Hello Stocker.
Please do a little more research. You will see that Q1 is pretty much always lower than Q4 and Q4 is always lower than Q3, which is always the highest. That's because people spend more money during the holidays. It's basic economics. Not mad at ya. I just wanted to point that out.
I see you all are talking about who should be taxed and who shouldn't? What I will say is going to be a gut wrencher, but it's a fact.
If you put a high tax on corporations, the only people that will be negatively affected are the consumers and the employees. Corporations rely on stock investments. If a corporation doesn't meet their budgeted goals, their stocks drop. If they are taxed higher, this affects their goal. So, they end up raising their prices and cutting operation costs. This leads to pay cuts and layoffs. If you tax them less, the corporations will put more into their employees and keep costs lower. Just think if it was your corporation. You would never want your company to show a negative growth. You would lose all of your investors.
Yeah, the knee on the neck while he was lying face down on the pavement, with his hands cuffed behind his back, had nothing to do with it.Floyd wasn't killed by a cop. It was his own drug problem and his health.
"Put more into their employees", lol.I see you all are talking about who should be taxed and who shouldn't? What I will say is going to be a gut wrencher, but it's a fact.
If you put a high tax on corporations, the only people that will be negatively affected are the consumers and the employees. Corporations rely on stock investments. If a corporation doesn't meet their budgeted goals, their stocks drop. If they are taxed higher, this affects their goal. So, they end up raising their prices and cutting operation costs. This leads to pay cuts and layoffs. If you tax them less, the corporations will put more into their employees and keep costs lower. Just think if it was your corporation. You would never want your company to show a negative growth. You would lose all of your investors.
I watched the videos many, many times. I saw nothing the police don't do on a daily basis still to this day. Even the coroner said there were no life threatening injuries. Perhaps you think drugs and bad health are just made up things? Perhaps resisting is just common for left wing people. Perhaps non-compliance with lawful orders is forgivable. Maybe we don't need uniformed persons bothering us when we break the laws. Cops should only be around when something affects you personally.Yeah, the knee on the neck while he was lying face down on the pavement, with his hands cuffed behind his back, had nothing to do with it.
The alternate reality you live in is a really weird place.
GATT & NAFTA. Certainly, you're not going to suggest that corporations passed those tax cuts along to lowly consumers. If GATT & NAFTA were indeed passed along to consumers, why can't other other supply-side tax cuts be passed along to consumers or invested into the economy?ROFL. Know how I know that you're talking out your ***? Please point me towards the significant cuts made to the the corporate tax rate under Clinton. Thanks.
lol....and Art Laffer is donkey brains in human form. Not surprised that he doesn't know what the hell he's talking about either.
Crazy thing is we all know if George was white nobody would care.I watched the videos many, many times. I saw nothing the police don't do on a daily basis still to this day. Even the coroner said there were no life threatening injuries. Perhaps you think drugs and bad health are just made up things? Perhaps resisting is just common for left wing people. Perhaps non-compliance with lawful orders is forgivable. Maybe we don't need uniformed persons bothering us when we break the laws. Cops should only be around when something affects you personally.
He wasn't "face" down he was in a prone position with his head facing his right side. His nose and mouth were unobstructed. At times his right shoulder and chest were elevated off the ground.
I am sure with the following, none of them contributed to Floyds death. It HAD to be the cop because Rob said so on a car audio forum.
"Signed by Dr. Andrew M. Baker, it says Floyd had tested positive for the novel coronavirus on April 3. A post-mortem nasal swab confirmed that diagnosis. The report notes that because a positive result for coronavirus can persist for weeks after the disease has resolved, "the result most likely reflects asymptomatic but persistent ... positivity from previous infection."
In addition to fentanyl and methamphetamine, the toxicology report from the autopsy showed that Floyd also had cannabinoids in his system when he died.
Floyd also had heart disease, hypertension and sickle cell trait — a mostly asymptomatic form of the more serious sickle cell disease, an inherited blood disorder that primarily affects African Americans."
Crazy thing is we all know if George was white nobody would careI watched the videos many, many times. I saw nothing the police don't do on a daily basis still to this day. Even the coroner said there were no life threatening injuries. Perhaps you think drugs and bad health are just made up things? Perhaps resisting is just common for left wing people. Perhaps non-compliance with lawful orders is forgivable. Maybe we don't need uniformed persons bothering us when we break the laws. Cops should only be around when something affects you personally.
He wasn't "face" down he was in a prone position with his head facing his right side. His nose and mouth were unobstructed. At times his right shoulder and chest were elevated off the ground.
I am sure with the following, none of them contributed to Floyds death. It HAD to be the cop because Rob said so on a car audio forum.
"Signed by Dr. Andrew M. Baker, it says Floyd had tested positive for the novel coronavirus on April 3. A post-mortem nasal swab confirmed that diagnosis. The report notes that because a positive result for coronavirus can persist for weeks after the disease has resolved, "the result most likely reflects asymptomatic but persistent ... positivity from previous infection."
In addition to fentanyl and methamphetamine, the toxicology report from the autopsy showed that Floyd also had cannabinoids in his system when he died.
Floyd also had heart disease, hypertension and sickle cell trait — a mostly asymptomatic form of the more serious sickle cell disease, an inherited blood disorder that primarily affects African Americans."
That's the thing many people don't understand about taxes, most taxes are paid by the underclass regardless of who you actually tax because the wealthy class has the ability to pass the taxes down to less economically empowered people. It's been that way, for thousands of years.I see you all are talking about who should be taxed and who shouldn't? What I will say is going to be a gut wrencher, but it's a fact.
If you put a high tax on corporations, the only people that will be negatively affected are the consumers and the employees. Corporations rely on stock investments. If a corporation doesn't meet their budgeted goals, their stocks drop. If they are taxed higher, this affects their goal. So, they end up raising their prices and cutting operation costs. This leads to pay cuts and layoffs. If you tax them less, the corporations will put more into their employees and keep costs lower. Just think if it was your corporation. You would never want your company to show a negative growth. You would lose all of your investors.
Supply-side worked great under Clinton - see GATT & NAFTA. WW2 would be another good example, although that happened before we really recognized that supply-side was a thing. Industrialization is another great example of how increased supply results in economic growth. What about bailouts? I'm not a big fan of bailouts, but the certainly reverse economic downturns.Looking for data on the last time trickle-down worked.
Year range, administration, etc.
GATT & NAFTA. Certainly, you're not going to suggest that corporations passed those tax cuts along to lowly consumers. If GATT & NAFTA were indeed passed along to consumers, why can't other other supply-side tax cuts be passed along to consumers or invested into the economy?
Laffer isn't the genius many claim he is - ie the Laffer Curve is just applying common logic. However, he certainly knows what supply-side economics looks like, afterall, he is generally considered the father of supply side economics.
Clinton cut taxes for small businesses. I know those aren't the evil bad guys corporations are, but still a supply side cut.