Current events discussion

1770647913236.png
 
LOL Hey Rob, list 5 crimes committed by Democrats during the Biden administration.
How about running a country while suffering from dementia? And since Auto Pen Joe was clearly suffering from dementia, does that mean Harris was criminally negligent for not stepping up and taking over as POTUS since Biden was clearly incapacitated? Is opening up the borders without Congressional approval a crime - should be.
 
No WONDER Trump was able to complain about halftime. They played it on the screen at his own golf course, while he was there.
Ironic.

1770650954043.png

1770650976876.png

1770651052448.png


Too deranged to control his own venues.
Truth
Really
Upsets
Most
RePublicans
 
Last edited:
Dear Leader and The MAGATs don't like censorship of dangerous misinformation, but if critical things are said about him...

1770651966139.png

The posts will be internally archived but will no longer be on public view, the State Department confirmed to NPR. Staff members were told that anyone wanting to see older posts will have to file a Freedom of Information Act request, according to a State Department employee who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation by the Trump administration. That would differ from how the U.S. government typically handles archiving the public online footprint of previous administrations.
The move comes as the Trump administration has removed wide swaths of information from government websites that conflict with the president's views, including environmental and health data and references to women, people of color and members of the *****+ community. The government has also taken down signs at national parks mentioning slavery and references to Trump's impeachments and presidency at the National Portrait Gallery.

And the MAGATs cheer "Censorship is the best!"
 
Last edited:
Dear Leader and The MAGATs don't like censorship of dangerous misinformation, but if critical things are said about him...

View attachment 70556
The posts will be internally archived but will no longer be on public view, the State Department confirmed to NPR. Staff members were told that anyone wanting to see older posts will have to file a Freedom of Information Act request, according to a State Department employee who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation by the Trump administration. That would differ from how the U.S. government typically handles archiving the public online footprint of previous administrations.
The move comes as the Trump administration has removed wide swaths of information from government websites that conflict with the president's views, including environmental and health data and references to women, people of color and members of the *****+ community. The government has also taken down signs at national parks mentioning slavery and references to Trump's impeachments and presidency at the National Portrait Gallery.

And the MAGATs cheer "Censorship is the best!"

Proof of liberal censorship​


This week, House Democrats blocked my attempt to bring transparency to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). We deserve to know whether, and how, politicians and unelected bureaucrats are wielding political influence to shield the public from hearing conservative thought.

That’s why I introduced a Resolution of Inquiry, which was marked-up in the Energy and Commerce Committee this week. My resolution would have forced the FCC to disclose any documents that detail politically motivated censorship, whether it be de-platforming conservative channels like Fox, Newsmax, and OAN or labeling Republican’s social media accounts as “misinformation” simply because they do not align with a liberal world view.

Every single committee Democrat voted no. They are keeping information out of the hands of the American people – information we deserve to have. What do they have against transparency? What do they have to hide?

Free speech is a First Amendment right for a reason. Without it, we don’t have a democracy.

Unfortunately, the left is waging a war on our right to free speech. If Democrats won’t bring transparency to the FCC, then I’m bringing the receipts. Here are just some of the attempts they’ve made to censor speech this Congress:

  • February 22, 2021: Two House Democrats urge cable, satellite, and internet programming distributors to drop Fox, Newsmax, and OAN.

  • April 2021: Biden Administration official meets with Twitter to advocate that conservative users be shut down.

  • July 15, 2021: White House confirms that it is in “regular touch” with social media companies about monitoring content it deems as “misinformation.”

  • March 3, 2022: Biden Administration official demand that Big Tech companies hand over information about how many social media users saw COVID-19 “misinformation.”

  • April 27, 2022: Department of Homeland Security announces the creation of a “Disinformation Governance Board.”

  • August 12, 2022: White House internal communications reveal that it had a role in censoring prominent conservative reporter Alex Berenson.

The list goes on. We aren’t just theorizing that political censorship exists, we know that it does.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant, but Washington Democrats refuse to let it in.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,737
Views
450,366
Last reply date
Last reply from
Jimi77
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top