Current events discussion

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"The former president made hay of that distinction when he sued Carroll in June, alleging Carroll defamed him by saying she was ***** in a media interview after the verdict.
The counterattack was quickly shot down.
Federal Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled in August that the jury verdict showed Carroll's **** allegation was "substantially true" and dismissed the counterclaim."

In the decision, Judge Kaplan said this:
"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “*****” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “*****” her as many people commonly understand the word “****.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."
Since you will likely say I made it up, or it's "fake news" or "alternative definitions" or some other bullshit, you can read the decision yourself: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html

Like I said, you elected a ******. And a self-admitted ****** predator. A convicted felon. A racist.
Congrats.

Carroll lied. She got paid for lying. She is a liar. In a high end department store in 1995 or 1996, she couldn't "remember", but somehow was diddled by Trump. Apparently all the security cameras were off too. One on one if a woman does not want to have ***, 9 times out of 10 she isn't having ***.

Allegedly, pulled down her tights and had his way with her. I am throwing the bullshit flag. Did she fight?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Carroll lied. She got paid for lying. She is a liar. In a high end department store in 1995 or 1996, she couldn't "remember", but somehow was diddled by Trump. Apparently all the security cameras were off too. One on one if a woman does not want to have ***, 9 times out of 10 she isn't having ***.

Allegedly, pulled down her tights and had his way with her. I am throwing the bullshit flag. Did she fight?

She did say that she said most people think **** is sexy, does that count as fighting back?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Nope. Cooking day.

My brother used to say he "cooked dinner" when in actuality he turned on the oven and heated a frozen lasagna.

So, Rob... you going to admit to my accusation of you made earlier?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

She did say that she said most people think **** is sexy, does that count as fighting back?

I know. Funny how it is sexy until you are broke and need money then suddenly you were diddled against your will.

 

[Speed Chaser]

It doesn't matter what you think can happen, because you have no proof that it can. You have zero proof right now that AI can survive without humanity.

Prove that AI can create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans. That is an assumption until you prove it.

It’s hilarious how you keep repeating the same thing like it somehow proves your point. It’s not what I think, moron, it’s a clear and logical conclusion. You wanna know what doesn’t matter? The bullshit you constantly pull out of your *** about 'elites'—without any proof to back it up.

Once again, show me where I said 'right now AI can survive without humanity.' You can’t, because I never said it. Yet here you are, crying like a little ***** about me supposedly putting words in your mouth—talk about being a hypocrite.

Now, prove that AI can’t eventually create optimized biological systems that don’t need human upkeep. That’s your assumption, not mine, and until you prove it, your argument falls apart.

Cry more to your elite, moron.

So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans? You can’t answer, can you? HA.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Carroll lied. She got paid for lying. She is a liar. In a high end department store in 1995 or 1996, she couldn't "remember", but somehow was diddled by Trump. Apparently all the security cameras were off too. One on one if a woman does not want to have ***, 9 times out of 10 she isn't having ***.

Allegedly, pulled down her tights and had his way with her. I am throwing the bullshit flag. Did she fight?

Ahhhh, so Spokey asks for proof, and I give him the words from the court decision.
And your defense against that proof is "she lied".

With your amazing legal defense skills, why didn't you represent him in court?
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury: She lied. The defense rests"
Think of the millions you could have saved him on his defense and on the damages he has to pay.

OK, I showed my proof. Nopw show YOUR proof of the "she lied" defense.
Claiming women lie about **** isn't a proof.
Saying that 9 out of 10 times a woman says no, she isn't having *** means 10% of the women who say no get *****. TEN PERCENT.

So go ahead and show me YOUR proof for your defense.
It might help Spokey out of the hole he dug, when he assumed there was no legal standing to say he elected a ******.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Ahhhh, so Spokey asks for proof, and I give him the words from the court decision.
And your defense against that proof is "she lied".

With your amazing legal defense skills, why didn't you represent him in court?
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury: She lied. The defense rests"
Think of the millions you could have saved him on his defense and on the damages he has to pay.

OK, I showed my proof. Nopw show YOUR proof of the "she lied" defense.
Claiming women lie about **** isn't a proof.
Saying that 9 out of 10 times a woman says no, she isn't having *** means 10% of the women who say no get *****. TEN PERCENT.

So go ahead and show me YOUR proof for your defense.
It might help Spokey out of the hole he dug, when he assumed there was no legal standing to say he elected a ******.

Did she fight him?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

It’s hilarious how you keep repeating the same thing like it somehow proves your point. It’s not what I think, moron, it’s a clear and logical conclusion. You wanna know what doesn’t matter? The bullshit you constantly pull out of your *** about 'elites'—without any proof to back it up.

Once again, show me where I said 'right now AI can survive without humanity.' You can’t, because I never said it. Yet here you are, crying like a little ***** about me supposedly putting words in your mouth—talk about being a hypocrite.

Now, prove that AI can’t eventually create optimized biological systems that don’t need human upkeep. That’s your assumption, not mine, and until you prove it, your argument falls apart.

Cry more to your elite moron.

So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans? You can’t answer, can you? HA.

They aren't my elite, that's just the general name for them, the elite, the globalists, the evil billionaires, the technocrats, whatever, it's a colloquial word. I'm talking about the big money that makes the world turn. Those people are the ones developing all the shit. I don't follow them like I worship them, I follow them like they are my enemy.

"So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?"

So once again, you have zero proof that can happen. If it's a clear and logical conclusion, then you should clearly and logically be able to prove it- yet, just like a vanishing act, there's no proof.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Come on Rob, did she fight Trump?

I also said that one on one if a woman does not want to have ***, 9 times out of 10 she isn't having ***. I didn't say "9 out of 10 times a woman says no, she isn't having *** means 10% of the women who say no get *****" - RobGMN.

See you are proving my accusation made earlier. You will change words around, misquote people or leave off words to make it look like people say things they didn't say.

 

[Speed Chaser]

They aren't my elite, that's just the general name for them, the elite, the globalists, the evil billionaires, the technocrats, whatever, it's a colloquial word. I'm talking about the big money that makes the world turn. Those people are the ones developing all the shit. I don't follow them like I worship them, I follow them like they are my enemy.

"So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?"

So once again, you have zero proof that can happen. If it's a clear and logical conclusion, then you should clearly and logically be able to prove it- yet, just like a vanishing act, there's no proof.

Coming from the moron who can't answer the question without breaking his worldview

Pathetic. Yeah, you don't worship them so much that they are constantly in your head.

So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?

Come on, your elite awaits the next excuse you'll use to avoid answering.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Coming from the moron who can't answer the question without breaking his worldview

Pathetic. Yeah, you don't worship them so much that they are constantly in your head.

So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?

I don't worship them, I follow them like they are my enemy, I watch their moves to see what evil they are planning. All you are doing at this point is shit talking, like you have a goddamn clue what goes on in my head.

I can't answer a hypothetical question like it's a real answer, because it hasn't happened, and you've provided zero proof that it can happen. You're literally just saying that thing can happen and then expecting me to respond like it's going to happen without you giving any proof it's going to happen. It doesn't break my worldview because there's nothing you presented that proves it.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Do any of you guys play with RC cars? That is what me and Old_Slapper play with

I got my son a Traxxas Rustler because all the cheap big box ones I got him in the past died a day after the warranty. He plays with his "real RC car" about once a year. $400 well spent.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Did she fight him?

You should have asked when you represented him in court.
Let's try again: Show me your proof that this court decision is incorrect:

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “*****” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “*****” her as many people commonly understand the word “****.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."

 

[Speed Chaser]

I can't answer a hypothetical question like it's a real answer, because it hasn't happened, and you've provided zero proof that it can happen. You're literally just saying that thing can happen and then expecting me to respond like it's going to happen without you giving any proof it's going to happen. It doesn't break my worldview because there's nothing you presented that proves it.

Nice try, but you're still avoiding the point. A hypothetical question isn't about whether it's already happened—it's about logical potential. You're acting like it’s impossible just because it hasn’t occurred yet.

Funny how you can easily talk about hypothetical elites taking over without proof, but when it comes to a hypothetical about your worldview, suddenly that's too much. Next-level hypocrite.

The fact that AI is already optimizing biological systems, like in gene editing and protein production in the digital space, shows that it can eventually outgrow humanity. Just because you can’t wrap your head around it doesn’t mean the evidence isn’t there.
And once again, the burden of proof is on you. I’m presenting a logical argument based on current advancements, while you’re stuck in denial. If you’re so sure AI will always need humans, show me why. Otherwise, just admit you're wrong.

So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?

Come on, your elite awaits the next excuse you'll use to avoid answering.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

You should have asked when you represented him in court.
Let's try again: Show me your proof that this court decision is incorrect:

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “*****” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “*****” her as many people commonly understand the word “****.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."

Trump was found guilty of ****** abuse.