Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Announcement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 589780" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>Whether you agree with Bush's decisions in Iraq or not, you cannot call what he, and the United States, are doing there terrorism.</p><p></p><p>First of all there's the opinion his (and our) actions are illegal, there is no justice system our president, or us as citizens, officially oblidge by that has decided any of this is illegal.</p><p></p><p>Second, to use that definition in its broadest sense as you are doing, any leader of a nation that uses force on foreign soil could/would be labeled a terrorist. G.W Bush would, Bush Sr, Bill Clinton, Vladimir Putin, Tony Blair, etc. There is no political organization we are threatening with our actions in Iraq, unless you want to include Al Q'aeda. Then yes, Bush is the leader of the terrorists against Al Q'eada. Satisfied? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif</p><p></p><p>I really dont understand the attempts (on boths sides) to demonize the other side's candidate. I think its a big factor on the extreme polarization our country seems to be moving towards politically.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 589780, member: 549629"] Whether you agree with Bush's decisions in Iraq or not, you cannot call what he, and the United States, are doing there terrorism. First of all there's the opinion his (and our) actions are illegal, there is no justice system our president, or us as citizens, officially oblidge by that has decided any of this is illegal. Second, to use that definition in its broadest sense as you are doing, any leader of a nation that uses force on foreign soil could/would be labeled a terrorist. G.W Bush would, Bush Sr, Bill Clinton, Vladimir Putin, Tony Blair, etc. There is no political organization we are threatening with our actions in Iraq, unless you want to include Al Q'aeda. Then yes, Bush is the leader of the terrorists against Al Q'eada. Satisfied? [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif[/IMG] I really dont understand the attempts (on boths sides) to demonize the other side's candidate. I think its a big factor on the extreme polarization our country seems to be moving towards politically. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Announcement
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list