Cascade Designs Omega subwoofer

why not make the magnet wider? if you look at pro audio drivers, the magnets are short and wide as hell. they can take a beating and their super efficient. stacking magnets is a sale scheme

 
why not make the magnet wider? if you look at pro audio drivers, the magnets are short and wide as hell. they can take a beating and their super efficient. stacking magnets is a sale scheme
I dont know if I would argue its a sales scheme, name a subwoofer that has a record that is single stack?

 
why not make the magnet wider? if you look at pro audio drivers, the magnets are short and wide as hell. they can take a beating and their super efficient. stacking magnets is a sale scheme
It also cuts down cost considerably. The larger ferrite mags are EXPENSIVE. lets take the good ole btl here for example (because its perfect for it.) the single 11.25" slug costs more than the 3 previous 220mm slugs Also- stacking magnets is an inexpensive way to gain more clearance. Again, lets use the btl for referance. Look at the backplate on the new one. it is very deep. that is for clearance. and again, that requires more steel to be used, and steel=costs more than small ferrite.

 
why not make the magnet wider? if you look at pro audio drivers, the magnets are short and wide as hell. they can take a beating and their super efficient. stacking magnets is a sale scheme
Umm...idk about you but I seem to recall seeing many high end subs that people go nuts about when they see them, having very narrow and tall magnet structures. It also seems more efficient that way, but nothin wrong with a beefy *** tripple-quad+ stacked magnet:D

 
It also cuts down cost considerably. The larger ferrite mags are EXPENSIVE. lets take the good ole btl here for example (because its perfect for it.) the single 11.25" slug costs more than the 3 previous 220mm slugs Also- stacking magnets is an inexpensive way to gain more clearance. Again, lets use the btl for referance. Look at the backplate on the new one. it is very deep. that is for clearance. and again, that requires more steel to be used, and steel=costs more than small ferrite.
agreed.

i say it a mt with a new top plate straight from chinaaaaaa

cost what like 62 bucks?

lol...kick an mt's ***...glad to see your aiming for a sub that's what 6 years old now? really ahead of the curve dumbasses...let's be better then something that every other company that 'makes' subs has.

****in stupid

 
coffington.png


thats not me //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif Ive only been to alaska once, and that was to pick up a dead hooker:fyi:

 
screw cost.... if you want the baddest woofer on the planet go wide... almost as wide as the cone... see what you get when you that. could you imagine an 18' with 101 db iffeciency?

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

bumpin buick

5,000+ posts
Science is everything
Thread starter
bumpin buick
Joined
Location
Appleton, Wisconsin
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
292
Views
25,937
Last reply date
Last reply from
DDbump
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_2118.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top