Current events discussion

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The usual suspects.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

They were just lighting fireworks - Rachel Maddow said so.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"Anything but refer to these people as what they are".
But how dare you refer to Trump as a r@pist, felon, se*ual predator, tax cheat, pathological liar, r@cist.

THAT kind of accuracy in a discussion is just MEAN, because it's all "fake news". Dear Leader Trump is the savior of our country and everything has been made GREAT again.

You really are clown like no other RobGMN.

If he was a r@pist he would have been convicted as such and sent to prison. So you are speaking your opinion.

A felon with no victims.

Se*ual predator? You better include yourself if you have EVER spoken sexually about a woman or what you would or have done to one.

Tax Cheat? Smart business man who uses the same tax breaks democrats use. So are they all cheats too?

Pathological liar? Why, because you say so or were told to believe it? He has never spoken to you about anything.

Racist? Should be easy to prove instead of just accusing. Prove him a r@cist. While you are at it liar, prove you are not a r@cist.

 

[deez283 10+ year member]

Always yelling Trump is a racist..

 

[deez283 10+ year member]

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

You really are clown like no other RobGMN.

If he was a r@pist he would have been convicted as such and sent to prison. So you are speaking your opinion.

A felon with no victims.

Se*ual predator? You better include yourself if you have EVER spoken sexually about a woman or what you would or have done to one.

Tax Cheat? Smart business man who uses the same tax breaks democrats use. So are they all cheats too?

Pathological liar? Why, because you say so or were told to believe it? He has never spoken to you about anything.

Racist? Should be easy to prove instead of just accusing. Prove him a r@cist. While you are at it liar, prove you are not a r@cist.

It is odd that Team Left considers him a raisinist despite never being found guilty of or liable for the aforementioned crime.

I still find it baffling that he was convicted of "felon falsifying of business records" without a victim of said crime. A truly victimless crime somehow inflated into 34 felony counts??? And they wonder why so many people are quick to dismiss this "crime"?

Tax Cheat is an interesting label. If you're following the rules (no matter how fawked the rules are), then you're literally not cheating.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Always yelling Trump is a racist..

Rules for thee and not for me.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

It is odd that Team Left considers him a raisinist despite never being found guilty of or liable for the aforementioned crime.

So if a guy jams his fingers in your wife or daughter without consent, you'd consider him a good candidate for POTUS.
Got it.

I still find it baffling that he was convicted of "felon falsifying of business records" without a victim of said crime. A truly victimless crime somehow inflated into 34 felony counts??? And they wonder why so many people are quick to dismiss this "crime"?

You think there has to be a victim for a crime to be committed?
Reckless driving can result in a felony conviction. name the victim for me.
Carrying a pistol without a license can be a felony. Name the victim.
Mortgae fraud can be a felony, even if the mortgage is not defaulted on. Name the victim.
Possession with intent to distribute can be a felony, even if no distribution occurs. Name the victim.
Consporacy to commit murder can be a felony, even if no murder occurs. Name the victim.

Your attempt to absolve Trump of committing a "victimless" crime is childish thinking, at best.

Tax Cheat is an interesting label. If you're following the rules (no matter how fawked the rules are), then you're literally not cheating.

Therein lies the problem. NOT FOLLOWING THE RULES.
The rules wre not followed, hence TAX CHEAT.

It's really weird how people think that becasue they dislike or disagree with a law, then the law must not carry any weight or be valid.
Why is that?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

@Eggs

Here's the latest news on the apartments that were taken over TDA in Aurora. Funny how this paper says there is no evidence that the apartments were taken over by TDA; Aurora Sentinel used to be less biased. I guess we're supposed to ignore what we saw with our 2 eyes; those guys banging on doors with guns in hand were actually the property management company. They just have a zero tolerance policy on late payments. The property managers were also probably responsible for stealing and stripping cars in the streets in the area.

Anyway, the city condemned and seized the apartments and now they've sued/settled with the owners for I'd guess $500k. So the owners not only lost the property without compensation, but have to pay the city for taking the property, because the property got taken over by gangs because Denver is a Sanctuary City and Aurora decided not to enforce the law. So who the fudgsicles is going to invest in apartments in these rougher neighborhoods? Who would even invest in a marginal neighborhood; 10-20 years later, the neighborhood goes south and the city uses it as an excuse to grab your property - F that. My guess is they want to go "Mamdani" and the city(s) will just keep condemning and seizing property because gov't housing is awesome sauce.

Aurora settles lawsuit with shuttered 'Edge at Lowry' apartment owners for $300K - Sentinel Colorado

“The agreement requires professional security at the closed apartment complex until it is sold or rehabbed.”

sentinelcolorado.com

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

They need to do away with Congressional districts/gerrymandering. And to top it off, potentially the only non-dem Colorado would send would be Lauren Boebert. Colorado has 8 districts, we should just send 5 dems and 3 reds to the House.

Proposed Colorado congressional map could give Democrats 7-1 majority - Sentinel Colorado

"Ideals cannot stand alone when a political faction is openly capitalizing on the inability of their opponents to fight fire with fire." - Curtis Hubbard

sentinelcolorado.com

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So if a guy jams his fingers in your wife or daughter without consent, you'd consider him a good candidate for POTUS.
Got it.

You think there has to be a victim for a crime to be committed?
Reckless driving can result in a felony conviction. name the victim for me.
Carrying a pistol without a license can be a felony. Name the victim.
Mortgae fraud can be a felony, even if the mortgage is not defaulted on. Name the victim.
Possession with intent to distribute can be a felony, even if no distribution occurs. Name the victim.
Consporacy to commit murder can be a felony, even if no murder occurs. Name the victim.

Your attempt to absolve Trump of committing a "victimless" crime is childish thinking, at best.

Therein lies the problem. NOT FOLLOWING THE RULES.
The rules wre not followed, hence TAX CHEAT.

It's really weird how people think that becasue they dislike or disagree with a law, then the law must not carry any weight or be valid.
Why is that?

Your delusions grow by the passing day my friend. From your multiple spelling errors stemming from your rage to the hypotheticals you lefties cling to just so you can claim to hate Trump.

IF a guy jams his fingers in your wife or daughter...? Can you be specific or does your whole entire leftest argument stem from being as vague as possible? Chest? Shoulder? Arm? Eye? Where is this finger hypothetically going?

No victims needed for a crime? Well for the crimes YOU claim Trump was convicted of there are specific victims aren't there. None seem to have surfaced though have they? Interesting.

The point of the tax laws is that he IS following them just like your Democrat friends do. When he made that clear to Hillary you noticed she couldn't deny it. Knowing how to use the law, including loopholes does not mean a violation of the law.

Rob, get your head out of the far left liberal medias hypothetical a$$.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I'm living rent-free.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I'm living rent-free.

I wouldn't say that. I just read the crap you post and it is clear as a bell to any non-biased person just how left you are. You are ignorant and full of blind hate and have no clue why.

 

[Old_Slapper]

There is no irony in pointing out the facts, not that facts would be anything you comprehend or even believe in.

LOL....
More irony.

You didn't answer my questions.

Did the cop, who shot Michael Brown in Ferguson, really murder Michael Brown?
Did the cop, who shot Trevon Martin in Florida, really murder Trevon Martin?