Current events discussion

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

How is Rob so good at finding old posts, but he can't remember he said reincarnation earlier...like what is this? Wtf is going on here? Is his memory really that bad, is he just lying and bending that hard to always be right, is it pure trolling, or do we have RobGPT? I'm scratching my head, but I also remember to never underestimate how stupid someone can be. Anyone know wtf is going on with Rob? There's just massive logic gaps missing.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Did you give an inaccurate answer on purpose, or were you just confused?
Making him think it's better to wire two subs to a single set of + and - terminals than to a distro block with one set of each. He could have fried an amp with that sh*t advice

How's is it inaccurate? You don't need to use both sets of terminals...or do you really not understand

And besides...where did I tell him to use only one?

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

OMG....Rob is an idiot WOW tell us more about monoblocks please!

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Joe is really keeping the world calm

War Expands With Massive Israeli Airstrikes 60km Deep Into Lebanon | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Pentagon Confirms $32M Drone Downed Off Yemen, Same Day UK Tanker Destroyed | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Yemen's Houthis say they attacked two US ships in Gulf of Aden

The group was pressed by Iran in October to join Hezbollah and Hamas in initiating attacks on Israel.

m.jpost.com

Houthis could attack Britain’s underwater internet cables

Houthi rebels could attack Britain’s underwater internet cables, a new report has warned.

www.yahoo.com

Russia Threatens Nukes For London, Washington if It Loses Ukraine War

Top Putin Ally warns West off a Ukrainian victory, warning that would lead to nuclear strikes on "Kiev, Berlin, London, Washington".

www.breitbart.com

Startling images of Chinese migrants seen flooding across US border

New images from the borer show the growing number of Chinese migrants arriving at the border.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Speed Chaser]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

How's is it inaccurate? You don't need to use both sets of terminals...or do you really not understand

And besides...where did I tell him to use only one?

Tell us how in your example it would be different to connect one 2 ohm sub to each set of terminals, or both 2 ohm subs to one set of terminals.

Because, you know, if you use both sets of terminals, it'll be different from using just one...SMH

Did you read anything? Why am I asking? It's clear that you didn't, typical leftist. You guys are so used to the media telling you what to think instead of thinking for yourself. But let me tell you what it says: "So, the jet fuel could (at the very most) have only added T - 25 = 282 - 25 = 257° C (495° F) to the temperature of the typical office fire that developed." I doubt you will understand, so let me break it down more. Nowhere in that article does it say that the maximum burning temperature for jet fuel is 495 degrees. It clearly states that is how much of an increase the structure of the building saw in temperature around the impact zone. Science says you can't read.

Yes. 495 over AMBIENT temperature. You familiar with ambient temp?
And the assumption that the fuel is the only contributing factor is damn foolish. Oxygen is a huge factor.
Ever used a wood stove? Airflow can change that smolder to a blast furnace in seconds.
Wood burns at 700 degrees, yet can melt steel with the right oxygen flow.

TBH, I'm simply just sick and f*****g tired of all of the conspiracy theory bullsh*t that people put out here.
Conspiracy bullsh*t is bad enough, but when they use false "facts" to try to prove their bullsh*t, it's REALLY annoying. Especially because gullible morons will believe ANYTHING that supports what they want to hear.

For f*ck sake, there are still idiots out there who believe a vaccine will make your body magnetic. But somehow that new magnetic property does NOTHING when run through an MRI. Should we talk about the yahoos claiming the vax is 98% deadly?
Facts can be a ***** when there's a narrative to push, huh?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

TBH, I'm simply just sick and f*****g tired of all of the conspiracy theory bullsh*t that people put out here.
Conspiracy bullsh*t is bad enough, but when they use false "facts" to try to prove their bullsh*t, it's REALLY annoying. Especially because gullible morons will believe ANYTHING that supports what they want to hear.

Uh oh, Houthis sank a ship:

Houthis reportedly sink British ship in Red Sea

Yemeni rebels attempting to impose a blockade on Israel fired rockets on a British ship and reportedly managed to sink it, the first time it has succeeded since the start of Israel's war on Hamas in Gaza

www.ynetnews.com

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Tell us how in your example it would be different to connect one 2 ohm sub to each set of terminals, or both 2 ohm subs to one set of terminals

Now you're spinning...I gave an example what using both terminals would do (that's essentially what he was asking)...

You're the one going for broke to look like a dumbass

Now back on topic...why were YOU the only one in that thread not able to understand the question asked?

 

[Speed Chaser]

Tell us how in your example it would be different to connect one 2 ohm sub to each set of terminals, or both 2 ohm subs to one set of terminals.View attachment 56791
Because, you know, if you use both sets of terminals, it'll be different from using just one...SMH





Yes. 495 over AMBIENT temperature. You familiar with ambient temp?
And the assumption that the fuel is the only contributing factor is damn foolish. Oxygen is a huge factor.
Ever used a wood stove? Airflow can change that smolder to a blast furnace in seconds.
Wood burns at 700 degrees, yet can melt steel with the right oxygen flow.

TBH, I'm simply just sick and f*****g tired of all of the conspiracy theory bullsh*t that people put out here.
Conspiracy bullsh*t is bad enough, but when they use false "facts" to try to prove their bullsh*t, it's REALLY annoying. Especially because gullible morons will believe ANYTHING that supports what they want to hear.

For f*ck sake, there are still idiots out there who believe a vaccine will make your body magnetic. But somehow that new magnetic property does NOTHING when run through an MRI.
Facts can be a ***** when there's a narrative to push, huh?

Rob's tactic is to accuse the other person of not understanding what he himself doesn't comprehend—talk about childish. I also see you are back to capitalizing useless crap, as if that's going to make your point more valid. You're dismissive of anything that disproves the BS you spout. At this point, it's embarrassing how unintelligent you come off. Really, oxygen is a HUGE factor? Is that why, in the paper, the author states, '"Since we do not know the exact quantities of oxygen available to the fire, we will assume that the combustion was perfectly efficient, that is, that the entire quantity of jet fuel burnt via reaction (1), even though we know that this was not so. This generous assumption will give a temperature that we know will be higher than the actual temperature of the fire attributable to the jet fuel." So adding more oxygen won't do anything since he's already assuming a perfect stoichiometric ratio in his calculation. But sure, keep pushing the mainstream garbage.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So wait, is Rob saying that "a kerosene-based product having a maximum distillation temperature of 400 degrees Fahrenheit at the 10-percent recovery point and a final maximum boiling point of 572 degrees Fahrenheit and meeting ASTM Specification D 1655 and Military Specifications MIL-T-5624P and MIL-T-83133D (Grades JP-5 and JP-8). It is used for commercial and military turbojet and turboprop aircraft engines" melted the steel in the WTC but somehow doesn't melt the metals in a jet engine??

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

So wait, is Rob saying that "a kerosene-based product having a maximum distillation temperature of 400 degrees Fahrenheit at the 10-percent recovery point and a final maximum boiling point of 572 degrees Fahrenheit and meeting ASTM Specification D 1655 and Military Specifications MIL-T-5624P and MIL-T-83133D (Grades JP-5 and JP-8). It is used for commercial and military turbojet and turboprop aircraft engines" melted the steel in the WTC but somehow doesn't melt the metals in a jet engine??

He's confused by a second set of terminals on a monoblock...what do you expect

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

TBH, I'm simply just sick and f*****g tired of all of the conspiracy theory bullsh*t that people put out here.
Conspiracy bullsh*t is bad enough, but when they use false "facts" to try to prove their bullsh*t, it's REALLY annoying. Especially because gullible morons will believe ANYTHING that supports what they want to hear

....nobody is forcing you to be here, or are they? what a fucking snowflake crybaby you are!! Hilarious, boohoo Rob is mad because he has no power to "police" the forum and has destroyed his own credibilty

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

How's is it inaccurate? You don't need to use both sets of terminals...or do you really not understand

And besides...where did I tell him to use only one?

Tell us how in your example it would be different to connect one 2 ohm sub to each set of terminals, or both 2 ohm subs to one set of terminals.View attachment 56791
Because, you know, if you use both sets of terminals, it'll be different from using just one...SMH

Did you read anything? Why am I asking? It's clear that you didn't, typical leftist. You guys are so used to the media telling you what to think instead of thinking for yourself. But let me tell you what it says: "So, the jet fuel could (at the very most) have only added T - 25 = 282 - 25 = 257° C (495° F) to the temperature of the typical office fire that developed." I doubt you will understand, so let me break it down more. Nowhere in that article does it say that the maximum burning temperature for jet fuel is 495 degrees. It clearly states that is how much of an increase the structure of the building saw in temperature around the impact zone. Science says you can't read.

Yes. 495 over AMBIENT temperature. You familiar with ambient temp?
And the assumption that the fuel is the only contributing factor is damn foolish. Oxygen is a huge factor.
Ever used a wood stove? Airflow can change that smolder to a blast furnace in seconds.
Wood burns at 700 degrees, yet can melt steel with the right oxygen flow.
TBH, I'm simply just sick and f*****g tired of all of the conspiracy theory bullsh*t that people put out here.

Rob's tactic is to accuse the other person of not understanding what he himself doesn't comprehend—talk about childish. I also see you are back to capitalizing useless crap, as if that's going to make your point more valid. You're dismissive of anything that disproves the BS you spout. At this point, it's embarrassing how unintelligent you come off. Really, oxygen is a HUGE factor? Is that why, in the paper, the author states, '"Since we do not know the exact quantities of oxygen available to the fire, we will assume that the combustion was perfectly efficient, that is, that the entire quantity of jet fuel burnt via reaction (1), even though we know that this was not so. This generous assumption will give a temperature that we know will be higher than the actual temperature of the fire attributable to the jet fuel." So adding more oxygen won't do anything since he's already assuming a perfect stoichiometric ratio in his calculation. But sure, keep pushing the mainstream garbage.

I'm dismissive of bulksh*t.
Yeah, oxygen is a HUGE factor in combustion. Ever take a science class?
When a fire gets regular AIR it burns hotter.
When a fire gets AIR provided at velocity, it can get hot enough to melt metal.
Shocked? It's a principle that's 5,000 years old.
Here's a video.
Mainstream garbage? Tell me the video is faked, and how.

So wait, is Rob saying that "a kerosene-based product having a maximum distillation temperature of 400 degrees Fahrenheit at the 10-percent recovery point and a final maximum boiling point of 572 degrees Fahrenheit and meeting ASTM Specification D 1655 and Military Specifications MIL-T-5624P and MIL-T-83133D (Grades JP-5 and JP-8). It is used for commercial and military turbojet and turboprop aircraft engines" melted the steel in the WTC but somehow doesn't melt the metals in a jet engine??

Are you genuinely questioning whether or not combusting jet fuel can melt metal? Jet fuel has an open air burn temp of just under 2,000F and can burn at upwards of 4,000F.
Steel can melt anywhere from 2,500F and up.
Math confuses you, so I'll explain that it only takes a little bit of air movement to make that jet fuel burn a lot hotter than its open-air burn temp.

Wood burns open-air at 700F and can be used to melt steel with some airflow. Jet fuel burns at ~2,000F open air. Guess what it can do with some airflow? MELT STEEL.
Where is your confusion?

He's confused by a second set of terminals on a monoblock...what do you expect

Mmm hmmm, says the guy who thinks using the second set of terminals will change the impedance presented by the connected subwoofers.
Do those second set of terminals run in a a different version of "parallel" to the mono amp?

"If you use both say a 2ohm load into each output...the amp will see a 1ohm load"
So this is a different 1ohm load than if he runs both subs into just a single set of + and - terminals.
What is different about it from the 1ohm load if he ran two 2ohm subs to a single set of terminals?
Is it a "double output" 1 ohm load? Are those harder for the amp to drive?
Wow.

....nobody is forcing you to be here, or are they? what a fucking snowflake crybaby you are!! Hilarious, boohoo Rob is mad because he has no power to "police" the forum and has destroyed his own credibilty

No one is begging or forcing you to be here either. Or ARE they?
How much do you get paid to post all those f*cking dumbass memes?
You're a sheep who can't even think independently without a meme to tell you what to do. Funny that you mention credibility

For a guy who spends so much time telling us he doesn't care, you just can't seem to stay away huh?
Put your money where you virtual mouth. Care so little, that you don't participate here any more.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Tell us how in your example it would be different to connect one 2 ohm sub to each set of terminals, or both 2 ohm subs to one set of terminals.View attachment 56791
Because, you know, if you use both sets of terminals, it'll be different from using just one...SMH





Yes. 495 over AMBIENT temperature. You familiar with ambient temp?
And the assumption that the fuel is the only contributing factor is damn foolish. Oxygen is a huge factor.
Ever used a wood stove? Airflow can change that smolder to a blast furnace in seconds.
Wood burns at 700 degrees, yet can melt steel with the right oxygen flow.
TBH, I'm simply just sick and f*****g tired of all of the conspiracy theory bullsh*t that people put out here.

I'm dismissive of bulksh*t.
Yeah, oxygen is a HUGE factor in combustion. Ever take a science class?
When a fire gets regular AIR it burns hotter.
When a fire gets AIR provided at velocity, it can get hot enough to melt metal.
Shocked? It's a principle that's 5,000 years old.
Here's a video.
Mainstream garbage? Tell me the video is faked, and how.


Are you genuinely questioning whether or not combusting jet fuel can melt metal? Jet fuel has an open air burn temp of just under 2,000F and can burn at upwards of 4,000F.
Steel can melt anywhere from 2,500F and up.
Math confuses you, so I'll explain that it only takes a little bit of air movement to make that jet fuel burn a lot hotter than its open-air burn temp.

Wood burns open-air at 700F and can be used to melt steel with some airflow. Jet fuel burns at ~2,000F open air. Guess what it can do with some airflow? MELT STEEL.
Where is your confusion?

Mmm hmmm, says the guy who thinks using the second set of terminals will change the impedance presented by the connected subwoofers.
Do those second set of terminals run in a a different version of "parallel" to the mono amp?
View attachment 56797

"If you use both say a 2ohm load into each output...the amp will see a 1ohm load"
So this is a different 1ohm load than if he runs both subs into just a single set of + and - terminals.
What is different about it from the 1ohm load if he ran two 2ohm subs to a single set of terminals?
Is it a "double output" 1 ohm load? Are those harder for the amp to drive?
Wow.

No one is begging or forcing you to be here either. Or ARE they?
How much do you get paid to post all those f*cking dumbass memes?
You're a sheep who can't even think independently without a meme to tell you what to do. Funny that you mention credibility

For a guy who spends so much time telling us he doesn't care, you just can't seem to stay away huh?
Put your money where you virtual mouth. Care so little, that you don't participate here any more.

Your personality disorder is showing

"Ideally, people's personality traits allow them to flexibly adapt to their changing environment in ways that lead to more healthy relationships with others and better coping strategies. When people have personality traits that are less adaptive, this leads to inflexibility and unhealthy coping. For example, they may manage stress by drinking or misusing drugs, have a hard time managing their anger, and find it hard to trust and connect with others."

Personality disorders - Symptoms and causes

www.mayoclinic.org

Rob's an unhealthy coper

I am not a biologist