Abortion

[andrew2944r 10+ year member]

so a ***** victim should not have a choice? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

Thats my only catch is the above comment, but other than that Pro-Life

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

so a ***** victim should not have a choice? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

no many think it shouldn't be a choice in that situation. problem is, that the people who campaign for pro-choice, take it much farther than that.

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

Thats my only catch is the above comment, but other than that Pro-Life

****** as well. life threatening child birth to the mom is another. there are a few more than just that.

 

[Mike465 10+ year member]

I'm all for scrambling it's brains and then quefing it out.

 

[01 S 10 10+ year member]

Pro choice ONLY for **** victims and life threatening births.

IF you do not want the baby, im sure there are plenty of couples that do not have the ability to have kids that are ready and willing to adopt a child. Abortion = easy way out

 

[newusername 10+ year member]

It should only be legal if it's the result of **** or will put the mother's life in danger. There is no such thing as "choosing" to kill a human being, and a child is no different. If you wish to argue when a ***** becomes a human being, then that is a great matter to analyze scientifically, but there's no room for choice.

I'm also for *** education.

 

[bunkerking09 10+ year member]

Pro choice ONLY for **** victims and life threatening births.
IF you do not want the baby, im sure there are plenty of couples that do not have the ability to have kids that are ready and willing to adopt a child. Abortion = easy way out

qft

 

[oldschool4me 10+ year member]

****** as well. life threatening child birth to the mom is another. there are a few more than just that.

that also, abnormalities to the baby also. mother has aids etc.

 

[97gp 5,000+ posts]

Pro choice ONLY for **** victims and life threatening births.
IF you do not want the baby, im sure there are plenty of couples that do not have the ability to have kids that are ready and willing to adopt a child. Abortion = easy way out

It should only be legal if it's the result of **** or will put the mother's life in danger. There is no such thing as "choosing" to kill a human being, and a child is no different. If you wish to argue when a ***** becomes a human being, then that is a great matter to analyze scientifically, but there's no room for choice.
I'm also for *** education.

I dont see how you guys could have exceptions to "baby murdering"?

 

[undeadxsunshine 10+ year member]

Yeah I see ****, ******, and danger to mother as something different. But I would hope a **** victim would still have the heart to carry out the pregnancy and spare the baby's life.

What's scary is this Freedom of Choice Act that's trying to be passed. If I'm not mistaken it will allow minors to get abortions without consent of their parents. Something just doesn't seem right about that to me.

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

So, we're not dingos but we are no better than hyenas. Interesting.

pretend that it's someone talking when you read. it'll be easier to understand it

 

[oldschool4me 10+ year member]

should have to be done early in pregnancy is the main thing.

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

I dont see how you guys could have exceptions to "baby murdering"?

becuase we've been given the freedom of choice. by our country. and apparently god even gives choice (i'm atheist, so it's moot to me). i also have the right to think they're pieces of shit for doing it.

 

[newusername 10+ year member]

I dont see how you guys could have exceptions to "baby murdering"?

In the case of ****, the pregnancy is a result of an unwilling act by the mother; she should not have to bear the weight of the child, nor should the system. Pregnancy testing is often required or recommended when someone is *****, so these circumstances are ideally caught early.

In the case of harm to the mother, it is again a circumstance beyond the mother's control, and if the child poses a significant risk to her immediate health, then the mother has the right to protect herself.

 

[01 S 10 10+ year member]

I dont see how you guys could have exceptions to "baby murdering"?

so if your g/f or wife was pregnant and the doctors knew she couldnt survive the birth, what would you do? have the baby? or adopt a child?