Current events discussion

So you're saying your hospital doesn't do anything to protect patient privacy?
No such thing as a data breach since it's not locked down?

How do you compare data privacy laws with Trump committing financial fraud on a felony level?
No, I'm saying employees here are expected to act in accordance with the law.

The comparison is it's all pretense. Let's not pretend that (iirc) some labor union cares about privacy. People can be expected to act responsibly. When a doc needs my assistance figuring out why he can't order a surgery on his patient, I can be trusted to not be nosy and search thru the patient's whole medical chart. And when I can't resolve the issue and have to forward it to somebody else, we trust that person to unnecessarily go thru a patient's med chart. Just like if I sell you an amp tomorrow and you now have my personal info, I trust that you're not going to pull my tax records. They're pretending there is some threat to privacy that truly doesn't exist.
 
Buy high, sell low
1742855052113.jpeg
 
So he was just being a parade float?
No, but just because he wasn't a parade float, doesn't make him a murderer. Of course you could post a link to the story and we could see if there are facts that support that he attempted to murder people. The fact that the blurb you posted doesn't mention any injuries suggests that it may have been an action with ill intent.
 
Is it just me or does anybody else find it "curious" that Rob feels it's perfectly acceptable for him to have access to private information that he needs access to do his job of saving the taxpayer money, but when it's DOGE that needs access to a database with private information to save the taxpayer money, it's the end of the world??? Really funny how that works.

I'm afraid it is. Funny how the law works.
You see, I can access your tax records, but I can't just do it if I feel like it, without your consent.

Privacy laws are funny in that they protect privacy.
 
Is it just me or does anybody else find it "curious" that Rob feels it's perfectly acceptable for him to have access to private information that he needs access to do his job of saving the taxpayer money, but when it's DOGE that needs access to a database with private information to save the taxpayer money, it's the end of the world??? Really funny how that works.
DOGE hasn't been granted access to the info legally.
Rob has.
The people I investigate sign a contract whereupon they release accept that third parties can share information with me (not that it matters in the course of an investigation, but it makes the third parties more comfortable).

1742868155505.png



Does anyone else find it curious that you find law so entirely irrelevant when it comes to Trump and his boss Musk?
What is it about that crew that puts them above the law in your eyes?
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,963
Views
530,837
Last reply date
Last reply from
Jimi77
Curves.jpg

ThxOne

    May 25, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top