Why, because I have opinions that you don't agree with?
Because YOU brought up "common sense" and then refuse to apply it to the situation.
That's a statement, not an example.
When the status quo is never the simplest solution. When there are clearly other answers. When something is overly simplified then it was made to look that way. Haven't you ever heard the phrases "That was too easy" "Nothing is ever that easy" "Too neat" "Too perfect"?
The simplest solution is not the most likely one when there is a status quo? That makes no sense at all.
Those phrases have no relevance to the natural order of things, nor Occam's Razor.
They describe situations where there are hidden, underlying factors that are unknown. If there are hidden, underlying factors, then the simplest solution was not met.
So she flipped on Trump right? Does that suddenly mean all the lefties who hated her, love her? How about if Trump decides he is Democrat again... Ya'll gonna embrace him and vote for him? If that is the case ALL of you left leaning liberals are bat shit ******* crazy and need to be under surveillance.
Why would you claim it was a Democrat threatening her, then claim that all Democrats love her because she flipped? Makes no sense, and it's a really weird assumption.
Only to a narrow minded fool.
Couldn't hold off on the name-calling for even a few days, huh? Good work.
When you contradict your own argument, it's self-defeating.
Jesus Christ. Stop making ******* claims you are clueless about. It doesn't apply to all aspects of life or everything in it.
And example would be a good thing for you to share here.
Maybe something like "the shortest distance between two points is a curved line", and then prove it?
I think you should use your brain to figure shit out and not make it about what box your theory fits in. You literally are running through life arguing from what narrative your ideas fit in. No matter how stupid they may be.
So, you think it makes sense to investigate the least likely suspects, and then go from there.
OK. We should probably start with the Pope, then every non-citizen, starting with kids who have just learned to speak, and moving on by age. Once we have done that, invesatigate Trump, then every child in every Democrat household, and continue by age.
After that, investigate every child in every Republican household in every state but Maryland. Continue by age.
Once you gotten theorugh those multiple biullions of people, start on the Republican households in Maryland.
SUPER-efficient way to look at the situation.
Kind of like checking your name on the title of your car as a first step in figuring out why it won't start.