Current events discussion

"The telecommunications companies that were breached have responded, but none of them “have fully removed the Chinese actors from these networks,” according to Neuberger.

“So there is a risk of ongoing compromises to communications until U.S. companies address the cybersecurity gaps the Chinese are likely to maintain their access,” Neuberger said."

"CISA Executive Assistant Director for Cybersecurity Jeff Greene conceded on Tuesday that he didn’t have a timeline on when Chinese hackers could be purged from U.S. telecom networks.

"It would be impossible for us to predict when we'll have full eviction,” Greene said at the time."


Repost but wtf is going on?

"Now even the FBI and CISA, the US cyber defense agency, are warning Americans to use responsibly encrypted messaging and phone calls where they can. The backdrop is the Chinese hacking of US networks that is reportedly “ongoing and likely larger in scale than previously understood.”"


Are we completely compromised by China with our communications? Seriously?
 
Last edited:

Registered? So your argument for more than the other is down to being registered. There could be 50,000,000 unregistered Republicans. Future voters who have not picked their path. Sure they could be future Democrats but once all these Dems are exposed I can see a surge of Republican future voters.

Who would this person be?
Yes, REGISTERED. Tell me, what is YOUR dataset for determining the quantity of voters per party other than those who are registered to a party?
Do you call everyone of voting age in the country and ask them their political leanings? Do you personally decide what the numbers COULD be, and consider that to be the actual number? Do you take a poll at work and consider that to be the "true" dataset? Do you poll every farmer, and then decide the majority of the country is republican?

Other than the number of people registered to a party, how do YOU determine the number of Democrats vs. the number of Republicans?

That person would be Trump, since he fits the description, and he is the "best" the party could come up with.
If this is true, then you need to step back and ask why Trump won. Is it due to those millions of other democrats realize that Kamala too crooked so they voted for Trump? Why did more dems jump ship and join the republicans during the Biden and Kamala years?
I attribute it to a false sense of security and complacency. The studies are also saying a whole bunch of people in a specific group didn't vote, but I haven't seen that verified yet.

Again with the false accusations. ******? Show me the proof. Pathological liar? Biden has a lot more blatant lies flying around to try and get votes. Racist? Pre presidential runs, he's been seen with a lot more ethnics than Biden, who has made more racist comments than Trump. Then again, you already know all of this, so you're just going to throw a "Squirl" out there to divert the attention on what I just said..

I'm afraid it was decided in court. So it's not a "false accusation". You know that whole "innocent until proved guilty" thing? Yeah. It was proved.
30,000 DOCUMENTED lies during his 4-year term. That's pathological, as in "extreme in a way that is not normal or that shows an illness or mental problem."
Compile a list of 1/100 of that amount of lies for Biden, and share it here. Then, we can compare notes.
Racist: Yeah, he had to settle a suit for denying people the ability to rent properties based on the color of their skin. Housing discrimination. He was also fined $200,000 by the NJ Casino Commission for not allowing black employees on the casino floor while he was there.
The epitome of racism.

Did you not know ANY of these things about Trump?
Look them up and learn.
Show me the "squirrel" in the FACTS above.
What? The dems are trying to meddle even more in our lives? SHOCKING!!!!
You mean like the Repubs telling a woman what she can or cannot do with her own body?
Or telling people that their non-Catholic children must read the Bible to be indoctrinated in public school?
Yeah, no "meddling" there. Just good Catholic values, right? 🙄
Was Rob trying to deny that people have flatlined and been brought back?
No. I was denying that Buck DIED and came back to life. Flatlining is not dying. Flatlining means your heart stops. It happens all the time, by illness, by accident, by medical intent, and they get restarted. It's literally commonplace to the point of most large spaces (office buildings, stores, malls) having an AED on each floor for the inevitable heart attack victim, and they do it in surgeries every day.

"Dead" means your brain has ceased all electrical activity. There is no coming back from that one. Buck stated he died and was brought back to life, I believe following some interstellar trip he took (though I may be conflating some of his many fantasies).
I called bullshit on the "rising from the dead" story.
 
Last edited:
This is where I think having it at a state level is best. Each of the extremes can have it their way. This is where they need present the law they wish their state to have, and vote on it. States already for people into lifestyles that some love and some hate. If you don't like it, you can move. On a federal level, it's not so easy to escape it. Some people just flat out get sick thinking of someone having an abortion, and some people barely care if the baby is aborted even after birth. The only even ground there is, is to let the states decide.
There should not be a Federal or state-level law regarding what a woman should or should not do with her body.
Enact a law that says a man cannot do what he wants with his own body.
Hell, outlaw Viagra. Grab some popcorn and watch the war.
 
Yes, REGISTERED. Tell me, what is YOUR dataset for determining the quantity of voters per party other than those who are registered to a party?
Party identification on voter registration doesn't really mean anything since it doesn't prevent someone from voting however they like...
 
Here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?tid=ptv_rellink
You can sort by all different criteria, you can see charts and graphs, you can download a csv of them all.
They're even polite enough to let you know when and where he said it, so you can go and verify yourself thjat he said it.
Probably even see it "live" on YouTube.
VERY detailed accounting of his dishonest nature, and hard to call bullshit like Thx does, when you can check them.
Every. Single. One.
1733446320893.png

1733446349044.png


Party identification on voter registration doesn't really mean anything since it doesn't prevent someone from voting however they like...
OK, so how do YOU determine the number of registered Democrats vs the number of Registered Republicans?
 

Attachments

  • 1733446274373.png
    1733446274373.png
    31.8 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
Here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?tid=ptv_rellink
You can sort by all different criteria, you can see charts and graphs, you can download a csv of them all.
They're even polite enough to let you know when and where he said it, so you can go and verify yourself thjat he said it.
Probably even see it "live" on YouTube.
VERY detailed accounting of his dishonest nature, and hard to call bullshit like Thx does, when you can check them.
Every. Single. One.
View attachment 61713
View attachment 61714
You made the claim and by your own repeated standard...it's on you to provide the proof not on me to dig around to back your claims...
 
OK, so how do YOU determine the number of registered Democrats vs the number of Registered Republicans?
Only a partisan hack cares about those numbers...because they mean nothing...party identification doesn't limit voter choice and there's no way to factually prove how a person voted outside their say so 😂
 
You made the claim and by your own repeated standard...it's on you to provide the proof not on me to dig around to back your claims...
After you share a link to "townhall.com" to show 300 lies that Biden made? Ironic. Hypocrite much?

Already provided one of Trump's. Disprove it, and we'll chip away at the rest.

And the Post isn't exactly unbiased rated highly for the truth
Instead of being an *** about it, why not just disprove that Trump said the lies they catlaogued?
Start with the first one I shared, and then go from there.
Only a partisan hack cares about those numbers...because they mean nothing...party identification doesn't limit voter choice and there's no way to factually prove how a person voted outside their say so 😂
In other words, spin away from your dumbass idea that the number of people registered to a party has nothing to do with the number of supporters a given party has.

So, WHAT IS THE CRITERIA YOU USE TO DETERMINE HOW MANY SUPPORTERS A PARTY HAS?
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,719
Views
447,322
Last reply date
Last reply from
RobGMN
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top