Bigpimpin91's 1988 Bronco II

[Louisiana_CRX 5,000+ posts]

Did you know you lost your license plate off your rear bumper //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif

Did the bass knock it off?

 

[Bigpimpin91 10+ year member]

Did the bass knock it off?

Did you know you lost your license plate off your rear bumper //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif

lol let me know get all your friends 5$ for unlimited time hahaha

Hey Path , we need to some more metering lol .. Jeep should be done hopefully soon

haha ipipe

Nice to see all of these posts staying on topic.

 

[Bigpimpin91 10+ year member]

Also,

We didn't have at 64hz test tone on hand to get a maximum score.

 

[path2spl 10+ year member]

64hz?! better change that box around i did a 139.7 with 600 watts and a tc sounds lms 4000 at 31hz

 

[craigzter 10+ year member]

all i can say is, are you fawking retarded?

my farts hit higher deeebeeeez than that man....

 

[Bigpimpin91 10+ year member]

64hz?! better change that box around i did a 139.7 with 600 watts and a tc sounds lms 4000 at 31hz

TC Sounds Far Greater than Mach 5.

 

[Bigpimpin91 10+ year member]

all i can say is, are you fawking retarded?


my farts hit higher deeebeeeez than that man....

I appreciate the comment.

 

[Bigpimpin91 10+ year member]

Did the bass knock it off?

No, that was the night I just bought it and brought it home.

 

[80INCHES 5,000+ posts]

Classic

80

 

[JBLCAMRY 10+ year member]

my brother put up a ~144db, with a single mj18. with 100 more watts. @ 44hz IIRC

something is not right with that setup. it should be much louder.

 

[Mitch86 5,000+ posts]

someone over on SSA was doing 146.xx with two MJ18s sealed... You need more power obviously, but I would still think it would be louder. Nice setup anyway. Mach 5 is good stuff. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[craigzter 10+ year member]

I appreciate the comment.

sorry..i was just being a smartass...but why do you have that sub inverted?

other than that..it isnt bad...i kinda like it

 

[Bigpimpin91 10+ year member]

Classic
80

Thanks 80.

my brother put up a ~144db, with a single mj18. with 100 more watts. @ 44hz IIRC
something is not right with that setup. it should be much louder.

BII's are not number vehicles.

Thin roofs, fiberglass hatches.

Jacob from sundown will tell you that.

One of the 18" Prototypes on a SAZ-3000D Only did a 143.

sorry..i was just being a smartass...but why do you have that sub inverted?


other than that..it isnt bad...i kinda like it

Clearance.

Mouth was not deep enough to fit the sub.

It was an attempt at a tapered T-Line.

It hit 50+hz like a dream but any lower and it ****** balls.

 

[Bigpimpin91 10+ year member]

someone over on SSA was doing 146.xx with two MJ18s sealed... You need more power obviously, but I would still think it would be louder. Nice setup anyway. Mach 5 is good stuff. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

Two Fusion 2000's on the way.

Hopefully 1400 Strapped at 4Ω.

New build in the works also.

Hopefully 145+ This time.

 

[Bigpimpin91 10+ year member]

Ordered these Friday, hopefully shipped today.

I'm going to wall it over Christmas break.

I was going to 4th Order it but a BR will have a higher and flatter output.

I want to tune it to 33hz like the box I have now, but I hear from several sources to tune higher, to 35-40hz.

I love the low, lows, The C&S Version of Put On in this Vid low.

Low notes are 27 and 20hz.

What should I go with?