Current events discussion

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Ever heard of the term "polysemous"? It means a word can have multiple definitions.
The result is that every definition does not apply at all times. But if you think it does, can you explain to us all how procreation MUST involve ****** activity, when there have been 8 million test tube babies since 1977.

Are you suggesting those 8 million people do not exist by procreation?
Answer the questions.
And while you're at it, tell me how both of these definitions can apply at the same time to a singular thing
bark- the characteristic short loud cry of a dog; the tough exterior covering of a woody root or stem



You said it was locked down by being locked down. Not much of an explanation of HOW.
I asked you the question in post 1,245, and in post 1,305 you said you answered it.
But you didn't have any posts between 1,245 and 1,305.
How exactly did you answer my question without posting anything?

Never said that, never would. Look at my post history and you'll see that i call out people who are full of sh*t, and I speak the truth with facts, proof, evidence.
As opposed to guys who claim they have been resurrected, that Trump is not a liar, that Trump won the election, that Biden broke the law by selling oil from the SPR, that bones do not have nerves in them, that the Republicans had nothing to do with Roe v Wade being overturned, that monoblock amps have multiple outputs, that Biden sets gas prices, that people didn't drive less during the pandemic lockdowns, that Trump oversaw the best US economy in the history of the world, that Trump only "allegedly" had classified documents at Mara Lago, that Trump won the election, that the insurrectionists on Jan 6th were "tourists" who were only "wearing hats and waving flags", that the events of Jan 6th didn't HAPPEN.

All of those things have been said by people here, and it's the tip of the iceberg.
How do YOU consider people who say stupid sh*t like that?

Nope. I've never seen a SOTU address.

Show me where I am incorrect.
If a pregnant woman wants an abortion, but the Republicans have made it so she cannot, would you agree they are forcing her to continue with a pregnancy by taking away her right to end it?
Answer with a yes or no, please.

OK. So a pro-lifer who smokes and gets lung cancer from smoking should just live with the consequences, and not be allowed surgery or medicine to deal with it. They played Russian Roulette and lost. Correct?
A kid who crashes his bike going over a jump and breaks his arm should be required to let it heal in situ with no setting of the bone, no cast, no painkillers. Live with the consequences. Correct?
A priest who diddles a kid and gets worked over or even shot by the irate father should just live (or die) with the injuries. Correct?
Or are those "living with the consequences" examples unfair because they don't gel with your rule?
Answer the questions, please.

I assume you mean it is very divisive.
So I'll ask this: Why do you think the federal government should decide what we get to do with our bodies?
I don't know you and I don't know your situation, but what if YOU got cancer? Would you be OK with the gov't telling you you may not have treatment for any number of reasons (age, cause of cancer, type of cancer, cost of treatment, skin color, ***, etc)?
Answer the question honestly, please.

Are you a test tube baby?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

This is so terrifyingly reminiscent of how evil and corrupted govs or regimes target their civilian political opposition. Big gov is illegally spying on you and punishing people for completely legal activities so that the big gov can maintain unwarranted power to enforce a sinister agenda:

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

If a pregnant woman wants an abortion, but the Republicans have made it so she cannot, would you agree they are forcing her to continue with a pregnancy by taking away her right to end it?
Answer with a yes or no, please.

Why are you still arguing this? There are states where abortion is legal. This means she can have an abortion. Overturning Roe vs Wade means it is up to the states now. This is the society we live in Rob, don't like it, move to Canada.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

11 Pages this guy has been going on about Republicans "forcing reproduction".

How about who is forcing his one track mind.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

And while you're at it, tell me how both of these definitions can apply at the same time to a singular thing
bark- the characteristic short loud cry of a dog; the tough exterior covering of a woody root or stem

And here comes more off topic nonsense to "prove" you're "right"

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

11 Pages this guy has been going on about Republicans "forcing reproduction".

How about who is forcing his one track mind.

He has a fetish I think

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

11 Pages this guy has been going on about Republicans "forcing reproduction".

How about who is forcing his one track mind.

How many pages have you spent denying Trump had classified docs at Mara Lago, claiming that bones do not have nerves in them, claiming that Biden broke the law in using the SPR, claiming your monoblock amp has multiple outputs, that averages are fake numbers used only for lazy and nefarious means, that two wires touching each other are "bridged", that homosexuality is a choice?

What forces your one track mind to simply deny facts that prove your beliefs wrong?

And here comes more off topic nonsense to "prove" you're "right"

"Off topic nonsense"? YOU are the one who decided to use a definition of a word to prove your belief, only to find out the definition DISproved your belief.
Now that you find out your tactic failed, it's "off topic nonsense".
Typical.

Are you a test tube baby?

I hope that's not a real question, given you know my approximate age and the fact that the first successful IVF happened in 1977.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

"Off topic nonsense"? YOU are the one who decided to use a definition of a word to prove your belief, only to find out the definition DISproved your belief.
Now that you find out your tactic failed, it's "off topic nonsense".
Typical

As much as you need to be "right"...You're the one that can't comprehend that procreation. Isn't just birth

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

As much as you need to be "right"...You're the one that can't comprehend that procreation. Isn't just birth

Says the guy who thinks procreation must include ****** activity.
So tell us: If procreation must include ****** activity, are test tube babies NOT a result of procreation?
Oops. Answering that simple question will prove you wrong. 'Better avoid it.
All the laughing emojis in the world can't cover for your lack of understanding.

A presidential candidate who wants to free insurrectionists who attacked our nation's Capitol Building in a coup attempt.
What a huge pile of sh*t this guy is.
He and all of the garbage in this country that supports him should be sent halfway to the moon.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Hezbollah Fires More Than 100 Rockets Into Israel, Drawing Retaliation

The Lebanese militant group Hezbollah fired more than 100 rockets into northern Israel on Tuesday morning, according to Israel’s military.

dnyuz.com

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Says the guy who thinks procreation must include ****** activity.
So tell us: If procreation must include ****** activity, are test tube babies NOT a result of procreation?

Even test tube babies are derived from a sperm and egg...just like a natural conception...so you're comparison doesn't help your argument the Republicans are "forcing procreation"

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

House Democrats Draft Legislation That Would Make It A Hate Crime To Eat At Chick-Fil-A
U.S.· Jun 12, 2018 · BabylonBee.com
Click here to view this article with reduced ads.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

He has a fetish I think

Bluetooth and vibrates

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Even test tube babies are derived from a sperm and egg...just like a natural conception...so you're comparison doesn't help your argument the Republicans are "forcing procreation"

But there is no ****** activity which you insisted must happen for procreation, because it is part of the definition YOU shared with us.
Are you now walking back on insisting that ALL parts of the definition must be satisfied for it to be considered "procreation"?
Is it possible to have procreation without ****** activity? Yes, or no?
Answer the questions, please.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

But there is no ****** activity which you insisted must happen for procreation

Ok...I'll bite...where did I say that?