You haven't provided any substantial evidence; I've demonstrated multiple times how your single chart is inconclusive. It's quite convenient for you that it only covers data up to 2019. Perhaps TDS has clouded your understanding of numbers. If I present a chart that refutes your baseless claim that the border crisis started with Trump and you ignore it the same argument can be made against the chart you show. The only difference is that my chart offers a more in-depth analysis, highlighting the inaccuracies in your position.So you don't want to speak to the incongruities of your claims versus reality, proof be damned.
Got it.
Biden definitely dumb. A graduate of the University of Delaware, and Syracuse Law school, a practicing attorney, one of the youngest people ever elected to Senate, managed to keep getting elected to remain in senate for 36 years, became Vice President, became President. Definitely a dummy.
Still avoiding admitting that you made a false claim about your own actions and then got proved wrong yet again.
And you wonder why this stuff goes in circles.
I have VERY clearly asked you to prove your claims with something more than "because I said so".
If "because I said so" is a valid backing for an argument, we should all just say our piece once, and then close the thread, as any further debate is pointless.
I am more than willing to back up what I say with the data. And I have done so.
So I'll ask again: Show us your analysis that the decline in 2020 was not due to COVID. Show us the datasets you used and the method of making your calculations and determinations. They should have at least 7 different data points, like the professional research centers use.
Further, explain how the explosive influx under Trump is NOT an indication that the crisis started during hsi administration, but that a smaller rate of growth under Biden IS proof that the crisis is his fault.
Tell us more about how the "left" has the NFAC do their dirty work.
is it anything like how the right has domestic terrorists like Timothy McVeigh do THEIR dirty work?
Tell us more about how the left is worse than the right as far as violence.
I'm sure your analysis will differ 100%, but here is something of interest:
"However, although there was a historically high level of both far-right and far-left terrorist attacks in 2021, violent far-right incidents were significantly more likely to be lethal, both in terms of weapon choice and number of resulting fatalities"
Pushed to Extremes: Domestic Terrorism amid Polarization and Protest
The number of domestic terrorist attacks and plots at demonstrations has increased, resulting in escalating violence in U.S. cities between extremists from opposing sides. This analysis updates a CSIS data set to assess trends in domestic terrorism through December 2021.www.csis.org
I've asked you several times for your proof, but all you've presented is data from one year, along with claims that everyone's analysis agrees with you—yet no concrete evidence. It's ironic how you keep imposing additional requirements for proof while failing to provide adequate support for your own arguments.
Regarding Timothy, who only linked to Republicans was that he voted for them while in New York but was motivated by anti-government ideology, it's a weak attempt on your part, but it doesn't hold up. Furthermore, you conveniently
overlooked the link demonstrating left-wing violence targeting federal buildings. I expected nothing less, as it's typical for individuals like you to ignore anything that reflects poorly on your side.
According to your own source, "Violent far-left terrorists are motivated by opposition to capitalism, imperialism, or colonialism; Black nationalism; support for environmental causes or animal rights; pro-communist or pro-socialist beliefs; or support for decentralized political and social systems, such as anarchism." Interestingly, some of these talking points align with those of some Democrats.
Your perspective seems to perpetuate a two-tier system with a double standard for defining and acknowledging violence committed by the left. As Dan Bishop aptly put it, "After all, you cannot address a threat you decline to define or acknowledge." Additionally, I specifically mentioned 'violence,' not just instances leading to murder, as you seem to be leaning towards.
Last edited:
TDS
