Current events discussion

Don't forget DEI

To me it's racist to give a job to someone based on color rather than merit..
That is true. They relentlessly demean the white male and try and paste them as the devil and reason all that is bad in this world. Dems are trying to turn the entire country against them, just like how Hitler turned Germany against all Jews.
 
That is true. They relentlessly demean the white male and try and paste them as the devil and reason all that is bad in this world. Dems are trying to turn the entire country against them, just like how Hitler turned Germany against all Jews.

Yeah I don't get punishing people for shit that didn't even happen in their lifetime...
I don't know anybody that was a slave or owned slaves..

It's pretty phucked up for these demtards to compare Trump to Hitler too.. What a slap in the face to Jewish people.. I can't even process some shit like that... Are these people just stupid?
 
Yeah I don't get punishing people for shit that didn't even happen in their lifetime...
I don't know anybody that was a slave or owned slaves..

It's pretty phucked up for these demtards to compare Trump to Hitler too.. What a slap in the face to Jewish people.. I can't even process some shit like that... Are these people just stupid?
They crazy thing is every human alive has ancestors that were oppressed at some point in their history. Unfortunately, a massive number of people have decided to join in the victim Olympics. I remember not too long ago, we took pride in overcoming obstacles. Thx Team Blue.
 
Yeah I don't get punishing people for shit that didn't even happen in their lifetime...
I don't know anybody that was a slave or owned slaves..

It's pretty phucked up for these demtards to compare Trump to Hitler too.. What a slap in the face to Jewish people.. I can't even process some shit like that... Are these people just stupid?
I think it's more like insanity combined with stupidity. ***** for Palestine - I wouldn't believe anybody could be that delusional if I didn't see it with my own eyes.
 
Kinda like "most" somehow meant only Dem states supported segregation. Dude is delusional.
He is but he also believes that big lie of the parties switching when it comes to racism so its to be expected. That list I posted with confirmed klan members in office was predominantly D with a fair number of R. There will never be 100% consensus in any group no matter how you divide up the individuals.
 
He is but he also believes that big lie of the parties switching when it comes to racism so its to be expected. That list I posted with confirmed klan members in office was predominantly D with a fair number of R. There will never be 100% consensus in any group no matter how you divide up the individuals.
The real problem is the neomarxist like identity politics, which is divisive within itself, especially if everything is defined by our differences. Whoever sees life through identity politics like the left is on won't ever find the truth of anything.
 
I guess you already forgot that you claimed to understand "common sense".
Why, because I have opinions that you don't agree with?
It applies to a vast swath of life.
Again, not all life.
Feel free to give an example where it makes no sense to look at the simplest solution first.
When the status quo is never the simplest solution. When there are clearly other answers. When something is overly simplified then it was made to look that way. Haven't you ever heard the phrases "That was too easy" "Nothing is ever that easy" "Too neat" "Too perfect"?
Common sense says if that is their goal, they wouldn't lie in wait, hoping someone will flip on Trump, like MTG did.
Common sense says they create as many false flags as possible.
So she flipped on Trump right? Does that suddenly mean all the lefties who hated her, love her? How about if Trump decides he is Democrat again... Ya'll gonna embrace him and vote for him? If that is the case ALL of you left leaning liberals are bat shit ******* crazy and need to be under surveillance.
Again, your own argument is self-defeating.
Only to a narrow minded fool.
No, it's the application of common sense.
You brought it up b/c you don't understand Occam's Razor.
Jesus Christ. Stop making ******* claims you are clueless about. It doesn't apply to all aspects of life or everything in it.
Now you think common sense SHOULDN'T apply, when it works against your conspiracy theory?
I think you should use your brain to figure shit out and not make it about what box your theory fits in. You literally are running through life arguing from what narrative your ideas fit in. No matter how stupid they may be.
 
Last edited:
You have zero proof that most Americans were racist at any time, so what makes your think you can make that claim? Because you believe it's true is not proof.
You might want to go back and look at the laws and the state of the country in the past, before you make such a nonsense claim.

No proof that Americans were racist? Either you're 10 y.o. and know nothing of the history of our country, or you made it to adulthood without knowing a thing about the history of our country.

Read up on Briggs v. Elliot.
Go ahead, and tell me that the laws that existed back then are just my "beliefs", and not reality.
I look forward to reading that delusion.
 
Why, because I have opinions that you don't agree with?
Because YOU brought up "common sense" and then refuse to apply it to the situation.

Again, not all life.
That's a statement, not an example.
When the status quo is never the simplest solution. When there are clearly other answers. When something is overly simplified then it was made to look that way. Haven't you ever heard the phrases "That was too easy" "Nothing is ever that easy" "Too neat" "Too perfect"?
The simplest solution is not the most likely one when there is a status quo? That makes no sense at all.
Those phrases have no relevance to the natural order of things, nor Occam's Razor.
They describe situations where there are hidden, underlying factors that are unknown. If there are hidden, underlying factors, then the simplest solution was not met.

So she flipped on Trump right? Does that suddenly mean all the lefties who hated her, love her? How about if Trump decides he is Democrat again... Ya'll gonna embrace him and vote for him? If that is the case ALL of you left leaning liberals are bat shit ******* crazy and need to be under surveillance.
Why would you claim it was a Democrat threatening her, then claim that all Democrats love her because she flipped? Makes no sense, and it's a really weird assumption.
Only to a narrow minded fool.
Couldn't hold off on the name-calling for even a few days, huh? Good work.

When you contradict your own argument, it's self-defeating.

Jesus Christ. Stop making ******* claims you are clueless about. It doesn't apply to all aspects of life or everything in it.
And example would be a good thing for you to share here.
Maybe something like "the shortest distance between two points is a curved line", and then prove it?
I think you should use your brain to figure shit out and not make it about what box your theory fits in. You literally are running through life arguing from what narrative your ideas fit in. No matter how stupid they may be.
So, you think it makes sense to investigate the least likely suspects, and then go from there.
OK. We should probably start with the Pope, then every non-citizen, starting with kids who have just learned to speak, and moving on by age. Once we have done that, invesatigate Trump, then every child in every Democrat household, and continue by age.
After that, investigate every child in every Republican household in every state but Maryland. Continue by age.

Once you gotten theorugh those multiple biullions of people, start on the Republican households in Maryland.
SUPER-efficient way to look at the situation.

Kind of like checking your name on the title of your car as a first step in figuring out why it won't start.
 
Because YOU brought up "common sense" and then refuse to apply it to the situation.
You seem to think common sense is to blame the right for everything.
That's a statement, not an example.

The simplest solution is not the most likely one when there is a status quo? That makes no sense at all.
Those phrases have no relevance to the natural order of things, nor Occam's Razor.
They describe situations where there are hidden, underlying factors that are unknown. If there are hidden, underlying factors, then the simplest solution was not met.
None of what I say will have any relevance for you because you are far too narrow minded. You are perfectly fine accepting any result that will paint the right in a bad light. For you, there is no need or want of other answers. Nor would you accept them.
Why would you claim it was a Democrat threatening her, then claim that all Democrats love her because she flipped? Makes no sense, and it's a really weird assumption.
It absolutely could be a Democrat messing with her. Do you know who is doing it/did it?
Couldn't hold off on the name-calling for even a few days, huh? Good work.
I called nobody a name.
When you contradict your own argument, it's self-defeating.
I know. My opinions are in opposition to yours so by default MY argument is self-defeating.
And example would be a good thing for you to share here.
Maybe something like "the shortest distance between two points is a curved line", and then prove it?
Fold the fabric of space and it may very well be the shortest distance.
So, you think it makes sense to investigate the least likely suspects, and then go from there.
OK. We should probably start with the Pope, then every non-citizen, starting with kids who have just learned to speak, and moving on by age. Once we have done that, invesatigate Trump, then every child in every Democrat household, and continue by age.
After that, investigate every child in every Republican household in every state but Maryland. Continue by age.

Once you gotten theorugh those multiple biullions of people, start on the Republican households in Maryland.
SUPER-efficient way to look at the situation.

Kind of like checking your name on the title of your car as a first step in figuring out why it won't start.
Couldn't hold off even for a few days being a smart ***, sarcastic, talking down to people.
 
You seem to think common sense is to blame the right for everything.
Only for the things they should be blamed for.
None of what I say will have any relevance for you because you are far too narrow minded. You are perfectly fine accepting any result that will paint the right in a bad light. For you, there is no need or want of other answers. Nor would you accept them.
Still don't see a single example to help your support your argument. Just tangents.
It absolutely could be a Democrat messing with her. Do you know who is doing it/did it?
Occam's Razor applies even if it hurts your chosen narrative, because it doesn't care about your narrative.

I called nobody a name.
You ight want to learn a bit more about how words work.
I know. My opinions are in opposition to yours so by default MY argument is self-defeating.
No, your argument is self-defeating when you fully contradict yourself in trying to tsupport your claim.
Fold the fabric of space and it may very well be the shortest distance.
That's a fail, and it was just an example for you to understand the concept.
Make uup your own example, and support it.
Couldn't hold off even for a few days being a smart ***, sarcastic, talking down to people.
Like clockwork. The second your argument gets toasted and you have nothing to work with, you fall back on your same old ways.
 
Only for the things they should be blamed for.

Still don't see a single example to help your support your argument. Just tangents.

Occam's Razor applies even if it hurts your chosen narrative, because it doesn't care about your narrative.


You ight want to learn a bit more about how words work.

No, your argument is self-defeating when you fully contradict yourself in trying to tsupport your claim.

That's a fail, and it was just an example for you to understand the concept.
Make uup your own example, and support it.

Like clockwork. The second your argument gets toasted and you have nothing to work with, you fall back on your same old ways.
You're right Rob. You are right. My bad, I forgot you are not wrong about anything. You are right Rob. I should not have spoken up. You're right once again as always. I keep forgetting nobody is allowed to speak on your forum. MY BAD ROB. YOU ARE RIGHT. I SHOULD NOT HAVE QUESTIONED YOU. YOU ARE RIGHT ONCE AGAIN. I HOPE I CAN FIND SOME WAY TO LIVE WITH MYSELF FOR ENGAGING YOU ONCE AGAIN IN A ONCE SIDED CONVERSATION. I FORGOT YOUR RULES.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,800
Views
453,691
Last reply date
Last reply from
ThxOne
IMG_0710.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_0709.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top