Whether you agree with Bush's decisions in Iraq or not, you cannot call what he, and the United States, are doing there terrorism.
First of all there's the opinion his (and our) actions are illegal, there is no justice system our president, or us as citizens, officially oblidge by that has decided any of this is illegal.
Second, to use that definition in its broadest sense as you are doing, any leader of a nation that uses force on foreign soil could/would be labeled a terrorist. G.W Bush would, Bush Sr, Bill Clinton, Vladimir Putin, Tony Blair, etc. There is no political organization we are threatening with our actions in Iraq, unless you want to include Al Q'aeda. Then yes, Bush is the leader of the terrorists against Al Q'eada. Satisfied? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
I really dont understand the attempts (on boths sides) to demonize the other side's candidate. I think its a big factor on the extreme polarization our country seems to be moving towards politically.