Current events discussion

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Locally it seems the "War with Iran" has only made the price of reg. gas go from $2.79ish to $2.99. I am not sure how I will feed the kids or make it to work... I don't even know if I can afford beef!!

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

It's interesting

Locally it seems the "War with Iran" has only made the price of reg. gas go from $2.79ish to $2.99. I am not sure how I will feed the kids or make it to work... I don't even know if I can afford beef!!

I'm only paying around $3/gal too. Ultimately, this is something that had to happen and the die was cast a long time ago.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I wanted to take a minute for all the die hard liberals, mainly RobGMN, to take a moment to understand that the constitution is for WE THE PEOPLE. We the people being United States Citizens. With that said... Rob, read this right here, carefully.

“unlawful aliens are not part of ‘the people’...” United States v. Sitladeen, 64 F.4th 978, 987 (8th Cir. 2023).

Yes there is more but this is the relevant part. Illegal aliens and those who enter the country, this country, are not Americans and are not part of "We the People". This is our constitution, not theirs.

 

[administrator]

Does anyone still own the rights to the Car Audio mag name layout? I wonder how many of us old-timers would buy a shirt with that on it...

Interesting tidbit. Car Audio Mag tried to steal CarAudio.com. I think it was 06-07, I received a letter that they owned a trademark/copyright for “car audio” and needed to transfer the domain to them no questions asked. I hired an attorney and they took care of it quickly, as car audio is a generic term. They met their demise not that long after. Guess who now owns www.caraudiomagazine.com

As far as a T-shirt I don’t think they would mind in the slightest who printed one with the logo these days.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Interesting tidbit. Car Audio Mag tried to steal CarAudio.com. I think it was 06-07, I received a letter that they owned a trademark/copyright for “car audio” and needed to transfer the domain to them no questions asked. I hired an attorney and they took care of it quickly, as car audio is a generic term. They met their demise not that long after. Guess who now owns www.caraudiomagazine.com

As far as a T-shirt I don’t think they would mind in the slightest who printed one with the logo these days.

Sounds like a little income generator for the site if enough of us old-timers get one.
Something is better than nothing.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I wanted to take a minute for all the die hard liberals, mainly RobGMN, to take a moment to understand that the constitution is for WE THE PEOPLE. We the people being United States Citizens. With that said... Rob, read this right here, carefully.

“unlawful aliens are not part of ‘the people’...” United States v. Sitladeen, 64 F.4th 978, 987 (8th Cir. 2023).

Yes there is more but this is the relevant part. Illegal aliens and those who enter the country, this country, are not Americans and are not part of "We the People". This is our constitution, not theirs.

Rules for thee and not for me.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

LOL at people who think they've found a "gotcha", only for it to not be the win they anticipated.
Funny stuff.

 

[deez283 10+ year member]

LOL at people who think the COTUS was written for a Terrorist that illegally entered our country.
Funny stuff.

 

[deez283 10+ year member]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

LOL at people who think the COTUS was written for a Terrorist that illegally entered our country.
Funny stuff.

You should probably read it, and the SCOTUS clarifications, sometime.
It would help you seem less ill-informed about how it works.

Maybe start your journey with Reno v. Flores, and Matthews v. Diaz, and dig from there.
Ignore the right-wing desire to be undereducated. Expand your horizons.

And if you dislike the COTUS, maybe work toward getting it changed.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You should probably read it, and the SCOTUS clarifications, sometime.
It would help you seem less ill-informed about how it works.

Maybe start your journey with Reno v. Flores, and Matthews v. Diaz, and dig from there.
Ignore the right-wing desire to be undereducated. Expand your horizons.

And if you dislike the COTUS, maybe work toward getting it changed.

LOL at the person who argues against everyone and then when presented with facts that prove him wrong he argues against the facts. I guess the facts were out to get him and make him look bad... could have been Trumps fault.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You should probably read it, and the SCOTUS clarifications, sometime.
It would help you seem less ill-informed about how it works.

Maybe start your journey with Reno v. Flores, and Matthews v. Diaz, and dig from there.
Ignore the right-wing desire to be undereducated. Expand your horizons.

And if you dislike the COTUS, maybe work toward getting it changed.

STFU.

Mathews v. Diaz​

426 U.S. 67 (1976)

The Supreme Court held that a provision of the Social Security Act denying eligibility for Medicare part B unless the applicant has been in the United States for a minimum of five years and has been admitted for permanent residency does not deny the applicant of liberty or property without due process of law. (Read the opinion here.)


Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993), was a Supreme Court of the United States case that addressed the detention and release of unaccompanied minors.

Not rulings making illegals American Citizens.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Diaz and Clara contend that the requirement of lawful admission for permanent residence should be construed so that it is satisfied by aliens, such as they, who have been paroled into the United States at the discretion of the Attorney General. However, such aliens remain in the United States at the discretion of the Attorney General, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(5), and hence cannot have been "lawfully admitted for permanent residence," as § 1395o (2)(B) requires.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

It's hilarious watching the talking heads out there claim we're getting crushed in Iran. We'll be surrendering any day now.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

STFU.

Mathews v. Diaz​

426 U.S. 67 (1976)

The Supreme Court held that a provision of the Social Security Act denying eligibility for Medicare part B unless the applicant has been in the United States for a minimum of five years and has been admitted for permanent residency does not deny the applicant of liberty or property without due process of law. (Read the opinion here.)


Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993), was a Supreme Court of the United States case that addressed the detention and release of unaccompanied minors.

Not rulings making illegals American Citizens.

I don't care what the SCOTUS said. What did Rob say? That's what matters.