cactus pf600.1

[sanman 10+ year member]

nice collection of amps man im in orion heaven

 

[revrider1 5,000+ posts]

Lol, Thanks...

I have been wanting to try Cactus amps...

 

[sanman 10+ year member]

great amps this is our first one and im impressed for sure

 

[AudioXtremes 10+ year member]

I am doing something right, and im not changing anything just because you dont like it.

It's not that I don't like it. It's that your doing it wrong. Peak hold takes the highest of both voltage and amps. But they both have peaks when the other figure is lower. So your not seeing real watts. There is a reason your the only person to test over 10k out of a Z2. And amazingly you test 1000 watts more than scottie j on the 40.1? All your numbers are higher than I have seen tested by competitors I trust.

 

[ssackett 10+ year member]

Interesting..

 

[mcsoul 10+ year member]

.707 ?

 

[Cabin_Pressure 10+ year member]

True RMS

 

[DUMPED 10+ year member]

It's not that I don't like it. It's that your doing it wrong. Peak hold takes the highest of both voltage and amps. But they both have peaks when the other figure is lower. So your not seeing real watts. There is a reason your the only person to test over 10k out of a Z2. And amazingly you test 1000 watts more than scottie j on the 40.1? All your numbers are higher than I have seen tested by competitors I trust.

thank you for speaking up //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

the OP just doesnt seem to understand that he is wrong in his findings and testing

 

[Skip01 5,000+ posts]

All the tests for the other amps was at 17v and .22 ohm nominal?

 

[mcsoul 10+ year member]

True RMS

I don't think the numbers are that far off as long as some of the tests

where at 16v and none of them reflect the final multiple of .707

for true RMS power.

 

[DUMPED 10+ year member]

I got bored watching after about half way through.

can someone clarify.. was the end impedance .22ohm then?

 

[AudioXtremes 10+ year member]

I got tired of arguing the champ of spl.

 

[Cabin_Pressure 10+ year member]

I don't think the numbers are that far off as long as some of the testswhere at 16v and none of them reflect the final multiple of .707

for true RMS power.

I asked the OP for a DC amp draw amount, so i could do some crude Ohms Law number crunching. But he said the Clamp he had only measured AC? Oh well.

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

Meh...

nG

 

[sanman 10+ year member]

ok what does OP stand for

Nick at incriminator, and carlton both told me that were getting damm near 8600 out of the 40.1's. Scottie and them ran theres at .7, amd i ran mine at .33

correct .707 is the way most determine rms out of peak hold results.

on the cactus it started out at .22 with a rise to .63 thts ohms

Audio Extremes hmmm you say USUCI, but can you even be competitive in that org?

I have had many say usaci isnt competitve, and its a thrid rate org, and this or that org is so much better with better builders, but when they come over and try they arent as skilled as they thought they were lol.