Current events discussion

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I guess you didn't realize that every time you post what you think, you are telling us what you think.
Not everyone's comprehension skills are as bad as your.

I wish you could understand what I am saying.

Only in at least six of my posts regarding how the COTUS protects all people on our soil. Posts that you were directly responding to, telling us all how you don't beleive the COTUS protects all people on our soil.

Yes, I know you said that over and over.

Were you responding to a different discussion about the COTUS protecting people, and posted here by mistake?
Did you forget when you used the words "our soil, our land" in your own post? It went something like this: View attachment 64070
As a claimed American living in North Carolina, do you know that "our soil, our land" would be the USA?

I know what I said. I said where did I say it in THAT post. Not any post.

View attachment 64069

I am. That's why I wanted to know why you were bringing it up as if it was a current law that said people on our soil are not protected by the COTUS.

Until you prove your beliefs, the facts say they are wrong.
Other than your "because I said so" mentality, you've offered nothing.

Your arguments are nothing but "because I said so". One more time Rob, who the **** said anyone has to PROVE anything to YOU????

Prove we have to prove anything to you.
Prove we have to prove anything to you.
Prove we have to prove anything to you.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The truth is that a Feb 15th White House memo says they must remove the clause from Federal Contracts.

"Clause 52.222-21 of the FAR is titled "Prohibition of Segregated Facilities" and reads: "The Contractor agrees that it does not and will not maintain or provide for its employees any segregated facilities at any of its establishments, and that it does not and will not permit its employees to perform their services at any location under its control where segregated facilities are maintained."

https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/03/18/nx-s1-5326118/segregation-federal-contracts-far-regulation-trump

"It defines segregated facilities as work areas, restaurants, drinking fountains, transportation, housing and more — and it says you can't segregate based on "race, color, religion, ***, ****** orientation, gender identity, or national origin."

By removing the clause, they are specifically eliminating the prohibition of segregation.
For what purpose?
And don't tell me "efficiency". Might as well say your gas mileage improved when you put helium in your tires.

It means no more of this delusional shit.

 

[administrator]

So great to see this thread continue ahead, with all the name calling and endless insults! Some things never change……

 

[administrator]

Alright guys, let’s give it another go. Please remember to follow the rules this time!

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I have been watching several different news channels in our absence from posting. Why isn't the left leaning media mentioning the fraud being found by DOGE? Serious question.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I have been watching several different news channels in our absence from posting. Why isn't the left leaning media mentioning the fraud being found by DOGE? Serious question.

Perhaps because it would be like reporting on the evidence that has been found, that Bigfoot exists.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Actual explanations.



Media opinions.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Actual explanations.



Media opinions.

No, those are receipts that the talking head in the video is calling "fraud", because that it what she has been told to call it. She simply rattled off numbers, and with a big smiling face said "He told us in layman's terms, and spoke common sense", while describing a complete lack of proof there has been fraud.

Fraud has many components, but simply disliking something or calling it fraud, does not make it fraud.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Hypocrite are no go

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No, those are receipts that the talking head in the video is calling "fraud", because that it what she has been told to call it. She simply rattled off numbers, and with a big smiling face said "He told us in layman's terms, and spoke common sense", while describing a complete lack of proof there has been fraud.

Fraud has many components, but simply disliking something or calling it fraud, does not make it fraud.

What you have there are receipts, a paper trail, proof of the amounts of money claimed to be paid out by the government. When it is investigated on the other end how much money was actually received by these entities the fraud will show its face. Bank on it. The government can claim they paid $1,000,000 for kids to learn how to tie shoes in Ixtapa because who is going to go there and find out for sure? Well now there is someone who will find out and the criminals in the government are freaking out over it.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What you have there are receipts, a paper trail, proof of the amounts of money claimed to be paid out by the government. When it is investigated on the other end how much money was actually received by these entities the fraud will show its face. Bank on it.

So you have the investigation completed and have the proof that the funds were never received by the entities that they were appropriated for? But DOGE does not.
How did you obtain the evidence, and can you share it here?

The government can claim they paid $1,000,000 for kids to learn how to tie shoes in Ixtapa because who is going to go there and find out for sure? Well now there is someone who will find out and the criminals in the government are freaking out over it.

As of March 7th, they were unable to present any proof of all the fraud they claim is happening, other than the "receipts" that Leavitt was all giddy about, as if she actually had a clue about any of it.

Talk is cheap. Where's the proof?
So far, the only fraud committed was Trump stealing money back from the state of New York. It was theft, and it was a violation of the COTUS and the Impoundments Act of 1974.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So you have the investigation completed and have the proof that the funds were never received by the entities that they were appropriated for? But DOGE does not.
How did you obtain the evidence, and can you share it here?

Yes. Clearly that is what my post stated.

As of March 7th, they were unable to present any proof of all the fraud they claim is happening, other than the "receipts" that Leavitt was all giddy about, as if she actually had a clue about any of it.

They know more than you dooooooooo.

Talk is cheap. Where's the proof?
So far, the only fraud committed was Trump stealing money back from the state of New York. It was theft, and it was a violation of the COTUS and the Impoundments Act of 1974.

Trump is the president. He is above the law.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

No Obama?

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Soros Comes for Schumer - Dem Leader Faces End of His Career as Soros-Backed Org Marks Him for Elimination

An organization backed by progressive billionaire George Soros called on Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to step down.

www.thegatewaypundit.com