Current events discussion

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You should claim victory now because I lost interest. You can win by default.



No, you vote them into office.

I didn't vote for Trump. EITHER time.

It doesn't even occur in your narrow mind that helping people would mean you would have a different career.

If I wasn't a Fraud Investigator, the job wouldn't exist?
Or do you mean if fraud wasn't investigated and prosecuted, fraud would stop existing?

You can tell it has never even entered your mind to help people. I bet you walk past women and old people without holding the door for them and you just walk right through the door.

I've never walked through a door in my life. The known laws of physics prevent it.
I open and hold doors for people all the time. What's really interesting is how few people actually say "thank you". When they don't, I usually say "you're welcome". Probably louder than I do to those who say "thank you".

Damn you are dense. Those aren't excuses and I have not used anything I have said as a defense for him that he would not be guilty. I ask questions. I am not like you and just assume everyone is guilty.

excuse - attempt to lessen the blame attaching to (a fault or offense); seek to defend or justify.
Exactly what you did.
"It says devices linked to him. Doesn't mean they are his. Could be computers at his office that other people use." - Thxone
What are you basing this particular defense on? What do you know about the situation?
Where did it say it was a computer at his office?
Where did it say he works in an office?
Where did it say he works at an office with other people?

You created a scenario out of thin air to defend him.
That would be and EXCUSE.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I didn't vote for Trump. EITHER time.

So what's that tell ya? You keep making the wrong choices in life.

If I wasn't a Fraud Investigator, the job wouldn't exist?
Or do you mean if fraud wasn't investigated and prosecuted, fraud would stop existing?

Is that how your brain works it out? Two paths to walk down. Help people. Punish people. You chose the otra. What does that say about your character?

I've never walked through a door in my life. The known laws of physics prevent it.

Sure, if it's a solid door. Smart ***.

I open and hold doors for people all the time. What's really interesting is how few people actually say "thank you". When they don't, I usually say "you're welcome". Probably louder than I do to those who say "thank you".

Younger women and men tend to not say thank you.

excuse - attempt to lessen the blame attaching to (a fault or offense); seek to defend or justify.
Exactly what you did.

Even as I sit here and tell you no, that is not what I did. You claim it is and you run with it.

"It says devices linked to him. Doesn't mean they are his. Could be computers at his office that other people use." - Thxone
What are you basing this particular defense on? What do you know about the situation?
Where did it say it was a computer at his office?
Where did it say he works in an office?
Where did it say he works at an office with other people?

How are the computerS linked to him?

You created a scenario out of thin air to defend him.
That would be and EXCUSE.

You are incorrect again. Answer the question.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So what's that tell ya? You keep making the wrong choices in life.

Not voting for a ******/felon/****** predator/pathological liar is definitely a RIGHT choice.

Is that how your brain works it out? Two paths to walk down. Help people. Punish people. You chose the otra. What does that say about your character?

So it upsets you that people get punished for breaking the law.
How long were you incarcerated in order to develop such a love for criminaals, and a desire to defend their actions?

Sure, if it's a solid door. Smart ***.

If it's not solid, it's not a door. It's a hole in a wall.
Way to miss the sarcasm.

Younger women and men tend to not say thank you.

Entitled shits.

Even as I sit here and tell you no, that is not what I did. You claim it is and you run with it.

Cool. So who made the post in your name?

How are the computerS linked to him?

Who knows? But they were linked to him, which is what matters to get him arrested.
It's incumbent on him and his lawyers to prove he isn't responsible for the **** on them. In a court of law "maybe someone else did it" is not a defense. At least not one that will get him anywhere.

You are incorrect again. Answer the question.

"Could be computers at his office that other people use." - Thxone

Out of thin air.
No mention was made that he worked in an office.
No mention was made that he worked with other people.
No mention was made of it being on a computer.

AND it disregards that he admitted to police on July 24th (while they were executing a search warrant on his HOME) that his **** interests include children.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Not voting for a ******/felon/****** predator/pathological liar is definitely a RIGHT choice.

Did you see him **** or are you taking other peoples second hand words for it? Do you see him being a ****** predator? How is he doing it? 30K Right?

So it upsets you that people get punished for breaking the law.

Not at all. Way to miss my point all together.

How long were you incarcerated in order to develop such a love for criminaals, and a desire to defend their actions?

How long before you figured out your deep, deep desire to please men.... sexually? Are you done with the stupid questions?

If it's not solid, it's not a door. It's a hole in a wall.
Way to miss the sarcasm.

Doors do not have to be solid.

Entitled shits.

Indeed.

Cool. So who made the post in your name?

Again, just because YOU claim you know what I did does not make it true or fact. You are literally assuming and you are wrong.

Who knows? But they were linked to him, which is what matters to get him arrested.
It's incumbent on him and his lawyers to prove he isn't responsible for the **** on them. In a court of law "maybe someone else did it" is not a defense. At least not one that will get him anywhere.

Yet to you, he is already guilty. Is this your mentality in your job as well?

"Could be computers at his office that other people use." - Thxone

Out of thin air.
No mention was made that he worked in an office.
No mention was made that he worked with other people.
No mention was made of it being on a computer.

AND it disregards that he admitted to police on July 24th (while they were executing a search warrant on his HOME) that his **** interests include children.

I don't care what the cops claim he said. Unless it is an unedited video of him saying it, it is all hearsay.

It is not out of thin air. It clearly says computerS with an S as in multiple.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

It's getting to be real end times like

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Did you see him **** or are you taking other peoples second hand words for it? Do you see him being a ****** predator? How is he doing it? 30K Right?

Ahhh, so the Democrats you posted about earlier: You SAW them doing it. Because you'de never take "peoples second hand words" for it.
How was it you were witness to all the acts that you claimed they did?

Trump admitted to being a ****** predator. No need to witness it.
Or was he lying, just to make Trump look bad?

Not at all. Way to miss my point all together.

You say that they are hurt and suffer because they get punished for breaking the law, and you defend their actions. But it doesn't bother you that it happens? Then why are you bringing it up? Why are you defending them?

How long before you figured out your deep, deep desire to please men.... sexually? Are you done with the stupid questions?

I'm not the one who had to be taught wheter to like boys or girls. That was you.
I knew innately what attracted me. Maybe not WHY at first, but I figured it out.

You seem really interested in male-male ***. Did you learn about it in jail?

Doors do not have to be solid.

Then they aren't a door.

Indeed.

Again, just because YOU claim you know what I did does not make it true or fact. You are literally assuming and you are wrong.

Not the question I asked.
Who made the post in your name, if it was not you?

Yet to you, he is already guilty. Is this your mentality in your job as well?

Trouble comprehending again? i said the courts will detemrine whether he is guilty.
He has admitted guilt the second time around. Why should I refuse to accept that?
Is he doing it just to make Trump look bad?

I don't care what the cops claim he said. Unless it is an unedited video of him saying it, it is all hearsay.

Not how hearsay works. You should go back to school.
And, yet another defense with no basis. Who said the cop didn't have a body cam? Strurgeon Bay LE uses them while on duty. Have done so since 2021. Axon-3.
They cannot erase or edit what is captured on the cameras.

It is not out of thin air. It clearly says computerS with an S as in multiple.

Where did it say he had the **** on a computer or on computerS?
Whwere did it say it was in an office?
Where did it say other people worked where the **** was found?
NOWHERE.

So you crafted a defense out of thin air. Criminals tend to do that.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Ahhh, so the Democrats you posted about earlier: You SAW them doing it. Because you'de never take "peoples second hand words" for it.
How was it you were witness to all the acts that you claimed they did?

Trump admitted to being a ****** predator. No need to witness it.
Or was he lying, just to make Trump look bad?

You say that they are hurt and suffer because they get punished for breaking the law, and you defend their actions. But it doesn't bother you that it happens? Then why are you bringing it up? Why are you defending them?


I'm not the one who had to be taught wheter to like boys or girls. That was you.
I knew innately what attracted me. Maybe not WHY at first, but I figured it out.

You seem really interested in male-male ***. Did you learn about it in jail?

Then they aren't a door.

Not the question I asked.
Who made the post in your name, if it was not you?

Trouble comprehending again? i said the courts will detemrine whether he is guilty.
He has admitted guilt the second time around. Why should I refuse to accept that?
Is he doing it just to make Trump look bad?

Not how hearsay works. You should go back to school.
And, yet another defense with no basis. Who said the cop didn't have a body cam? Strurgeon Bay LE uses them while on duty. Have done so since 2021. Axon-3.
They cannot erase or edit what is captured on the cameras.

Where did it say he had the **** on a computer or on computerS?
Whwere did it say it was in an office?
Where did it say other people worked where the **** was found?
NOWHERE.

So you crafted a defense out of thin air. Criminals tend to do that.

Stfu already you hypocrite

What's the truth about Ashley Biden's 'showers with my dad' claims?

Ashley herself has now confirmed that the diary is indeed authentic. 'Hyper-sexualized @ a young age,' she writes in a July 2019 entry. 'What is this due to? Was I molested. I think so.'

www.dailymail.co.uk

Oh geez it only makes perfect sense you moron, you can't see what's right in front of your face.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

That's what ai and quantum is basically is an alien invasion into our dimension through quantum technology hooked up to our robots and internet, where basically a vampiric force wants to rule humanity via transhumanism

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Ahhh, so the Democrats you posted about earlier: You SAW them doing it. Because you'de never take "peoples second hand words" for it.
How was it you were witness to all the acts that you claimed they did?

You are the one who assigns guilt to accusations. I was showing you that Democrats get accused too. I never said anyone was guilty of anything.

Trump admitted to being a ****** predator. No need to witness it.
Or was he lying, just to make Trump look bad?

No he didn't. He admitted you can grab chicks by the *****. Which is factual. I have done it myself.

You say that they are hurt and suffer because they get punished for breaking the law, and you defend their actions. But it doesn't bother you that it happens? Then why are you bringing it up? Why are you defending them?

Nobody is defending their actions and punishments are to make people hurt and suffer... that is the nature of the deterrent.

I'm not the one who had to be taught wheter to like boys or girls. That was you.
I knew innately what attracted me. Maybe not WHY at first, but I figured it out.

So you admit that it is natural to like girls if you are born a boy and to like boy if you are born a girl... you finally submit to biological facts.

You seem really interested in male-male ***. Did you learn about it in jail?

You can't spin that. You made an ignorant statement so I threw one right back at you. Now you want to continue your ignorant statements. At least get up off your knees and wipe your mouth off.

Then they aren't a door.

Yes they are. Definition of a door - A usually swinging or sliding barrier by which an entry is closed and opened. Barriers do not have to be solid or opaque.

Not the question I asked.
Who made the post in your name, if it was not you?

Me confirming that I made the post does not mean you re-posted what I said. You rarely do. You love to post your assumptions and claim they are others thoughts.

Trouble comprehending again? i said the courts will detemrine whether he is guilty.
He has admitted guilt the second time around. Why should I refuse to accept that?
Is he doing it just to make Trump look bad?

Did he accept guilt with a lawyer present? On video? Under duress? While being coerced?

Not how hearsay works. You should go back to school.

It is EXACTLY how it works.

Hearsay -
information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor.

Just because the cops say he fessed up does not mean it's true. Show me the video confession or the signed confession verified by his attorney. OTHERWISE IT IS HEARSAY.

And, yet another defense with no basis. Who said the cop didn't have a body cam? Strurgeon Bay LE uses them while on duty. Have done so since 2021. Axon-3.
They cannot erase or edit what is captured on the cameras.

Show the footage then.

Where did it say he had the **** on a computer or on computerS?
Whwere did it say it was in an office?
Where did it say other people worked where the **** was found?
NOWHERE.

So you crafted a defense out of thin air. Criminals tend to do that.

It's not a defense moron. People ask questions to get information. To fill in gaps to a story. So they do not rush to judgment or form an opinion of guilt without all of the evidence. Like you do. Cause ya know, Orange Man Bad.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

There is no need to argue anything I just posted but RobGMN is going to.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You are the one who assigns guilt to accusations. I was showing you that Democrats get accused too. I never said anyone was guilty of anything.

So we were both showing accusations (plus Soucek's admission of guilt), but me doing it is not OK?
Interesting spin.

Why is it not OK for me to do it, but OK for YOU?

No he didn't. He admitted you can grab chicks by the *****. Which is factual. I have done it myself.

Incorrect. He admitted to letting himself uninvited into the Miss Teen pageant dressing rooms, and walking amongst girls in various stages of undress.
Pedo ****** predator.

And I guess you ignored the tape of him commenting on a 10 y.o. girl at a mall.
Or all the video of him trying to kiss little kids on the lips.

Nobody is defending their actions and punishments are to make people hurt and suffer... that is the nature of the deterrent.

So it's a good thing. You have no problem with me or the people who are on the proper side of the equation.
Got it.

So you admit that it is natural to like girls if you are born a boy and to like boy if you are born a girl... you finally submit to biological facts.

Trying to put words in my mouth again.
I said no such thing.

Stop trying to to claim I'm stating your false narrative and beliefs for you.

You can't spin that. You made an ignorant statement so I threw one right back at you. Now you want to continue your ignorant statements. At least get up off your knees and wipe your mouth off.

You have made probably hundreds of posts about male-make ****** activity.
It's not "spin" to say you are obviously interested and maybe even obsessed with the idea.

Was it with you all your life? Is that why you had to be taught to like girls?
That's a pretty common occurrence back in the day. A child expresses their true identity, and it gets hammered down by a dumb adult for being "wrong".
Religion often factors heavily in it.

Yes they are. Definition of a door - A usually swinging or sliding barrier by which an entry is closed and opened. Barriers do not have to be solid or opaque.

A barrier for us humans is a solid. If it's not solid, we can go around it.
A hole is not a door.

Funny that you still miss the original sarcasm, even after I told you it was there.

Me confirming that I made the post does not mean you re-posted what I said. You rarely do. You love to post your assumptions and claim they are others thoughts.

You confirm the post was made, but that doesn't mean the post was made?

"There is no list, but my name was put on the list by Clinton and Obama"

Did he accept guilt with a lawyer present? On video? Under duress? While being coerced?

A lawyer doesn't have to be present for someone to admit guilt.
If there's a warrant out for you for stealing a car and you turn yourself in, a lawyer doesn't have to be present for you to admit guilt.
A lawyer doesn't even have to be present in court for you to admit guilt.

It is EXACTLY how it works.

Nope. Go back to school.
An admission of guilt to a police officer is not considered hearsay in a court of law.

Hearsay -
information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor.

Just because the cops say he fessed up does not mean it's true. Show me the video confession or the signed confession verified by his attorney. OTHERWISE IT IS HEARSAY.

Incorrect, again.
An admission of guilt to a police officer is not considered hearsay in a court of law.

Show the footage then.

Show me your warrant. Are you a judge now?

It's not a defense moron. People ask questions to get information. To fill in gaps to a story. So they do not rush to judgment or form an opinion of guilt without all of the evidence. Like you do. Cause ya know, Orange Man Bad.

Statements are not questions. You made the statement in order to defend him.

Share all the "questions" you asked about those Democrats whose exploits you posted earlier.
Show us all how you didn't rush to judgment and post examples that had nothing to do with what we were talking about.
Explain how you witnessed them doing the acts that are all alleged in your post.

Remember, YOU are the one who "thinks outside of the box" and will not accept something as a truth unless he witnesses it firsthand.
Tell us what you saw, and how you saw it.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So we were both showing accusations (plus Soucek's admission of guilt), but me doing it is not OK?
Interesting spin.

That's your spin. I didn't say it was or wasn't ok for anyone. Can you please stop making every damn conversation an argument. Stop inventing hidden meanings in everything someone post.

Why is it not OK for me to do it, but OK for YOU?

.................... This is America, you can do as you please. I am not a liberal so I would not presume to infringe on that right either.

Incorrect. He admitted to letting himself uninvited into the Miss Teen pageant dressing rooms, and walking amongst girls in various stages of undress.
Pedo ****** predator.

Ok so you are comfortable saying he is guilty. I am telling you I need more and or credible information to form an opinion of guilt. I am going to leave it at that.

And I guess you ignored the tape of him commenting on a 10 y.o. girl at a mall.
Or all the video of him trying to kiss little kids on the lips.

I cannot ignore something I have never seen nor heard. I am unfamiliar with this guy and only know of him because you were looking for something to use to make Trump look bad.

So it's a good thing. You have no problem with me or the people who are on the proper side of the equation.
Got it.

My only problem with you Rob is you jump to conclusions way too fast. You speak for others and you run with assumptions. Other than that, you may be a decent guy, hell, I don't know.

Trying to put words in my mouth again.
I said no such thing.

Not "words"

Stop trying to to claim I'm stating your false narrative and beliefs for you.

You don't know what my beliefs are and I have no narratives.

You have made probably hundreds of posts about male-make ****** activity.
It's not "spin" to say you are obviously interested and maybe even obsessed with the idea.

Stop, you are getting me hard.

Was it with you all your life? Is that why you had to be taught to like girls?
That's a pretty common occurrence back in the day. A child expresses their true identity, and it gets hammered down by a dumb adult for being "wrong".
Religion often factors heavily in it.

School taught us basic biology. We were taught how babies were made. What a penis and ******'s were for. You aren't born knowing how reproductive organs work. On my own I was always into females. All the way back to my first erection.

A barrier for us humans is a solid. If it's not solid, we can go around it.
A hole is not a door.

It's solid for you. For dictionary definitions and the rest of the world it doesn't have to be solid. Like the mesh screen doors hung in front of doors to keep out bugs... it's a barrier but not solid. It is also transparent.

Funny that you still miss the original sarcasm, even after I told you it was there.

Not mentioning it is not missing it. You need to stop thinking you are the only one on planet Houston who has a brain.

You confirm the post was made, but that doesn't mean the post was made?

Again... when you drag something on and on I lose interest and no longer know what you are talking about.

"There is no list, but my name was put on the list by Clinton and Obama"

?

A lawyer doesn't have to be present for someone to admit guilt.
If there's a warrant out for you for stealing a car and you turn yourself in, a lawyer doesn't have to be present for you to admit guilt.
A lawyer doesn't even have to be present in court for you to admit guilt.

God damn. Nobody said a lawyer has to be present. Again, when you make dumb statements like this I question your comprehension.

Nope. Go back to school.
An admission of guilt to a police officer is not considered hearsay in a court of law.

Guess what, If I am on the jury and all they have is a cop saying well judge, he admitted guilt to me. I am not accepting that.

Incorrect, again.
An admission of guilt to a police officer is not considered hearsay in a court of law.

Stop repeating yourself.

Show me your warrant. Are you a judge now?

A warrant is not needed. You can simply request the footage through the proper channels. FOIA.

Statements are not questions. You made the statement in order to defend him.

How the **** are you going to argue with me about the questions I ask??? If I tell you they are questions then **** you to hell and back if you then take them as statements.

Share all the "questions" you asked about those Democrats whose exploits you posted earlier.
Show us all how you didn't rush to judgment and post examples that had nothing to do with what we were talking about.
Explain how you witnessed them doing the acts that are all alleged in your post.

Thank you. Thank you for proving you don't read the entire post when people respond to you. I literally said I posted those to show that Democrats get accused too and that I had no thoughts of guilt about any of them. Good job Rob.

Remember, YOU are the one who "thinks outside of the box" and will not accept something as a truth unless he witnesses it firsthand.
Tell us what you saw, and how you saw it.

Don't know the guy and have never heard of anything to do with him.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

That's your spin. I didn't say it was or wasn't ok for anyone. Can you please stop making every damn conversation an argument. Stop inventing hidden meanings in everything someone post.

So all your bitching about me posting that stuff is not really bitching.
It's just you reporting to everyone that I'm making posts that they can already see.
Why?

.................... This is America, you can do as you please. I am not a liberal so I would not presume to infringe on that right either.

Liberals are the ones fighting to keep dickheads like Trump from infringing on our rights.
But his followers love to be controlled, so they cheer him on when he does whatever he can to step all over our rights.

Ok so you are comfortable saying he is guilty. I am telling you I need more and or credible information to form an opinion of guilt. I am going to leave it at that.

He is guilty by his by own admission.
You think I should step up and defend him against st his own admission of guilt?
What evidence should I be using g to defend him of his own admission of guilt?

Make up stories like you do?
Maybe I could claim he is blind and can't even SEE ****?

cannot ignore something I have never seen nor heard. I am unfamiliar with this guy and only know of him because you were looking for something to use to make Trump look bad.

You are unfamiliar with him, yet you deposited a defense of his actions. A defense that includes information you could never possibly know about him.

And you did so simply because he and his wife are Trump followers, and his wife is a politician, and you'll defend any right winger to the death no matter what.
Even **********.

My only problem with you Rob is you jump to conclusions way too fast. You speak for others and you run with assumptions. Other than that, you may be a decent guy, hell, I don't know.

"Jump to conclusions".
You mean like immediately assuming that a self admitted ********* did not download child **** to his computer, and that someone else in his office did it instead?

Not "words"

You don't know what my beliefs are and I have no narratives.

Your posts prove otherwise.
Open book.

Stop, you are getting me hard.

School taught us basic biology. We were taught how babies were made. What a penis and ******'s were for. You aren't born knowing how reproductive organs work. On my own I was always into females. All the way back to my first erection.

Interesting scientific theory.
Tell us: Who was the first human to teach humans how to reproduce?
Where do wild animals take lessons to learn how to use their *** organs?
How about insects?

What part of your basic biology delved into the incredibly complex science of how the brain works, and what chapter taught you that having a penis or ****** determines how your brain will develop?
What book?

It's solid for you. For dictionary definitions and the rest of the world it doesn't have to be solid. Like the mesh screen doors hung in front of doors to keep out bugs... it's a barrier but not solid. It is also transparent.

You think the material that is woven to make screens is not a solid?
I suppose tmsince you can walk through a stand of pine trees, they minuet not be solid?
How about wood lattice? The wood part is not solid?

You've once again turn the science community upside down, and proved them wrong about the most basic theories of what a solid is.
ANAZING.

Not mentioning it is not missing it. You need to stop thinking you are the only one on planet Houston who has a brain.

You must be into rocket surgery.

Again... when you drag something on and on I lose interest and no longer know what you are talking about.

More like you feign a higher level of stupidity when you get proved wrong.

?

Self-contradiction.
Not a difficult concept, even with that single sentence.

?


God damn. Nobody said a lawyer has to be present. Again, when you make dumb statements like this I question your comprehension.

Then why did you ask if a lawyer was present when he made his admission of guilt?
Were you hoping to do an oil painting of the situation?

Guess what, If I am on the jury and all they have is a cop saying well judge, he admitted guilt to me. I am not accepting that.

Then you won't be on a jury. You don't get to decide how the legal system works.

Stop repeating yourself.

Repetition is a way to help people of low intellect understand a concept.

A warrant is not needed. You can simply request the footage through the proper channels. FOIA.

I am not subject to FOIA. If I have something and you want to see it, you can only compel me with a warrant.
Falls behind you the ball is behind you

How the **** are you going to argue with me about the questions I ask??? If I tell you they are questions then **** you to hell and back if you then take them as statements.

Statements are not questions, no matter how much you claim they are.

Thank you. Thank you for proving you don't read the entire post when people respond to you. I literally said I posted those to show that Democrats get accused too and that I had no thoughts of guilt about any of them. Good job Rob.

Ohhh, so THAT is supposed to be taken literally? But NOT when you state a defense for a pedo? THAT is supposed to be taken as questions, and not literally?

Don't know the guy and have never heard of anything to do with him.

So how can you make an excuse that someone in his office messed with his computer/s?

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

How dare they use a pretty white girl to sell product. Clearly, they are a bunch of r@cists advertising to a bunch of other r@cists.

I’ll leave this here

Beyoncé’s Levi’s campaign dragged into Sydney Sweeney jeans controversy

Comparisons between the two denim campaigns have triggered a wider conversation about race, beauty standards, and coded language in fashion ads.

www.easterneye.biz