deez283
10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Huh Seems democrats support it to the max..
Last edited:
Huh Seems democrats support it to the max..
Says the guy defending a rap*st, racist, 34x convicted felon, self-professed s*xual predator, tax cheat, pathological liar.
Gonna need you to stfu.There's a difference between using an AI result that is wrong, versus one that is verifiable with other sources.
Or are you willing to support the AI result someone got and repeated, that optical cable is restricted to 96kHz?
There is a difference... One IS the cable the other is the abbreviated name brand of cable. (That being Toshiba Link)Maybe you agree that there is a difference between Toslink and optical cables?
Beating heart after 22 days. Brain activity after 6 weeks. Embryo is HUMAN.How about that pro-abortionists agree an embryo is a living human?
Hmmm, it appears sound can move slower than "the speed of sound".Would you agree that sound can move at less than the speed of sound?
We said outputs Rob... you said channels.Perhaps that a mono amplifier can have multiple channels?
Perhaps you should learn to keep your mouth closed.These are all false AI results that have been shared by others here as truths. Any attmept at verifying them shows they are false. If I post an AI result, it can be VERIFIED through other sources as factually correct.
Do you see the difference, or was that too confusing for you?
Huh Seems democrats support it to the max..
Sorry, you lose. All verified. This was your logic... that they can be verified. Poor fella.LOL at all morons who use an AI result as proof that an AI result is correct.
Bandwagon Appeal, Appeal to Authority, Circular Reasoning, and Begging the Question.
The uneducated are easily fooled by such fallacies.
Nope because those results are verified by MULTIPLE SOURCES. Loser."AI is correct because AI said AI is correct".
Believed by morons worldwide.