Current events discussion

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Ever heard of the term "polysemous"? It means a word can have multiple definitions.
The result is that every definition does not apply at all times. But if you think it does, can you explain to us all how procreation MUST involve ****** activity, when there have been 8 million test tube babies since 1977.

A sperm mixing with an egg is ****** activity within itself, like no matter the environment, because the cells themselves are sexually reproducing, whether inside or outside of any environment named. So, yea, all procreation IS fundamentally ****** activity. You cannot have procreation without ****** activity.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

A sperm mixing with an egg is ****** activity within itself, like no matter the environment, because the cells themselves are sexually reproducing, whether inside or outside of any environment named. So, yea, all procreation IS fundamentally ****** activity. You cannot have procreation without ****** activity.

You're referencing "****** reproduction". Don't confuse that with "****** activity".
And no, ALL procreation is not fundamentally ****** activity.
Unless you want to discount the 80-odd vertebrate species and who knows how many invertebrates that procreate through parthenogenesis.

Ok...I'll bite...where did I say that?

That would be here:

You said the definition is absolutely correct. And have repeatedly argued that procreation is not just the begetting and generation of young, but ****** activity, etc.
Do you want to walk that back now, or stick to your guns that all four parts of the definition must be in play for there to be procreation?
Make a decision and share it here.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

You said the definition is absolutely correct

So you're changing your understanding of the definition to try arguing a different point?

And that quote doesn't show me saying what you claimed I did buddy...nice try at spinning though

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

How many pages have you spent denying Trump had classified docs at Mara Lago, claiming that bones do not have nerves in them, claiming that Biden broke the law in using the SPR, claiming your monoblock amp has multiple outputs, that averages are fake numbers used only for lazy and nefarious means, that two wires touching each other are "bridged", that homosexuality is a choice?

However many there are in direct response to you dragging the conversations on.

What forces your one track mind to simply deny facts that prove your beliefs wrong?

I don't do that. You do.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

You're referencing "****** reproduction". Don't confuse that with "****** activity".
And no, ALL procreation is not fundamentally ****** activity.
Unless you want to discount the 80-odd vertebrate species and who knows how many invertebrates that procreate through parthenogenesis.

That doesn't have a damn thing to do with test tube babies or republicans forcing procreation. You're literally a turd a bro. Parthenogenesis is ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION YOU MORON. Don't confuse ****** reproduction and asexual reproduction. I'm referring to ****** activity and ****** reproduction, because the context we're talking about is HUMANS, NOT BUGS or lizards or some small organisms or plants. We aren't talking about invertebrates. We're talking about people that have spines, unlike you.

"****** reproduction involves the fusion of gametes from two parents, while asexual reproduction involves the creation of offspring without the involvement of gametes from another individual. Procreation, on the other hand, is a more specific term that refers to the act of producing offspring through ****** intercourse."

Reproduction vs Procreation: When To Use Each One In Writing

Reproduction and procreation are two terms that are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct meanings. So, what is the difference between

thecontentauthority.com

Procreation is almost always used in the context of ****** activity between humans, especially in a political thread, maggot. Nobody is forcing anybody to have ****** intercourse like you compared abortion to, you absolute dimwit.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Watch Live: Hur Confirms Biden Lied About Classified Docs During Contentious Hearing | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So you're changing your understanding of the definition to try arguing a different point?

And that quote doesn't show me saying what you claimed I did buddy...nice try at spinning though

My "understanding"?
No. I have understood all along that all four points of the definition do not have to apply for the word "procreation" to be used.
"Procreation" can simply be the carrying of a ***** to term.
YOU misunderstood and thought that procreation had to be all four parts of the definition YOU gave us.
Don't try to backpedal out of your gaffe.

However many there are in direct response to you dragging the conversations on.

Who is forcing you to think the way you do and make ANY response? Unlike that time you blamed ME for your actions that got you banned, take some personal responsibility.

I don't do that. You do.

OK. Cool. PROVE to us that Biden broke the law in using the SPR. PROVE that election was "stolen" from Trump. PROVE that bones do not have nerves in them. PROVE that a monoblock amp has multiple outputs. PROVE that Bide "sets" gas prices.
Pick just ONE of those challenges and do it.
I'll wait.

That doesn't have a damn thing to do with test tube babies or republicans forcing procreation. You're literally a turd a bro. Parthenogenesis is ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION YOU MORON. Don't confuse ****** reproduction and asexual reproduction. I'm referring to ****** activity and ****** reproduction, because the context we're talking about is HUMANS, NOT BUGS or lizards or some small organisms or plants. We aren't talking about invertebrates. We're talking about people that have spines, unlike you.

Then why did you bring it up?
It's not MY fault that you decided to jump in and help Spokey but didn't know what you were talking about.
Yes. ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION. It happens without "****** activity". So do test tube babies.

I don't see any riders in the definition of procreation that limit it only to humans. Do you?
Try tu inderstand what is being talked about before you chime in.
And take a moment to learn that "****** activity" does not mean "****** reproduction".

"****** reproduction involves the fusion of gametes from two parents, while asexual reproduction involves the creation of offspring without the involvement of gametes from another individual. Procreation, on the other hand, is a more specific term that refers to the act of producing offspring through ****** intercourse."

So intercourse must happen for procreation?
Then you are saying it is OK to abort a ***** that came to be via IVF since that is not procreation.
Knowing you are against abortion, do you want to walk back on that one a bit?

Reproduction vs Procreation: When To Use Each One In Writing

Reproduction and procreation are two terms that are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct meanings. So, what is the difference between

thecontentauthority.com

Procreation is almost always used in the context of ****** activity between humans, especially in a political thread, maggot. Nobody is forcing anybody to have ****** intercourse like you compared abortion to, you absolute dimwit.

Ahhhh, so it's "almost always used in the context of ****** activity" But then people like Spokey post very clear definitions that prove their argument wrong. And we should fall back on "almost always used in the context of ****** activity"

You can't have it both ways, kid. Do you want to be specific and precise or fall back on "That is correct, but not the way WE like it", kind of the way Thxone tried to weasel out of the bone innervation argument?
If you recall, HE decided that medical science uses the word "in" incorrectly when they say there are nerves IN bone. And they've been making the same error for more than a century.
He also decided that ****** orientation is based on the genitals one is born with. Yet had no explanation for what orientation people should have when born with BOTH sets of genitalia, or none at all (two situations that handily and instantly show his belief is wrong).

So, which is it? Should we argue based on facts, or based on beliefs?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

My "understanding"?
No. I have understood all along that all four points of the definition do not have to apply for the word "procreation" to be used.
"Procreation" can simply be the carrying of a ***** to term.
YOU misunderstood and thought that procreation had to be all four parts of the definition YOU gave us.
Don't try to backpedal out of your gaffe.


Who is forcing you to think the way you do and make ANY response? Unlike that time you blamed ME for your actions that got you banned, take some personal responsibility.

OK. Cool. PROVE to us that Biden broke the law in using the SPR. PROVE that election was "stolen" from Trump. PROVE that bones do not have nerves in them. PROVE that a monoblock amp has multiple outputs. PROVE that Bide "sets" gas prices.
Pick just ONE of those challenges and do it.
I'll wait.


Then why did you bring it up?
It's not MY fault that you decided to jump in and help Spokey but didn't know what you were talking about.
Yes. ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION. It happens without "****** activity". So do test tube babies.

I don't see any riders in the definition of procreation that limit it only to humans. Do you?
Try tu inderstand what is being talked about before you chime in.
And take a moment to learn that "****** activity" does not mean "****** reproduction".

So intercourse must happen for procreation?
Then you are saying it is OK to abort a ***** that came to be via IVF since that is not procreation.
Knowing you are against abortion, do you want to walk back on that one a bit?


Ahhhh, so it's "almost always used in the context of ****** activity" But then people like Spokey post very clear definitions that prove their argument wrong. And we should fall back on "almost always used in the context of ****** activity"

You can't have it both ways, kid. Do you want to be specific and precise or fall back on "That is correct, but not the way WE like it", kind of the way Thxone tried to weasel out of the bone innervation argument?
If you recall, HE decided that medical science uses the word "in" incorrectly when they say there are nerves IN bone. And they've been making the same error for more than a century.
He also decided that ****** orientation is based on the genitals one is born with. Yet had no explanation for what orientation people should have when born with BOTH sets of genitalia, or none at all (two situations that handily and instantly show his belief is wrong).

So, which is it? Should we argue based on facts, or based on beliefs?

Dude, all you're doing is bullshitting. You're literally arguing opposed to definitions and saying we are. You say we bring up irrelevant information but that's all you do to shift the context to be right about something that has nothing to do with any context anyone was saying. You have no dick. I bet your testicles look like raisins

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

YOU misunderstood and thought that procreation had to be all four parts of the definition YOU gave us.

Ouch...you almost got a burn in on me...but you still don't have a grip on procreation...so walk away before you look more "smart"

And prove Republicans are forcing procreation as you clearly stated

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Who is forcing you to think the way you do and make ANY response? Unlike that time you blamed ME for your actions that got you banned, take some personal responsibility.

Listen, you may have to be forced to do things, I do not. I do what I want when I want to do it.

OK. Cool. PROVE to us that Biden broke the law in using the SPR. PROVE that election was "stolen" from Trump. PROVE that bones do not have nerves in them. PROVE that a monoblock amp has multiple outputs. PROVE that Bide "sets" gas prices.
Pick just ONE of those challenges and do it.
I'll wait.

Prove to "us"? Who is "us" Rob? How long are you going to hold on to your hatred? Biden is on his way out. Republicans are on the way back in. It is about time too because we need the country to be great again.

TRUMP 2024!! MAGA!!

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Ouch...you almost got a burn in on me...but you still don't have a grip on procreation...so walk away before you look more "smart"

And prove Republicans are forcing procreation as you clearly stated

Already did. And I used the definition YOU provided to do so.
How about you prove that the definition for procreation you shared with us requires all FOUR points to be met, or it's not "procreation"?
Tell us why a test tube baby is not "procreation" since there was not ****** activity between the parents.
Tell us was asexual reproduction is not "procreation" since there is not even parentS, and certainly no ****** activity.
I'll wait.

Dude, all you're doing is bullshitting. You're literally arguing opposed to definitions and saying we are. You say we bring up irrelevant information but that's all you do to shift the context to be right about something that has nothing to do with any context anyone was saying. You have no dick. I bet your testicles look like raisins

Quite the argument you got there, kid. My testicles are fine. I'm not the one sitting in a bed in my own puddle of excrement, waiting for the federally-funded PCA to wipe me clean.

But let's get back tot he context that you decided to steer away from.
Do you want to argue facts, or beliefs?
The FACT is that the definition Spokey provided is exactly what it is. HE even said it was absolutely correct.3
And it shows that procreation is a word that can be used simply to describe carrying a ***** to term (or even not to term).

And then you decided that you don't like those facts and want to create your own context of words for the discussion.
You can't have both. So, do you want to argue facts, or argue beliefes? or. do you just want to sit there thinking you have insulted me, and pat yourself ont he back for your "victory"?

Listen, you may have to be forced to do things, I do not. I do what I want when I want to do it.

Prove to "us"? Who is "us" Rob? How long are you going to hold on to your hatred? Biden is on his way out. Republicans are on the way back in. It is about time too because we need the country to be great again.

TRUMP 2024!! MAGA!!

Then why did you blame ME for your actions when you got banned? That sure sounds like your were saying I controlled you and caused you to do something. Change your mind on that accusation, did you?

"Us" describes me and anyone else who may be reading the thread or your specific post.
But your tangent shows us you are unable to prove any of those things and will just continue to avoid admitting you fVcked up.
As usual.

Go ahead, Vote for the piece of sh8t trump. You're on a fixed income and have no worries about the economy, so you'll be fine.
Us folks who work for a living prefer a good economy over a sh*tty one.