This really seems to be a question of beauty over substance. The alpine is gorgeous, simple to use, but lacks a lot of bells and whistles. The clarion on the other hand gives you so much control over your audio, and how you want it to hear it’s almost confusing. It’s easy on the eyes, not as much as the alpine, and the screen isn’t even in the same league. I have been to tweeter to check on the alpine, it’s nice, but I have no idea how it sounds. They had it hooked up to a bunch of different amps. I am not going to be running a separate amp, I am going to be running the speakers of the HU, and I would like to know how it sounds. My friend has the Clarion, and it sounds great. All I ever owned is clarion HU's, and they have never disappointed be, but I am big ipod user, and love the fact the alpine was co-designed with apple, and is as easy to use as an ipod. I really don’t want to regret my decision, so I wanted to ask some enthusiasts what they thought of the 2 units, and that’s where you come in. I am also looking at getting 2 Pairs of Polk Audio db6500 to go with the HU. I used to only get CerwinVega speakers because of the warmth they would output, but it’s hard to find a place that sells them anymore.
