So, you are talking about the MAGA people who are wacked out? You think they actually speak for the majority of the MAGA people? That's like me saying "You believe it's okay to march ***** in front of children" because there are liberals marching around ***** in front of children.
Which is precisely what right-wingers do.
Are you new?
Show me a credible source that states guns don't go off on their own. You are probably taking a quote from a small group that is not considered as a credible source. Again, you can't take on person's word and project it onto a vast group of people.
"A credible source that says guns don't go off on their own"? That's trying to prove a negative.
A man as highly educated as yourself should know better.
Haw about you show me a proof of a gun that spontaneously fired in the complete absence of human intervention, or a physical change of state, such as falling from a height, etc.
If you talk to any credible pro-gun person, they will tell you that this guy is an idiot. He's drunk while handling a loaded gun. You should really take some time to find out what people really think about this matter, rather than finding some stupid statement to spark your selfish and ignorant argument.
And yet you tried to defend him by saying his daughter voluntarily went to look at his new gun, at that Glocks are known to just fire on their own.
Almost every gun? Hmmm. I call BS on that, unless you can show facts on that. I'm guessing you're the one who is not very educated with guns.
Any mechanical gun (i.e ALL of them, can be fired unintentionally. It's the nature of the beast.
But to support your argument, show me a gun that has NO possibility of being fired accidentally.
A gun that is 100% fail-safe.
Mfgr and model, please.
Not once did I defend him from being stupid. You talk as though he purposely killed her.
See above.
I thought you only go by what the courts say. Are you saying there are flawed court prosecutions?
At this point, I don't even know WTF you are talking about.
There may be flawed court DECISIONS, but unless they get changed in some way, the flaws are irrelevant.
Do you think the mere existence of a flaw in a court decision simply changes the decision?
Again, the court said it was an accidental discharge. Are you going against the courts? Are you saying the courts can be bias against certain political parties?
So an accidental discharge means he didn't kill his daughter? Or that the court simply declined to prosecute for negligent homicide, in disregard of the fact that he was drunk & handling a gun, the fact that he pointed the gun at his daughter while drunk, and the fact that he pulled the trigger while drunk, handling a gun, AND pointing it at his daughter?
If someone did the same but it was to a family member of yours, maybe your kid, would you celebrate the lack of prosecution, and defend the person by saying the gun they had is known to "go off", when the actual occurrence of such is 4/10,000%
Gee, if that is true, I wonder if the courts were swayed in the Trump hearings.
The jury was picked by Trump's attorneys. Are you suggesting his attorneys were in on the conspiracy to nail him, or that EVERY possible person that could have been picked for the jury was anti-Trump?
The attorney option seems unlikely.
So that leaves a 100% chance that ANY jury pool would convict. Which in turn means that EVERYONE is against Trump. And if EVERYONE is against Trump, then he needs to go.
So which option do think it is?
More like you being part of the same people who will only agree to court hearings when they support their argument. We all know how convenient you find that.
Whether I agree or not is irrelevant. The decision is law.
What's with you right-wingers, thinking that your opinions, beliefs, feelings, somehow change the facts and reality>
Sorry, you can opine all you want that the court decisions against Trump are invalid. That will NEVER change those decisions.
And if that confuses you, interpret it (as the right-wingers love to say) "F*ck your feelings", because they are 100% irrelevant in the face of facts they my contradict.