Current events discussion

[RobGMN Premium Member]

That was 3-4 years ago. Now the POTUS controls gas prices.

So when TRUMP inks a deal to directly increase oil prices for a specific time period, and prices increase for that exact time period, how is it that TRUMP is not responsible for oil price increases?

Please explain in non-KoolAid logic.

But in KoolAid logic, I guess we could say that Biden inked a deal to sell oil form the SPR, but Biden is not responsible for oil being sold from the SPR.

So which is it: People are responsible for things that happen directly as a result of their actions, or not?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So when TRUMP inks a deal to directly increase oil prices for a specific time period, and prices increase for that exact time period, how is it that TRUMP is not responsible for oil price increases?

Please explain in non-KoolAid logic.

But in KoolAid logic, I guess we could say that Biden inked a deal to sell oil form the SPR, but Biden is not responsible for oil being sold from the SPR.

So which is it: People are responsible for things that happen directly as a result of their actions, or not?

Why would he "ink" a deal to make oil cost more? He is a business man. He would want to buy for less. You are not making sense.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Trump -
I want to buy your oil, such beautiful oil... not as nice as our oil but still... like nothing anyone has seen. I know you want to sell it to me for $50 a barrel but I am a business man, the best business man you have ever seen, no one like me. Let me buy it from you for $120 a barrel!!

Oil People -

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

 

[Old_Slapper]

You would. Traitor.

I am for the people, not the government. The same thing the government should be saying. I would I care more about a government building than buildings owned by the hardworking people. But's I wouldn't expect you to admit that. You're too busy pushing your agenda.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I am for the people, not the government. The same thing the government should be saying. I would I care more about a government building than buildings owned by the hardworking people. But's I wouldn't expect you to admit that. You're too busy pushing your agenda.

Only the first sentence makes any sense here.
Try again?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I am for the people, not the government. The same thing the government should be saying. I would I care more about a government building than buildings owned by the hardworking people. But's I wouldn't expect you to admit that. You're too busy pushing your agenda.

I see Cali is on fire again. Good thing Newsom didn't refill those reservoirs.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I see Cali is on fire again. Good think Newsom didn't refill those reservoirs.

The city-controlled reservoirs that are filled by rain and snowpack runoff?

Newsom is Mother Nature, now?

 

[deez283 10+ year member]

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Let's be honest, Ellison and Walz are not guilty of any wrongdoings or negligence. This fraud was so well hidden that it's a miracle it got uncovered at all. These were very sophisticated schemes that escaped even our own intrepid fraud investigator Always Right Rob. That's astonishing when you take in consideration Rob has (self confessed) never been wrong.