Current events discussion

1755924972626.png


Reminds of that member here who lamented that Biden was an ahole for banning bumpstocks.
 
Yes, people made money off of the BLM movement. That was never under debate. My contention was that BLM was not a democrat organized movement, because it wasn't.
I get what you're saying. Anything to excuse your hypocrisy. Leftist organizations are beyond reproach because leftist organizations are beyond reproach. Just like you don't hold the Proud Boys or Oath Keepers responsible for their actions because they aren't officially part of the GOP.
And yes.....you brushed straight past thx's MULTIPLE posts too attack mine. Again....you can try and cover all you want....but you were playing defense for someone who you *claim* to not agree with. But right wingers under the MAGA cult tend to gang up and side with one another because it's team over principle.

lol....I mean....come on with stuff like this vvvvvvvvv
Just because you have a cult mentality doesn't mean I do. Again, you're in a thread that I started specifically to criticize Trump. You're just pissed that I dared to hold up the mirror that reveals your hypocrisy.
Team Blue is "pro-crime". But fortunately.....the guy extorting private businesses and colleges, shitting on the emolument clause, pardoning his January 6th rioters, pardoning people's family members who pay him, weaponizing agencies against his enemies, etc.....is a law abiding citizen.

Get out of the echo chamber every once in a while. What you're claiming to me doesn't jive with reality, dog.

As for the files implicating Trump.....I mean....multiple sources saying that his name was in the files. And then a complete 180 on the file release. You do the math.
Everybody knows Trump & Epstein have a past. That doesn't make Trump a pedo and it certainly doesn't explain why BidenCo didn't use it to stop the biggest threat to democracy since that German fella in the 1940s. Furthermore, keep in mind your conspiracy theory is built upon a right wing conspiracy theory courtesy of Alex Jones - that's pretty shakey ground. Epstein Island is 1 of the 3 conspiracies that Jones got right out of the thousands he's put out there.

Assuming Epstein really has an extortion list, then it's my best guess, that any and everybody regardless of their party affiliation will sit on it and use if for its intended purpose - extortion. If you were a world leader with a list like what Epstein supposedly had, would you cough it up? Or what makes more sense is there is no list. Compiling a list like that is a good way to end up sleeping with the fishes.
 
Last edited:
Of course, this was after a dozen or more posts where you showed us all how you had no understanding of said phrase.

And if you thought ANYONE was being literal and suggesting you were on a ship, unable to to do simple calcualtions, then you really ARE hopelessly behind the curve.

View attachment 67424
You know what's not in your wheelhouse? Voting for the correct party. Come on board with us. It's nice on the MAGA side of life. On the MAGA side we care about other people. Even if like you they can't spell calculations.
 
Last edited:
Trump fires anyone who reveals the truth about his shitheel self.

1755926785656.png


A senior CIA officer who oversaw Russia analysis has been stripped of her security clearance, part of a sweeping removal of 37 serving and former officials accused of "betray[ing] their oath to the Constitution," the Economist reported on Aug. 21.

The officer, who served as the CIA’s top Russia and Eurasia analyst during the 2016 election and helped produce the report detailing Moscow’s interference on behalf of Donald Trump, was among the most senior career officials targeted. Shelby Pierson and Vinh Nguyen, who also worked on the 2016 assessment, were similarly purged. Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, confirmed the revocations on Aug. 19.
 
You know what's not in your wheelhouse? Voting for the correct party. Come on board with us. It's nice on the MAGA side of life. On the MAGA side we care about other people. Even if like you they can't spell calculations.
A typo is one thing, not knowing what the phrase "in your wheelhouse" means whenb you are in your 50's is an entireley different one.

The "correct party"? You mean the Grand Old ********* party, defenders of rapists, felons, insurrectionists, Nazis, racists?
The party that has given us a worse economy for 75 years and counting?
The party in power for 10 of the 11 recessions we have had since WWII?

Damn son, if that's the "correct party", I can't imagine what the "incorrect" party would be.
 
A typo is one thing, not knowing what the phrase "in your wheelhouse" means whenb you are in your 50's is an entireley different one.

The "correct party"? You mean the Grand Old ********* party, defenders of rapists, felons, insurrectionists, Nazis, racists?
The party that has given us a worse economy for 75 years and counting?
The party in power for 10 of the 11 recessions we have had since WWII?

Damn son, if that's the "correct party", I can't imagine what the "incorrect" party would be.
I do like to root for the underdog!

By the by... you misspelled "when" and "entirely". Just sayin.
 
Last edited:
Oh Jimi.... I actually stated a long time ago in yonder thread that has since been locked that many things I say is to get under the skin of one RobGMN. Some things I say I make sure I am ultra literal and for some weird reason that screws him up more than claiming Trump did not r*pe that woman.
That's what's odd about Rob. Usually half way intelligent human beings can see the difference when somebody is being literal or not. Most people are making that distinction on a subconscious level and switching between literal and non litral without a thought. Yet Rob seems to struggle with this ability, which is fine. Maybe IRL, Rob is used to looking for visual clues, which don't exist on the intrawebz or maybe it's something he just struggles with.

But if you're having a hard time understanding when something is literal or not, just take our word for it and move on.**8
 
That's what's odd about Rob. Usually half way intelligent human beings can see the difference when somebody is being literal or not. Most people are making that distinction on a subconscious level and switching between literal and non litral without a thought. Yet Rob seems to struggle with this ability, which is fine. Maybe IRL, Rob is used to looking for visual clues, which don't exist on the intrawebz or maybe it's something he just struggles with.
So, was I not supposed to take you literally when you declared that we do not have innate rights as humans?
Was that supposed to just be one of your personal "figures of speech", and you actually do not believe the claim?
Was I not supposed to take you literally when you said you sought the advice of your 12 y.o. to confirm your beliefs?
Was I not supposed to take you literally when you said the CPI has beeen "fake forever"?
Was I not supposed to take you literally when you claimed you personally witnessed an illegal immigrant who was open on Federal medicaid?
Was I not supposed to take you literally when you said no money had been lost when the market plunged 10% due to TACO Donald's stupidass tariff plan and announcement?
Was I not supposed to take you literally when you defended Trump as not being a ******, even though the court case very clearly shows he is, and the judge even clarified it?

As for Trump, since per your claim "Sleepy Joe" was not literal, I guess when he wanted to call him "Creepy Joe", or "Corrupt Joe", he didn't want to say Biden casued unpleasant feelings or unease, or that he was willing to be dishonest for personal gain. What he REALLY meant was that Biden inches along very slowly when he moves, or that his data on his computer is scrambled and no longer working.

What odd monikers to choose.

But if you're having a hard time understanding when something is literal or not, just take our word for it and move on.**8
 
Wel, yew sea, whin yew mispel werds peeple may fined it hard two understand whut yew r saiying.
Maybe people with low IQs.
People with higher levels of intelligence can sort things on the fly and adapt more quickly. Good old cognitive flexibility, pattern recognition, data organization, etc.

That's why dolts don't become fighter pilots.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,853
Views
465,148
Last reply date
Last reply from
Jimi77
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top