ATTN: Audioholic

[denim 5,000+ posts]

maybe if you mods would stop censoring things it wouldn't have

What have I censored? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[jockhater2 10+ year member]

What have I censored? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

audioholic

that guy with the cat for an avatar

whitedragon

pro-rabbit

 

[whitedragon551 5,000+ posts]

maybe if you mods would stop censoring things it wouldn't have

Who censored anything?

 

[jockhater2 10+ year member]

Who censored anything?

tappin_azz thread

and apparently the word ninja for some reason is forbidden?

 

[quackhead 10+ year member]

[quote name='R34P3R']@quackhead

You have been spouting religious non-sense for 6 pages and you didn't even think to tag me?
I guess I will just have to force my man meat upon you so we will be able to "isolate" you from society with the other "super sinners". :up2somet:[/QUOTE]
**** you too, ******.

edited: Fuck you too, Biatch




lol

 

[whitedragon551 5,000+ posts]

tappin_azz threadand apparently the word ninja for some reason is forbidden?

It is forbidden because racist remarks were banned. After they were banned people started using Ninja as an alternative to the other N word. Since they ruined it for everyone anyone who says Ninja is now considered to be using a racist term. A handful of people ruined it for everyone.

 

[denim 5,000+ posts]

I was kind of joking because I have been working so much, the other moderators are beating me to most of the thunderdome moderation anyway.

 

[jockhater2 10+ year member]

It is forbidden because racist remarks were banned. After they were banned people started using Ninja as an alternative to the other N word. Since they ruined it for everyone anyone who says Ninja is now considered to be using a racist term. A handful of people ruined it for everyone.

well thats ***

its not like my life revolves around a forum anyways.

 

[quackhead 10+ year member]

You are free to do what you want. Your trolling trying to get a reaction and take this too far. Your actions are going to result in more rules where nobody here can discuss religion, beliefs or what ever they want without fear of getting in trouble. What I wont condone is you pressing the envelope to make a point and forcing more rules on the community. This entire conversation came about due to the recent racism threads. 

---------- Post added at 03:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:03 PM ----------

 

If people keep pressing the envelope that will be the end result.

My trolling? I have spoke straight up about what is going on....without the use of derogatory remarks to others in the Thunderdome where we are to come and discuss off topic issues. Roth proclaimed the desire to not bear children and I thanked them for that on numerous occasions. You have accused me of stating excuses, trolling, threatened to ban me, etc... For what? Responding to omegabunny's question as to why homosexuals are hated in Society? Was that really an obvious troll? If so, why was Omegabunny not banned at once? In the OP, Audioholic was called out as being a "******"....yet there was no threat to ban.

You feel homosexuality is acceptable, I do not. All I asked you for was the same thing you asked...what are the benefits to supporting that behavior? Is Homosexuality a voluntary action or an uncontrollable mental disorder?

If you think I have been trolling, you are wayy off the mark. And Yes... I called you a boy...you act like that, you get treated like that. Step up and be a man and accept the fact that not everyone shares your beliefs and quit threatening to ban someone who does not.

 

[quackhead 10+ year member]

The argument that being a homosexual doesn't fit in society is not valid. Our society is so flawed its not even funny. Its socially acceptable for priest to **** little boys, for the Pope to try to cover it up and the fact that there wasn't a mass riot and religious fallouf following, proves its socially acceptable. It's socially acceptable for 1% of the world to to exploit the rest and enjoy society 24/7 while other people work their lives away to sustain it. It is socially acceptable to have facilities were they had to install ******* nets to stop the slaves from killing themselves so we can have an iPhone.
And procreation is a good thing? We are procreating at a rate that we can't sustain. If every one turned into a knob gobbler for the next 50 years "society" would be better just on the front that there would be a couple billion less of us.

Thank you. This is why I stated there are many US citizens ready to clean house around this bitch....get some **** straightened back out. The argument for being gay to keep the population in check is not sufficient and is not a very smart one. The problem we are having begins with education at the middle school level and should be addressed from there through out the rest of school. Abstinence and AIDS/HIV awareness is very lacking in educational system. It is not population growth that is unsustainable so much as living standards...we are too spoiled to oil.

 

[OmegaBunny 10+ year member]

Quackhead where did you go to school, what level have you completed, and what was your major?

 

[quackhead 10+ year member]

Quackhead where did you go to school, what level have you completed, and what was your major?

you trolling again?..lol. the School of hard knocks, jack of all and master of none....why? Where does educational background fit into the conversation?

 

[OmegaBunny 10+ year member]

Well you are neither gay nor apparently have a degree in psychology yet you feel that homosexuality is either a) a choice or b) a mental illness despite having the education nor the "experience" to back up either claim. The DSM has not classified homosexuality as a mental disorder since the 1970's yet you feel that you have the credentials to claim that it is. I would love to see your own personal studies that definitively proves that it is a mental disorder and therefore should be classified in the DSM-V that will be released in 2013. Also, please link us to any of the peer-reviewed studies showing that you are in in fact correct in your findings and that the American Psychiatric Association is wrong.

Having family and close friends that are gay, I can tell you that it is neither a choice nor a mental disorder. Having watched close family members since birth or a very young age I can tell you that they were "different" (for a lack of a better word) when they were younger, before they had any attraction to either sex. If you choose not to like homosexuals and continue to feel that it is wrong, fine, that is your choice but know that times are changing and I and so many straight people liek me will be there to fight for equality every step of the way.

While I do not agree with the use of fag, Faggot, ***, queer, etc I will not do anything to censor it on this forum until it is a rule. Hell I use thise words on a regular basis though I really need to break the habit in my personal life.

 

[quackhead 10+ year member]

Well you are neither gay nor apparently have a degree in psychology yet you feel that homosexuality is either a) a choice or b) a mental illness despite having the education nor the "experience" to back up either claim. The DSM has not classified homosexuality as a mental disorder since the 1970's yet you feel that you have the credentials to claim that it is. I would love to see your own personal studies that definitively proves that it is a mental disorder and therefore should be classified in the DSM-V that will be released in 2013. Also, please link us to any of the peer-reviewed studies showing that you are in in fact correct in your findings and that the American Psychiatric Association is wrong.

When the decline of morals in modern civilization began.

Having family and close friends that are gay, I can tell you that it is neither a choice nor a mental disorder. Having watched close family members since birth or a very young age I can tell you that they were "different" (for a lack of a better word) when they were younger, before they had any attraction to either sex. If you choose not to like homosexuals and continue to feel that it is wrong, fine, that is your choice but know that times are changing and I and so many straight people liek me will be there to fight for equality every step of the way.

refer to my opening statement

While I do not agree with the use of fag, Faggot, ***, queer, etc I will not do anything to censor it on this forum until it is a rule. Hell I use thise words on a regular basis though I really need to break the habit in my personal life.

I very rarely use that language, as homosexuality is not a joke.

 

[OmegaBunny 10+ year member]

So you are saying that the decline of modern society began the moment that homosexuality was no longer considered a mental illness? I hope to god you are trolling because that is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard. The same thing can be said about slaves being freed, blacks being given civil rights, different races being able to marry, etc.

By different I meant not fitting what is considered the social norm for sexes. Both gay males in my family preferred to hang out with the women instead of watching football, they preferred to shop instead of playing football, had "dolls" instead of action figures etc but beyond that they were/are bright, intelligent, thoughtful, caring, funny, loving etc. If that is considered the downfall of modern day society then so be it. I'm out of this conversation, keep it clean!

Peace!