And there you go again, showing us you know nothing of what you speak.
Go ahead and look at the court paperwork I've linked to, probably a dozen times.
Read it thoroughly, then come back and explain to us that it's fake, was rescinded, or overturned on appeal.
Show me in the court records where it is stated that Trump is not a rap*st or rac*st, other than by Trump or his legal team.
Interesting. So a slaveowner grabbing one of the women and bringing her to wherever fro some shagging, then she comes back in whatever state, is not "public"? No one knew it was happening?
And where did you get this rule that a PDA means you are not racist? Did the mayor explain it to you?
You think a PICTURE proves he is not racist, but 3 days of testimony in court by a plaintiff, followed by a court decision is not enough to prove he is a rap*st?
It's funny how the standards change when you need to meet the narrative, huh?
Who ever said you have to be white to be racist? Was that one of your beliefs?
And I'm not even sure where you are going with the rest of that babbling.
Proving that you are NOT a racist is impossible, if you don't commit racist acts. Maybe in your heart of hearts you are racist. But if you never act on it, who would know?
However, when you do racist stuff, you're pretty much a racist by default.
Why would you read the court records as such, when they say the opposite? Simply to deny the reality?
That's pretty dumb. Do you regularly deny facts, and think it makes you correct?
Again, denying the reality of the court docs is just a silly thing for an adult to do.
It's like the idiots who deny that Jan 6th ever happened, yet also claim Jan 6th was a false flag perpetrated by liberals.
Huh? Who is my "savior", and when did this "savior" get verifed by the courts as a racist and rap*st?
You couldn't do that if your babysitter helped you.
FFS, I stumped you with the simplest of math problems of fire hydrant flow rates. A problem you STILL can't answer, even with help from your mayor and fire chief friends.
Clinton? The guy who hasn't been POTUS for 25 YEARS? An adulterer? OK? And?
Where's the proof of racism and r*pe? (I assume that's who you think is my "savior")
It was under appeal. You don't open a case to the public when it's under appeal.
That's like handing out your playbook BEFORE the Superbowl. Common sense.
It's the order of operations. If Trump is not beholden to the law and is under contempt charges, and also breaking the law in not releasing the files, then NO one is beholden if involved in that same case.
Why do you think it's OK for Trump to be in contempt, and to break the law in not releasing the files as mandated by law?
Do you think he is Dear leader,, not subject to the laws of our country, but everyone else SHOULD be?
Explain your double standard.
Order of operations. If PTUS is not subject to our laws, then no one should be.
How many days ago was the deadline to release ALL of the files? And they've released less than 1%.
Why do you think Trump is above the law?
"With an open mind". Where you declare a single picture as proof that the courts are wrong.
Good stuff.
I've posted links probably a dozen times, and I'll bet even in a direct response to one of you posts.
Simply denying the reality doesn't make it go away.
And telling us you can't find the info on your own, is an admittance of your limited abilities.
Was that your goal?
You believe that's how it was done, but state that's not how it was done?
I'm not the one who wrote the creation story. Humanity being boiled down an initial existence of just two people, makes ****** an absolute necessity.
D you not know how procreation works?
The big bang theory is scientifically the accepted explanation of what happened. The evidence is so strong, it's accepted as fact.
Show me all of the scientific evidence of a "god" (YOUR god, not any other religion's "god") molding the earth from clay and blowing on it to give life.
Show me the overwhelming scientific evidence of the existence of ANY god, at all.
Educate me in all the scientific backing for your religious beliefs.
But when you BELIEVE it in the face of near-irrefutable science (i.e. fact) that says otherwise, then you are admitting that you accept beliefs over facts.
How does that make any sense?
if you BELEIVED that dinosaurs never existed, in spite of looking at bones that were extracted from the ground, would that not be a dumb thing to do?
What if you BELIEVED that the area of a circle is not determined by the calculation A=π r^2? Do you think that would somehow change the facts?
When it comes to religion, why are beliefs held in such high regard over facts?
