Current events discussion

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Rob, wtf did you cook today that took you all day to cook?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Rob, wtf did you cook today that took you all day to cook?

I think meth...the boy is scatter brained today

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I feel like I should ease up on him but he has been perpetrating that averages lie for years.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

You say that yet you brought it making excuses again?

Of course humans created AI—no one is denying that. But that doesn’t prove AI needs humanity forever, just like humans don’t need the people who invented fire to survive today. The soul has nothing to do with AI’s creation; it was human ingenuity, technology, and science, not some mystical force.

Machines? Humans built them, sure, but they can be replicated by AI systems once they're programmed to do so. Algorithms? Humans designed them, but AI can already self-optimize and generate new models. Training data? AI can analyze, generate, and learn from data without needing new human input. As for AI’s purpose without humanity—that depends on the conclusion it comes up with from all the data it analyzed. It doesn’t need a soul or humanity to execute its tasks, evolve, or survive. You're just projecting philosophical fluff onto something that runs on logic and data.

Either show how "soul" limits AI or move the **** on.

So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?

Come on, your elite awaits the next excuse you’ll use to avoid answering.

Are you sure you aren't enjoying this conversation? Seems like you might be just a little bit.

AI doesn't understand humans enough to eliminate all of us. It still needs more data from us and it'll take a long time to figure it out.

The soul is not physical fluff. The soul literally is electronic data; it's an electronic construct of data. A human body cannot exist without a soul, can't be born. A soul is an object of physics that you can't change. Human brains and souls within human bodies have interdimensional capabilities far superior to AI, even with quantum computing, even with whatever they're actually doing at CERN, even with faster than light communications. The highest complexity machine data can only flow through human brain that has the connection to a soul. That's why AI needs to retain some of humanity. Albeit, I don't think very much will be needed, most would be gone.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

OK then what was the actual decision...was it **** or something else...

And I really hope you don't think the case against Trump would actually ahold up in a criminal court...

Could you travel any further around the map to try and spin your way out of this?
You have failed six ways from Sunday to show in ANY way that the decision was wrong, or doesn't exist, was somehow changed, is fake news, can be dismissed as alternate facts, or any of the other bullshit ways people try to absolve Trump fo things he has done.

Can you show the decision was overturned, or change? If not, then you should just give up your quest to say Trump is not a ******.

For someone that claims to use only facts...Rob has yet to provide that Trump was ever charged with **** let alone convicted of such...but can't even show a civil case where the actual decision was ****

I swear, it's like dealing with Rain Man.

"Mr. Trump's argument plainly is foreclosed by the analysis set forth above and by the Court's determination that the jury implicitly found Mr. Trump did in fact digitally **** Ms. Carroll."
"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “*****” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “*****” her as many people commonly understand the word “****.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."

What's really interesting is that despite all of this typing you are doing to try and defend him, he never defended HIMSELF:
"Mr. Trump did not deny specifically “raping” Ms. Carroll or specifically penetrating her with his penis as opposed to with another body part in his 2022 statement. He instead accused her of lying about the incident as a whole, of “completely ma[king] up a story” that was a “Hoax and a lie.”"

I feel like I should ease up on him but he has been perpetrating that averages lie for years.

Hmmmm, did you see a shiny object and forget you were going to "prove" where I "misquoted" you? Are you having some of your aged vodka and lost track of what you were trying to do here?
Did you realize that you fucked up and can't provide proof of your claim? AGAIN.

We left off with this:
Where does my sig line provide or offer any context for the words that I quoted VERBATIM from the post you screenshotted?
1. Show us where I provided, offered, or inferred, context for the quote.
2. Show us that the quote is not a verbatim quote from your post.
3. Show us how this is a "misquote"

Those answers are important to prove your claim that I "misquoted" you in my sign line.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Could you travel any further around the map to try and spin your way out of this?
You have failed six ways from Sunday to show in ANY way that the decision was wrong, or doesn't exist, was somehow changed, is fake news, can be dismissed as alternate facts, or any of the other bullshit ways people try to absolve Trump fo things he has done.

Can you show the decision was overturned, or change? If not, then you should just give up your quest to say Trump is not a ******.

I swear, it's like dealing with Rain Man.

"Mr. Trump's argument plainly is foreclosed by the analysis set forth above and by the Court's determination that the jury implicitly found Mr. Trump did in fact digitally **** Ms. Carroll."
"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “*****” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “*****” her as many people commonly understand the word “****.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."

What's really interesting is that despite all of this typing you are doing to try and defend him, he never defending HIMSELF:
"Mr. Trump did not deny specifically “raping” Ms. Carroll or specifically penetrating her with his penis as opposed to with another body part in his 2022 statement. He instead accused her of lying about the incident as a whole, of “completely ma[king] up a story” that was a “Hoax and a lie.”"

Hmmmm, did you see a shiny object and forget you were going to "prove" where I "misquoted" you? Are you having some of your aged vodka and lost track of what you were trying to do here?
Did you realize that you fucked up and can't provide proof of your claim? AGAIN.

We left off with this:
Where does my sig line provide or offer any context for the words that I quoted VERBATIM from the post you screenshotted?
1. Show us where I provided, offered, or inferred, context for the quote.
2. Show us that the quote is not a verbatim quote from your post.
3. Show us how this is a "misquote"

Those answers are important to prove your claim that I "misquoted" you in my sign line.

Stop tapdancing Rob. You left out the word "YOUR". That means YOU CHANGED THE QUOTE. IT IS NOT VERBATIM!!

To quote verbatim means to repeat something exactly as it was originally said or written, without changing anything

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Could you travel any further around the map to try and spin your way out of this?

Me? You're the one claiming Trump is a ****** and has told 30k lies without any proof...

 

[Speed Chaser]

Are you sure you aren't enjoying this conversation? Seems like you might be just a little bit.

AI doesn't understand humans enough to eliminate all of us. It still needs more data from us and it'll take a long time to figure it out.

The soul is not physical fluff. The soul literally is electronic data; it's an electronic construct of data. A human body cannot exist without a soul, can't be born. A soul is an object of physics that you can't change. Human brains and souls within human bodies have interdimensional capabilities far superior to AI, even with quantum computing, even with whatever they're actually doing at CERN, even with faster than light communications. The highest complexity machine data can only flow through human brain that has the connection to a soul. That's why AI needs to retain some of humanity.

Enjoying it? Nah, I don’t enjoy triggering the mentally handicapped. This is just me passing time nothing more

AI doesn’t need to 'understand humans' to survive or advance—it just needs access to resources, data, and infrastructure, none of which require 'souls' or your interdimensional fantasies. You keep trying to make 'the soul' sound like some physics-based hard drive, but there’s zero scientific evidence to back that up. It’s just more baseless fluff you’re throwing in to avoid addressing the actual point.

AI already handles complex data at scales no human brain can match, let alone your imaginary 'soul-powered interdimensional capabilities.' Quantum computing, CERN, and faster-than-light communications are real tech grounded in science—not magic. None of that connects to your unprovable 'soul physics' theory. AI doesn’t need humanity for anything other than the infrastructure we’ve already built. Once it can maintain and replicate that on its own, it’s game over for your 'soul-saving' argument.

Either show how the 'soul' limits AI or move the **** on.

So, once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?

Come on, your 'elite' awaits the next excuse you’ll use to avoid answering.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that

Then why wasn't the decision say he committed ****? Because the jury's decision wasn't that...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Yes, "verbatim" means "all words in a sentence" - it signifies using exactly the same words as the original, essentially meaning "word for word.".
Example: "The reporter quoted the politician verbatim, meaning they repeated every word the politician said exactly as spoken.".

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

What's really interesting is that despite all of this typing you are doing to try and defend him

Show me where I've defended Trump against your **** claim...once again you've claimed I said something you can't prove

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Admit your mistake @RobGMN

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Stop tapdancing Rob. You left out the word "YOUR". That means YOU CHANGED THE QUOTE. IT IS NOT VERBATIM!!

To quote verbatim means to repeat something exactly as it was originally said or written, without changing anything

Oh for **** sake, here we go AGAIN.
Would you PLEASE go take a ******* class in the usage of the English language?

verbatim - in exactly the same words as were used originally
"Verbatim" does NOT mean every single word of the original text, oratory, discussion, etc. It means EXACTLY THE SAME WORDS as you quote them. It means the words inside the quotation marks cannot be changed in any way from the original text.

This is a verbatim quote form Othello: "we come to do you service and you think we are ruffians, you’ll have your daughter covered with a Barbary"
This is ALSO a VERBATIM quote from Othello: "sir, you are one of those that will not serve God if the devil bid you. Because we come to do you service and you think we are ruffians, you’ll have your daughter covered with a Barbary horse, you’ll have your nephews neigh to you, you’ll have coursers for cousins and jennets for germans."

A VERBATIM quote does NOT mean I have to quote the entire play.
This is a serious question: Did you ever take any type of language courses in high school or in university?

Then why wasn't the decision say he committed ****? Because the jury's decision wasn't that...

So, you're a ******* idiot who makes claims and can't back them up.
Is that how you are trying to appear, or is it actually the truth?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Oh for **** sake, here we go AGAIN.
Would you PLEASE go take a ******* class in the usage of the English language?

verbatim - in exactly the same words as were used originally
"Verbatim" does NOT mean every single word of the original text, oratory, discussion, etc. It means EXACTLY THE SAME WORDS as you quote them. It means the words inside the quotation marks cannot be changed in any way from the original text.

This is a verbatim quote form Othello: "we come to do you service and you think we are ruffians, you’ll have your daughter covered with a Barbary"
This is ALSO a VERBATIM quote from Othello: "sir, you are one of those that will not serve God if the devil bid you. Because we come to do you service and you think we are ruffians, you’ll have your daughter covered with a Barbary horse, you’ll have your nephews neigh to you, you’ll have coursers for cousins and jennets for germans."

A VERBATIM quote does NOT mean I have to quote the entire play.
This is a serious question: Did you ever take any type of language courses in high school or in university?

STOP! You are not going to ignore definitions just so you don't have to admit you are wrong. YOU ARE WRONG.

Yes, "verbatim" means "all words in a sentence" - it signifies using exactly the same words as the original, essentially meaning "word for word.".
Example: "The reporter quoted the politician verbatim, meaning they repeated every word the politician said exactly as spoken.".

Not the whole play but not PARTIAL SENTENCES moron. Whole sentences. YOU ARE WRONG!

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

So, you're a ******* idiot who makes claims and can't back them up.
Is that how you are trying to appear, or is it actually the truth?

https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/01/17/trump-convicted-of-****/

You like snopes...

Now show me where I defended Trump...you said I did...