You mean like when Trump changed his party affiliation five times and was thus anti-whatever-party-he-did-not-belong-to with each flip-flop?
Are you the only one who didn't notice that he said "almost all new amps have double outputs now", but then asked if he could ignore outputs?
Mono amps don't have double outputs, combined with his telling us he is out of the car audio loop, should cause anyone to question if he knows what he is talking about.
Kind of like the guy who comes on here saying his 12" driver "puts out 300 watts" and then asks what amp to buy,
Or the guy who thinks a system is powered by the alternator and not the battery.
But go ahead and try to cover for Thx and his confusion that mono amps are "bridged internally",
and that two wires touching or even twisted together are "bridged".
Thank you.
And this was covered already, but if you are so ill-informed that you don't know the difference between you and an expert, then you certainly shouldn't be arguing ANYHTING. You are not smart enough to know what you don't know. Go read the paper I linked to earlier.
Sorry sport, but you did. You told us that the ex-Jacksonville Jaguars team doctor said there are no nerves in bones. You forgot his name, though. Kinda like your girlfriend. "You wouldn't know her. She's from Canada". You get so deep in your lies, you simply can't recover.
View attachment 56746
View attachment 56747
More red herrings that have NOTHING to do with your claim that two wires touching each other are "bridged" and that mono amps are "bridged internally".
In your example, the copper piece is the "bridge". When it is removed and the wires touched to each other directly, they are "connected" not bridged.
I will bet that everyone here is rolling their eyes at your continuing failure to understand this simple concept, even if they hate me to the core.
Same for your "bones do not have nerves in them" claim, and all of your others.
I've proved you wrong on so many things, I've lost count. Your insistence that you are still right, in the face of incontrovertible proof that are wrong, changes nothing.
More red herrings that have NOTHING to do with your claim that two wires touching each other are "bridged" and that mono amps are "bridged internally".
In your example, the copper piece is the "bridge". When it is removed and the wires touched to each other directly, they are "connected" not bridged.
I will bet that everyone here is rolling their eyes at your continuing failure to understand this simple concept, even if they hate me to the core.
Same for your "bones do not have nerves in them" claim, and all of your others.
Electrons can flow from a wire into a piece of copper then into another wire, assuming they are all connected or at least touching each other. They flow from negative to positive.
In that circuit, the piece of copper is the bridge, and the wires are bridged. Remove the copper and to achieve electron flow, the wires would have to touch each other or another bridge would have to be put in place.
Two wires simply touching other will never be considered "bridged".
www.caraudio.com
