Conveyor belt + Plane = Fly?

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

Plenty of air will be moving over the wings...

How does a plane in water take off?

Retards.

nG

 

[qtipextra 5,000+ posts]

Plenty of air will be moving over the wings...

But will it?

If you think about it, the planes wheels will be moving, but the plane will not be going anywhere, therefore how could it have air over the wings? Just curious about your reasoning

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

But will it?
If you think about it, the planes wheels will be moving, but the plane will not be going anywhere, therefore how could it have air over the wings? Just curious about your reasoning

Read the other thread r-tard...

It's explained about 10times...

nG

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

The real question is;

Can a plane in 2-dimensional Flatland fly ?

 

[qtipextra 5,000+ posts]

Read the other thread r-tard...
It's explained about 10times...

nG

Too much reading. I read all day at work and all day at school. Then all day at home. I just want to read little bits of things

 

[19psi 10+ year member]

yes it takes off. jet engines apply thrust to the air, not the ground. it's all independent of wheel speed. as the plane accelerates, so do the wheels and the treadmill. the wheels go 2x as fast as normal due to the reverse motion of the treadmill but hte plane continues ahead at normal speed. it's the wheels job to keep up with the plane and the treadmill not the other way around.

 

[GoochJuice]

yes it takes off. jet engines apply thrust to the air, not the ground. it's all independent of wheel speed. as the plane accelerates, so do the wheels and the treadmill. the wheels go 2x as fast as normal due to the reverse motion of the treadmill but hte plane continues ahead at normal speed. it's the wheels job to keep up with the plane and the treadmill not the other way around.

there is another thread about this that you should check out.

the main issue seems to be that people are misunderstanding what is suppose to be going on (me included). people are assuming that the idea is that the plane i suppose to be stationary (ie treadmill pulls back and then the plane speeds up and slows down to esentially be "motionless") and then somehow is able to take off. which is where the argument comes from.

once i was more informed on what the myth was actually getting at , i quickly realized why people still thought it wouldnt take off.

 

[19psi 10+ year member]

yeah, if the plane never moves, obviously it will never take off. the question wants to make us believe the plane wont' move, but after some thought, the plane HAS to move, as the jet's are working against the air, not hte tread mill.

 

[azbass 5,000+ posts]

I think the thrust of the engines will blow the top off kari.

thats my answer.

 

[azbass 5,000+ posts]

Plenty of air will be moving over the wings...
How does a plane in water take off?

Retards.

nG

on water //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[Justinw303 10+ year member]

Yes.

 

[ThatChevyGuy 5,000+ posts]

what was the answer

 

[joetama 5,000+ posts]

I think the thrust of the engines will blow the top off kari.
thats my answer.

I hope it blows her pants off...

 

[UndercoverPunk 5,000+ posts]

I hope she blows my pants off.

 

[joetama 5,000+ posts]

OH snap...