giving in that you don't have proof to back up your claim? So, now you admit you're a liar.


I said two wires touching are not "bridged".
I said a monoblock car amp cannot be bridged to itself to make more power.
I said a mono op amp cannot have multiple outputs.
I said connecting mono speaker leads to a terminal block doesn't make multiple outputs from those mono wires.
I said there are no circuit symbols that show multiple outputs from a mono amp.
Shall I continue?

If your memory is this shitty, you should stop relying on it to claim things about me.
It only serves to make you look dumber.
The shitty memory is from the person who keeps changing his story, like what you are doing. Show me where I ever said two wires connected together is a bridge. You really have no idea how a mono block amp, with two outputs, really works, do you.

I'm guessing you are not that knowledgeable in car audio. With this being true, I suggest you stop arguing car audio. All you do is see a topic then google it. We get it, you're only here troll people in the Current Events thread.

Let me teach you something. Consider this a gift from a Master Certified MECP installer who has been professionally installing for over 12 years and managed some of the most well-known shops in the US. I believe I provided enough photos to prove my knowledge and skills.

A mono block, with two outputs, has two outputs to make wiring to subwoofers easier. You can one 2-ohm sub and connect it to one output, then connect another 2-ohm sub to the other output. In some cases, those outputs are bridged internally so the amps circuitry will actually see 1-ohm. Because the amp sees 1-ohm, it will cause the amp to produce more power. In other words, the amp technically bridges itself to create more power. You're not bridging the outputs, so who is? It's the amp.

Also, you are changing your words, and the more you change your words, the more intelligent you sound.
 
The court decision says he's a ******. That can be determined in civil court, bud.
If you want to dispute that, you have to take it up with the court, otherwise the decision has not changed.

Let me know when you get the court decision changed or overturned.
Well, lookie here... Rob again states it was the court's decision that Trump is a ******. If the "Court" made that decision, then that means he was convicted. I'm going to give you the benefit of a doubt that you are too ignorant to know what a "Courts Decision" actually means. A "Courts Decision" means you were either convicted or not convicted. If it's the court's decision that you are guilty, then that means you are now convicted.

The "Court" is the individual, or individuals, who have the responsibility of providing the verdict. In Trump's case, the Jury had that responsibility. Not the judge. The jury did not say he was guilty of ****. Therefore, he was not convicted. There, now you are smarter.
 
Well, lookie here... Rob again states it was the court's decision that Trump is a ******. If the "Court" made that decision, then that means he was convicted. I'm going to give you the benefit of a doubt that you are too ignorant to know what a "Courts Decision" actually means. A "Courts Decision" means you were either convicted or not convicted. If it's the court's decision that you are guilty, then that means you are now convicted.

The "Court" is the individual, or individuals, who have the responsibility of providing the verdict. In Trump's case, the Jury had that responsibility. Not the judge. The jury did not say he was guilty of ****. Therefore, he was not convicted. There, now you are smarter.
Technically, he was find liable for SA and defamation.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,708
Views
443,883
Last reply date
Last reply from
RobGMN
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top