Abu Musab al-Zarqawi dead...

[phildapimp89 10+ year member]

Just by reading this, I can tell that Berg is a complete tard

"Under Saddam Hussein, about 30,000 deaths a year. Under George Bush, about 60,000 deaths a year. I don't get it. Why is it better to have George Bush the king of Iraq rather than Saddam Hussein?"

You cannot compare the two... Compare our population to Iraqs...

295,734,134

to

26,074,906

Thats like an 11:1 ratio lol... That means 340,251 people would have to be killed under George Bush to be even equal with the amount of deaths per year.

His statement is pretty vague too. So I may have mixed it up.

 

[project f-150 10+ year member]

Just by reading this, I can tell that Berg is a complete tard"Under Saddam Hussein, about 30,000 deaths a year. Under George Bush, about 60,000 deaths a year. I don't get it. Why is it better to have George Bush the king of Iraq rather than Saddam Hussein?"

You cannot compare the two... Compare our population to Iraqs...

he is talking about in iraq.... not here vs. iraq

 

[siliconinja 10+ year member]

what does it matter the population? a death is a death, and bush is a ****ing tard

 

[project f-150 10+ year member]

I agree about bush... but lets not turn this thread into a discussion bout bush!!!

 

[siliconinja 10+ year member]

true dat

 

[Brock 5,000+ posts]

berg's dad is a smart person

 

[phildapimp89 10+ year member]

*Edit* nvm

 

[eisenhower 10+ year member]

berg's dad is a smart person

your a funny guy.

He, like cindy sheehan and the 9/11 widows, are complete tools for the left wing, they push their silly ideologies by using family member's deaths. Its disgusting and disgraceful.

"I think the news of the loss of any human being is a tragedy. I think al-Zarqawi's death is a double tragedy," he said. "His death will incite a new wave of revenge. George Bush and al-Zarqawi are two men who believe in revenge."

Thats what Michael Berg says about zarqawi, the man who personally beheaded his son. what a brainwashed douchebag.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/6/8/102821.shtml?s=lh

Perhaps mr.berg forgot about the thousands murdered by saddam with chemical gases: http://www.usaid.gov/iraq/legacyofterror.html

 

[iceteebone 5,000+ posts]

He's actually hiding in a cave trying to sustain life with kidney problems. Why waste time on him when there are active leaders who are real threats? This death is significant, but Im positive he's already been replaced.

hmmm the guy who supposedly mastermind one of the greatest mass murders on our soil and we'll just forget about bringing him to justice cause he will die anyways. just gonna let him off the hook with no punishment.

 

[eisenhower 10+ year member]

hmmm the guy who supposedly mastermind one of the greatest mass murders on our soil and we'll just forget about bringing him to justice cause he will die anyways. just gonna let him off the hook with no punishment.

So blowing the **** out of him and al qaeda and putting him in constant hiding isnt justice enough, you think we should sacrifice many more men and time to find him?

Im glad your not running this country

 

[Phrozt 10+ year member]

your a funny guy.
He, like cindy sheehan and the 9/11 widows, are complete tools for the left wing, they push their silly ideologies by using family member's deaths. Its disgusting and disgraceful.

"I think the news of the loss of any human being is a tragedy. I think al-Zarqawi's death is a double tragedy," he said. "His death will incite a new wave of revenge. George Bush and al-Zarqawi are two men who believe in revenge."

Thats what Michael Berg says about zarqawi, the man who personally beheaded his son. what a brainwashed douchebag.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/6/8/102821.shtml?s=lh

Perhaps mr.berg forgot about the thousands murdered by saddam with chemical gases: http://www.usaid.gov/iraq/legacyofterror.html

No.. his figures were still right... Here's a quote from CNN though, instead of the intrest group source that you posted

Human rights groups believe about 300,000 people were killed during Saddam's 24-year rule, which ended when U.S.-led forces toppled his regime in 2003.

(http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/13/iraq.graves/)

300,000/24 years = 12,500.. so there's still 17,500 deaths a year that Saddam could still be responsible for, which easily fits into Berg's claim

 

[iceteebone 5,000+ posts]

So blowing the **** out of him and al qaeda and putting him in constant hiding isnt justice enough, you think we should sacrifice many more men and time to find him? Im glad your not running this country

no it's a better idea to go over to iraq and have our men killed there to get someone who wasn't involved in tha attacks

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

what did i just say about newbs ruining the forums?

anyway, my worlds still spinning. all i want is peace in the middle east and a blow job

 

[AcidicDreams 10+ year member]

wow.. did anyone read berg's response on this???
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/06/08/berg.interview/index.html

stupid hippie... Vengence FTW, Hippie Passivness FTL

 

[AcidicDreams 10+ year member]

Hurray! He's dead

BTW: Zarqawi has been nothing more than a street thug his whole life. He was thrown in jail when he was 12 for ****** assault...

I heard it on NPR... some lady did a profile on him and it went into print today called "The Short violent life of Zarqawi", it was just a coincidence it ran today..